Assisted Reproduction Registries and Reporting

ART in Europe, 2020: results generated from European registries by ESHRE

De Geyter C, Calhaz-Jorge C, Kupka MS, Wyns C, Mocanu E, Motrenko T, Scaravelli G, Smeenk J, Vidakovic S, Goossens V, European IVF-monitoring Consortium (EIM), European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology (ESHRE)

Published November 2025 Human Reproduction
DOI 10.1093/humrep/deaf179 PMID 40985526

RRM Academy Synopsis

Reported ART cycles in Europe fell 14.3% in 2020 across 41 countries

European ART registries reported 14.3% fewer treatment cycles in 2020 than in 2019. This is the 24th annual ESHRE report, covering 1440 clinics in 41 countries. Among reporting countries, fresh IVF and ICSI pregnancy rates per aspiration stayed near 2019 levels. More fresh transfers used one embryo.

Study at a glance, annual registry summary of 923 318 ART treatment cycles: Reported ART cycles in Europe fell 14.3% in 2020
Study at a glance, annual registry summary of 923 318 ART treatment cycles: Reported ART cycles in Europe fell 14.3% in 2020. Source: De Geyter C et al., 2025, PMID 40985526.

Key Findings

  • In 2020, 1440 clinics in 41 countries reported 923 318 ART treatment cycles, down 14.3% from 1 077 813 cycles in 2019.
  • Infants born after ART numbered 182 198 in 2020, compared with 203 665 in 2019.
  • Among reporting countries, clinical pregnancy rates per aspiration, freeze-all cycles included, were 22.1% for IVF (21.8% in 2019) and 20.0% for ICSI (20.2% in 2019).
  • Fresh IVF and ICSI transfers used a single embryo in 57.2% of treatments (55.4% in 2019), and twin deliveries fell to 10.9% (11.9% in 2019).
  • Adding frozen transfers made within the same year, the crude cumulative delivery rate per aspiration was 32.3% (31.4% in 2019) across 36 countries.

Interpretation

The report is an annual registry summary. Countries send aggregate data from national registries or from registries run by medical associations, scientific organizations or committed persons, and the consortium compiles them. The 2020 figures are compared with 2019. The authors say the fall could be due to the COVID pandemic and/or to some countries being unable to report. The UK, Cyprus and Romania sent no data, and 1440 of 1744 known IVF clinics reported. The authors note that patient mix has shifted over the years and that the registry cannot calculate true cumulative rates. The report is not externally peer reviewed.

RRM Context

The registry counts cycles and births after ART, which bypasses infertility without finding why conception fails. Its totals hold no diagnosis data. Restorative reproductive medicine starts by finding and treating the cause of infertility in both partners. A registry of cycle counts has nothing to say on that question.

Abstract

Study Question

What are the data and trends of ART and IUI cycle numbers and their outcomes, and of fertility preservation (FP) interventions, reported in 2020 as compared to previous years?

Summary Answer

This 24th ESHRE report highlights the number of ART treatment cycles and children born over the years, showing a decline in the total number of treatment cycles, when comparing 2020 with 2019, alongside a decline in twin deliveries owing to a decrease in transfers of multiple embryos; however, fresh IVF or ICSI cycles and frozen embryo transfers (FET) showed similar pregnancy rates, and the reported IUI cycle numbers decreased while maintaining stable outcomes.

What Is Known Already

ART aggregated data generated by national registries, clinics, or professional societies have been gathered and analyzed by the European IVF Monitoring (EIM) consortium since 1997 and reported in a total of 23 manuscripts published in Human Reproduction and Human Reproduction Open.

Study Design, Size, Duration

Data on medically assisted reproduction (MAR) from European countries are collected by EIM for ESHRE each year. The data on treatment cycles performed between January 1 and December 31, 2020, were provided by either national registries or registries based on initiatives of medical associations and scientific organizations or committed persons in the 44 countries that are members of the EIM Consortium.

Participants/Materials, Setting, Methods

Overall, 1440 clinics offering ART services in 41 countries reported 923 318 treatment cycles (-14%; in 2019: 1 077 813), including 135 231 with IVF, 356 408 with ICSI, 305 373 with FET, 57 051 with preimplantation genetic testing (PGT), 64 007 with oocyte donation, 353 with IVM of oocytes, and 4895 cycles using frozen oocytes. A total of 1288 institutions reported data on IUI cycles using either husband/partner's semen (IUI-H; n = 112 663) or donor semen (IUI-D; n = 38 839) in 30 and 21 countries, respectively. Sixteen countries reported 29 566 interventions in pre-and post-pubertal patients for FP, including oocyte, ovarian tissue, semen, and testicular tissue banking.

Main Results and the Role of Chance

In 24 countries (21 in 2019) in which all ART clinics reported to the registry, 356 427 treatment cycles were registered for a total population of approximately 268 million inhabitants in these countries, allowing the best estimate of a mean of 1330 cycles performed per million inhabitants (range: 142-3230). Among the reporting countries, for IVF, the clinical pregnancy rates (PR) per aspiration were similar to that in 2019 (22.1% versus 21.8% in 2019). For ICSI, the corresponding PRs showed similar trends (20.0% in 2020 versus 20.2% in 2019). When freeze-all cycles were excluded from the calculations, the clinical PRs per aspiration were 26.4% (28.5% in 2019) and 25.6% (26.2% in 2019) for IVF and ICSI, respectively. After oocyte donation, the PR per embryo transfer was 51.3% (50.5% in 2019) with freshly donated oocytes and 45.7% (44.8% in 2019) with thawed oocytes. After FET, the PR per thawing was 34.9% (versus 35.1% in 2019). In fresh cycles of both IVF and ICSI, the trend towards the transfer of fewer embryos continued with the transfer of 1, 2, 3, and ≥4 embryos in 57.2%, 37.8%, 4.8%, and 0.2%, of all treatments, respectively (corresponding to 55.4%, 39.9%, 2.6%, and 0.2% in 2019). This resulted in a reduced proportion of twin delivery rates (DRs) of 10.9% (11.9% in 2019) and a similar triplet DR of 0.2%. In FET cycles in 2020, the twin and triplet DRs were 7.9% and 0.1%, respectively (versus 8.9% and 0.1% in 2019). While the number of IUI cycles in 2020 decreased from 2019, the DRs remained stable at 8.8% after IUI-H (8.7% in 2019) and at 12.5% after IUI-D (12.1% in 2019). Twin and triplet DRs after IUI-H were 7.9% and 0.4% (in 2019: 8.7% and 0.4%) and 5.7% % and 0.1% after IUI-D (in 2019: 6.2% and 0.2%), respectively. Data on FP were provided by 16 countries (18 in 2019), reporting a total of 29 566 interventions (24 139 in 2019). Cryopreservation of ejaculated sperm (n = 21 864 versus n = 11 592 in 2019) and cryopreservation of oocytes (n = 6077 versus n = 10 784 in 2019) were the most frequently reported forms of FP.

Limitations, Reasons for Caution

Caution with the interpretation of results should remain as data collection systems and completeness of reporting vary among European countries. Some countries were unable to deliver data about the number of initiated cycles and/or deliveries.

Wider Implications of the Findings

The 24th ESHRE data collection on ART and IUI interventions shows a decrease of reported treatment cycles. A decline was observed when comparing 2020 with 2019, regarding the numbers of MAR treatments and births derived from these treatments in Europe. This break in the trend from prior years could be due to the effects of the COVID pandemic and/or due to the fact that some countries were not able to report. Although it is the largest data collection on MAR in Europe, further efforts to optimize both the collection and the reporting of data, from the perspective of improving surveillance and vigilance in the field of reproductive medicine, are awaited.

Study Funding/Competing Interests

The study has received no external funding and all costs are covered by ESHRE. There are no competing interests.

Read the guide

Topics

By this author

Related research

Assisted Reproduction › Registries and Reporting › National Registry Data
Christian De Geyter, Carlos Calhaz-Jorge, Christine Wyns, Edgar Mocanu, Veerle Goossens
C Geyter, C Calhaz-Jorge, Chris Wyns, C Wyns, E Mocanu, V Goossens
PMID 40985526 40985526 DOI 10.1093/humrep/deaf179 10.1093/humrep/deaf179 De Geyter et al. 2025, De Geyter 2025