Male Fertility · Semen Analysis

Total motile sperm count: a better indicator for the severity of male factor infertility than the WHO sperm classification system

Hamilton JA, Cissen M, Brandes M, Smeenk JM, de Bruin JP, Kremer JA, Nelen WL, Hamilton CJ

Published May 2015 Human Reproduction (Oxford, England), 30(5), 1110-1121
DOI 10.1093/humrep/dev058 PMID 25788568

RRM Academy Synopsis

Total motile sperm count tracks natural pregnancy better than WHO

Total motile sperm count tracked natural pregnancy more closely than WHO categories in 1177 couples with male factor or unexplained infertility. About 4 out of 10 had a natural ongoing pregnancy within 3 years, some during or after treatment. Among abnormal WHO groups, three comparisons differed significantly. The two lowest count groups had significantly lower rates than a middle group.

Key Findings

  • Of 1177 couples followed for 3 years, 514 (43.7%) had a spontaneous ongoing pregnancy. Of the other 663 couples, 335 became pregnant after treatment and 328 did not become pregnant at all.
  • Every WHO group had a lower spontaneous pregnancy rate than the unexplained infertility group (odds ratios 0.136 to 0.397), adjusted for age, infertility duration and type, and postcoital test.
  • Among abnormal WHO groups, three comparisons were significant: oligoasthenoteratozoospermia had lower odds of pregnancy than teratozoospermia (OR 0.499, 95% CI 0.252–0.988) and asthenozoospermia (OR 0.501, 0.311–0.809); oligoasthenozoospermia than asthenozoospermia (OR 0.572, 0.373–0.877).
  • Every TMSC group had a significantly lower rate than the unexplained group (odds ratios 0.171 to 0.461). Abnormal TMSC groups ranged from 23 to 42%, against 60% for unexplained infertility.
  • The two lowest TMSC groups had significantly lower rates than a middle TMSC group (OR 0.371, 95% CI 0.215–0.64, and OR 0.505, 95% CI 0.307–0.832).

Interpretation

The authors analyzed a longitudinal cohort of unselected couples referred to three Dutch hospitals for a first fertility work-up from 2002 to 2006. They left out couples with female factors or azoospermia. Couples were treated under Dutch guidelines. The authors note that couples were not censored when treatment began, so natural pregnancies during or after treatment count. They chose the count groups themselves because no validated classification exists. The paper reports adjusted odds ratios between groups. The findings support further study of total motile sperm count as a severity marker across broader populations.

RRM Context

Restorative reproductive medicine checks both partners. It reads unexplained infertility as undiagnosed. Here, unexplained meant a normal semen test and no other cause found. The authors say natural pregnancies occur even with extremely poor sperm quality. Natural pregnancies happened in every male factor group.

Abstract

Study Question

Does the prewash total motile sperm count (TMSC) have a better predictive value for spontaneous ongoing pregnancy (SOP) than the World Health Organization (WHO) classification system?

Summary Answer

The prewash TMSC shows a better correlation with the spontaneous ongoing pregnancy rate (SOPR) than the WHO 2010 classification system.

What Is Known Already

According to the WHO classification system, an abnormal semen analysis can be diagnosed as oligozoospermia, astenozoospermia, teratozoospermia or combinations of these and azoospermia. This classification is based on the fifth percentile cut-off values of a cohort of 1953 men with proven fertility. Although this classification suggests accuracy, the relevance for the prognosis of an infertile couple and the choice of treatment is questionable. The TMSC is obtained by multiplying the sample volume by the density and the percentage of A and B motility spermatozoa.

Study Design, Size, Duration

We analyzed data from a longitudinal cohort study among unselected infertile couples who were referred to three Dutch hospitals between January 2002 and December 2006. Of the total cohort of 2476 infertile couples, only the couples with either male infertility as a single diagnosis or unexplained infertility were included (n = 1177) with a follow-up period of 3 years.

Participants/Materials, Setting, Methods

In all couples a semen analysis was performed. Based on the best semen analysis if more tests were performed, couples were grouped according to the WHO classification system and the TMSC range, as described in the Dutch national guidelines for male infertility. The primary outcome measure was the SOPR, which occurred before, during or after treatments, including expectant management, intrauterine insemination, in vitro fertilization or intracytoplasmic sperm injection. After adjustment for the confounding factors (female and male age, duration and type of infertility and result of the postcoital test) the odd ratios (ORs) for risk of SOP for each WHO and TMSC group were calculated. The couples with unexplained infertility were used as reference.

Main Results and the Role of Chance

A total of 514 couples did and 663 couples did not achieve a SOP. All WHO groups have a lower SOPR compared with the unexplained group (ORs varying from 0.136 to 0.397). Comparing the couples within the abnormal WHO groups, there are no significant differences in SOPR, except when oligoasthenoteratozoospermia is compared with asthenozoospermia [OR 0.501 (95% CI 0.311-0.809)] and teratozoospermia [OR 0.499 (95% CI: 0.252-0.988)], and oligoasthenozoospermia is compared with asthenozoospermia [OR 0.572 (95% CI: 0.373-0.877)]. All TMSC groups have a significantly lower SOPR compared with the unexplained group (ORs varying from 0.171 to 0.461). Couples with a TMSC of <1 × 10(6) and 1-5 × 10(6) have significantly lower SOPR compared with couples with a TMSC of 5-10 × 10(6) [respectively, OR 0.371 (95% CI: 0.215-0.64) and OR 0.505 (95% CI: 0.307-0.832)].

Limitations, Reasons for Caution

To include all SOPs during the follow-up period of 3 years, couples were not censured at the start of treatment.

Wider Implications of the Findings

Roughly, three prognostic groups can be discerned: couples with a TMSC <5, couples with a TMSC between 5 and 20 and couples with a TMSC of more than 20 × 10(6) spermatozoa. We suggest using TMSC as the method of choice to express severity of male infertility.

Study Funding/Competing Interests

None.

Topics

By this author

Related research

Male Fertility › Semen Analysis › Reference Standards · Clinical Guidelines and Standards › Diagnostic Criteria and Classification › Staging and Classification Systems
Jan Peter de Bruin
J Bruin
PMID 25788568 25788568 DOI 10.1093/humrep/dev058 10.1093/humrep/dev058 Hamilton et al. 2015, Hamilton 2015