Fertility Awareness · Methods

Ovulation method of family planning

Billings JJ

Published December 2, 1972 Lancet (London, England), 2(7788), 1193-1194
DOI 10.1016/s0140-6736(72)92610-4 PMID 4117608
Read our synopsis

RRM Academy Synopsis

Billings Ovulation Method Had 0.69% Failure Rate in Tonga Trial

This 1972 Lancet letter is by John Billings, a co-developer of the ovulation method. He answers critics of a Tongan field trial. The trial reported a combined failure rate of 0.69%, counting both method and user error. Billings said true failures are ones beyond a couple's control. He distinguished those from a couple's own choice to stop.

Key Findings

  • The combined biological and user failure rate of the ovulation method in the Tonga field trial was 0.69%.
  • Every woman in the trial who wanted to use the method was able to do so, including women with irregular cycles or who were breastfeeding.
  • Supervision was close only during the teaching phase. After that, women were seen only when they asked, sometimes months apart because visits depended on travel to the islands where they lived.
  • Billings said the method can be taught woman-to-woman. Once learned, it needs no further supervision for the rest of a woman's reproductive life.

Interpretation

This is a letter to the editor. The document presents no primary research report. Billings responds to critics of a published field trial of the method among Tongan women. The letter states the trial's failure rate. The letter omits the trial size, follow-up length, or how failures were confirmed. The original Tongan report holds those details. The comparison with the temperature method rests on an earlier study by the same authors. The earlier study's specifics are not given in this letter. The findings describe one field program and may not apply to other settings or teaching approaches.

RRM Context

The ovulation method is a fertility awareness-based method. The method is a tool for charting a woman's cycle in restorative reproductive medicine. This 1972 exchange shows how the method's early backers checked how well it worked. The exchange also shows how they argued over what counts as a failure. The definition question still shapes how studies report results today. The letter is a historical record. No current outcome data appears in it.

Abstract not indexed.

Topics

By this author

Related research

Fertility Awareness › Methods › Billings Ovulation Method · Menstrual Cycle › Cycle Biomarkers › Basal Body Temperature
PMID 4117608 4117608 DOI 10.1016/s0140-6736(72)92610-4 10.1016/s0140-6736(72)92610-4 Billings et al. 1972, Billings 1972

Cite this article

Billings, J. J. (1972). Ovulation method of family planning. Lancet (London, England), 2(7788), 1193-1194. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0140-6736(72)92610-4