Serial progesterone measurement timed to the luteal phase and early pregnancy using CrMS Peak Day-referenced protocols reveals luteal insufficiency and early placental progesterone inadequacy that are associated with miscarriage risk and preterm labor. Progesterone supplementation guided by these standardized assessments has been associated with reduced pregnancy loss in NaProTECHNOLOGY-managed pregnancies, and the chapter details the specific drawing protocols, reference ranges, and supplementation decision thresholds used in clinical practice.
normal progesterone levels by trimester in pregnancy, low progesterone second trimester placenta, does progesterone indicate placental function, progesterone levels and miscarriage risk, history of PCOS and low progesterone in pregnancy, progesterone levels twin pregnancy, smoking and progesterone in pregnancy, low progesterone and preterm labor risk
Hilgers et al. 2004, Hilgers 2004
Cite this article
Hilgers, T. W. (2004). Chapter 54: Assessing Progesterone During Pregnancy. The Medical and Surgical Practice of NaProTECHNOLOGY, 713-724.
Hilgers TW. Chapter 54: Assessing Progesterone During Pregnancy. The Medical and Surgical Practice of NaProTECHNOLOGY. 2004:713-724.
Hilgers, T. W. "Chapter 54: Assessing Progesterone During Pregnancy." The Medical and Surgical Practice of NaProTECHNOLOGY, 2004, pp. 713-724.
Hilgers TW, 2004·The Medical and Surgical Practice of NaProTECHNOLOGY
A CrMS-synchronized hormone sampling protocol is detailed in which progesterone, estradiol, and other reproductive hormones are drawn at cycle-phase-specific time points defined by the charted Peak Day rather than by fixed cycle day, producing a targeted hormone profile that accurately reflects luteal and follicular function. This Peak Day-referenced approach substantially improves the diagnostic sensitivity for luteal phase deficiency, follicular dysfunction, and other endocrine abnormalities that fixed-day sampling routinely misclassifies.
Hilgers TW, 2004·The Medical and Surgical Practice of NaProTECHNOLOGY
Normal estradiol and progesterone reference ranges in NaProTECHNOLOGY are derived from fertile, ovulatory cycles with confirmed CrMS Peak days and sonographic ovulation, with blood sampling timed to Peak-anchored days (pre-ovulatory P-days for estradiol, P+3 through P+11 for luteal hormones) rather than to calendar cycle days. These day-specific normative values allow detection of subtle deficiencies -- such as a blunted progesterone rise at P+5 or inadequate pre-ovulatory estradiol -- that are clinically actionable for diagnosing follicular and luteal phase disorders but are invisible to standard mid-luteal or phase-independent reference intervals.
DeMayo FJ et al., 2020·Journal of molecular endocrinology
Progesterone's ability to maintain pregnancy in eutherian mammals highlighted this steroid as the 'hormone of pregnancy'. It was the unique 'pro-gestational' bioactivity of progesterone that enabled eventual purification of this ovarian steroid to crystalline form by Willard Myron Allen in the early 1930s. While a functional connection between normal progesterone responses ('progestational proliferation') of the uterus with the maintenance of pregnancy was quickly appreciated, an understanding of progesterone's involvement in the early stages of pregnancy establishment was comparatively less well understood. With the aforementioned as historical backdrop, this review focuses on a selection of key advances in our understanding of the molecular mechanisms by which progesterone, through its nuclear receptor (the progesterone receptor), drives the development of endometrial receptivity, a transient uterine state that allows for embryo implantation and the establishment of pregnancy. Highlighted in this review are the significant contributions of advanced mouse engineering and genome-wide transcriptomic and cistromic analytics which reveal the pivotal molecular mediators and modifiers that are essential to progesterone-dependent endometrial receptivity and decidualization. With a clearer understanding of the molecular landscape that underpins uterine responsiveness to progesterone during the periimplantation period, we predict that common gynecologic morbidities due to abnormal progesterone responsiveness will be more effectively diagnosed and/or treated in the future.
pregnancy/early-pregnancy/progesterone-supporttherapeutics/hormonal-agents/progesterone-and-progestinsreproductive-endocrinology/ovarian-hormones/progesterone
Open Access
Progesterone is essential for the maintenance of pregnancy. Several small trials have suggested that progesterone supplementation may reduce the risk of miscarriage in women with recurrent or threatened miscarriage. Cochrane Reviews summarized the evidence and found that the trials were small with substantial methodologic weaknesses. Since then, the effects of first-trimester use of vaginal micronized progesterone have been evaluated in 2 large, high-quality, multicenter placebo-controlled trials, one targeting women with unexplained recurrent miscarriages (the PROMISE [PROgesterone in recurrent MIScarriagE] trial) and the other targeting women with early pregnancy bleeding (the PRISM [PRogesterone In Spontaneous Miscarriage] trial). The PROMISE trial studied 836 women from 45 hospitals in the United Kingdom and the Netherlands and found a 3% greater live birth rate with progesterone but with substantial statistical uncertainty. The PRISM trial studied 4153 women from 48 hospitals in the United Kingdom and found a 3% greater live birth rate with progesterone, but with a P value of .08. A key finding, first observed in the PROMISE trial, and then replicated in the PRISM trial, was that treatment with vaginal micronized progesterone 400 mg twice daily was associated with increasing live birth rates according to the number of previous miscarriages. Prespecified PRISM trial subgroup analysis in women with the dual risk factors of previous miscarriage(s) and current pregnancy bleeding fulfilled all 11 conditions for credible subgroup analysis. For the subgroup of women with a history of 1 or more miscarriage(s) and current pregnancy bleeding, the live birth rate was 75% (689/914) with progesterone vs 70% (619/886) with placebo (rate difference 5%; risk ratio, 1.09, 95% confidence interval, 1.03-1.15; P=.003). The benefit was greater for the subgroup of women with 3 or more previous miscarriages and current pregnancy bleeding; live birth rate was 72% (98/137) with progesterone vs 57% (85/148) with placebo (rate difference 15%; risk ratio, 1.28, 95% confidence interval, 1.08-1.51; P=.004). No short-term safety concerns were identified from the PROMISE and PRISM trials. Therefore, women with a history of miscarriage who present with bleeding in early pregnancy may benefit from the use of vaginal micronized progesterone 400 mg twice daily. Women and their care providers should use the findings for shared decision-making.