Luteal Phase · Corpus Luteum Function
Lipson SF et al., 1994 · Fertil Steril
To establish age-stratified reference values for salivary luteal P levels. One hundred thirty-six regularly menstruating women (18 to 48 years of age), screened for weight, exercise, and steroid medication use, collected daily saliva samples for one complete menstrual cycle. Luteal P levels were measured by 3H-RIA, and data were aligned by day of next menstrual onset. Means (+/- 1 SD range) and percentiles, calculated using both untransformed and log transformed data, were calculated for each luteal day and for indices of luteal P production. Reference values for salivary daily luteal P levels and indices of luteal P are presented for three age groups (18 to 24 years, 25 to 39 years, and 40 to 48 years). The age-stratified reference values presented here can be used, without collateral clinical procedures, to assess salivary luteal P levels. Salivary monitoring is ideally suited for research and long-term clinical observation, but the characteristics of salivary P data may limit the usefulness of these values for individual diagnosis.
Luteal Phase · Corpus Luteum Function
Abraham GE et al., 1974 · Obstet Gynecol
To develop a practical yet statistically valid means of indicating ovulation and adequacy of corpus luteum function concentrations of plasma progesterone (P) were measured daily during the luteal phase of 30 normal and abnormal menstrual cycles. During a normal cycle any 3 P measurements taken from 11 days before the first day of the following menses (M) to Day M-4 gave a total equal to or greater than 15 ng/ml. An abnormal cycle was considered one in which the total P (for 3 measurements) was less than 15 ng. Individual levels were often at 3 ng/ml in normal cycle and above 3 ng/ml in abnormal cycles indicating that the single P measurement proposed by Israel et. al. would not always be valid.
Luteal Phase · Luteal Phase Deficiency
Olive DL et al., 1989 · Fertil Steril
The authors have further analyzed women diagnosed as having luteal phase insufficiency in hope of determining the value of specific screening tests as well as determining the degree of heterogeneity of pathophysiologic mechanisms involved in the disorder. Twelve women with the disorder were identified, 6 with two consecutive midluteal serum progesterone (P) levels less than 10 ng/ml (group 1) and 6 with two consecutive late luteal phase endometrial biopsies out of phase (group 2); 4 infertile women with normal serum P and late luteal biopsies also were studied (group 3). All underwent serum sampling for P and luteinizing hormone (LH) at 20-minute intervals for 24 hours, beginning at 9:00 A.M. of day 7 post-LH surge. No significant differences were noted among the three groups for LH area under the curve, pulse frequency, or pulse amplitude. Furthermore, no differences were ascertained for P area under the curve. However, individuals were identified who had one or more hormonal abnormalities but no abnormal biopsy, as well as patients with normal hormonal profiles but having abnormal endometrial development. Receiver Operating Characteristic curves demonstrated that pooled morning serum P levels provided optimal predictive ability of biopsy results. The authors conclude that luteal phase insufficiency is a heterogeneous disorder, and that neither endometrial biopsy nor serum hormonal analysis obviates the need for the other.
Luteal Phase · Luteal Phase Deficiency
Hinney B et al., 1996 · J Clin Endocrinol Metab
The pulsatile release pattern of LH during the entire menstrual cycle is well defined; however, the response of corpora lutea to these LH pulses in patients suffering from corpus luteum insufficiencies (CLI) is largely unknown. Patients suffering from CLI were selected from infertile patients on the basis of low progesterone (P < 25 nmol/L) in a blood sample withdrawn during a monitoring cycle. During the next cycle, nine blood samples were collected during the follicular and luteal phase and follicular development was assessed by vaginal sonography. Of 109 patients who had a CLI in the monitoring cycle, 55 had a CLI again, and 38 women agreed to undergo assessment of pulsatile hormone secretion. These women again had P < 25 nmol/L at days 6 and 7 of the luteal phase and blood samples were withdrawn through antecubital vein catheters from 0900-1700 h at 10-min intervals on days 7, 8, or 9 following ovulation. From 38 patients with such defined CLI, 16 (42%) had no LH episode and significantly lower basal LH levels in comparison with 14 control subjects. Thirteen (34%) of the patients had normal appearing LH episodes despite too low P and E2 concentrations, but their CL did not react to the LH episodes. The remaining 9 patients (24%) had normal LH episodes; their CL reacted to these episodes, but their basal P levels were too low. In all blood samples LH was not only determined using an immunoassay but also by the mouse Leydig cell testosterone production bioassay. It could be established that no CLI exists, which is due to the release of bioinactive LH. It is anticipated that the differentiation of three different types of CLI, one of hypothalamic and two of ovarian origin, may allow the development of differential diagnostic and therapeutic tools in the future.
03bea9k73