Norplant

Hilgers TW

doi:10.1080/20508549.1993.11878191

The Linacre Quarterly, 60(1), 64-69, 1993

Norplant

Thomas Hilgers

Author affiliations

Institute for Human Reproduction ROR

DOI10.1080/20508549.1993.11878191

Read at source

Abstract

No abstract available for this article.

Topics

Contraception/Comparison > Hormonal Methods > Implants Ethics/Philosophy > Catholic Medical Ethics > Contraceptive Evaluation

Norplant levonorgestrel implant contraception review, Hilgers Norplant contraceptive analysis, Norplant subdermal implant long-acting contraception, progestin implant contraceptive ethics Catholic perspective, Norplant side effects long-acting reversible contraception, Hilgers TW contraception Linacre Quarterly, Norplant hormonal contraception ethical evaluation, implantable contraceptive Norplant safety efficacy review, Catholic medical ethics hormonal contraception Norplant

DOI 10.1080/20508549.1993.11878191 10.1080/20508549.1993.11878191

Cite this article

Hilgers, T. W. (1993). Norplant. *The Linacre Quarterly*, *60*(1), 64-69. https://doi.org/10.1080/20508549.1993.11878191

Norplant

Abstract

Topics

Cite this article

Related articles

The State of the Science of Natural Family Planning: A Report from NFP Scientists' Meeting Held in Orlando, FL, September 4, 2024

Evaluating Pregnancy Rates in Fertility Awareness-Based Methods for Family Planning: Simulated Comparison of Correct Use to Avoid, Method-Related, and Total Pregnancy Rates

Effectiveness of a Postpartum Breastfeeding Protocol for Avoiding Pregnancy

A Pilot Qualitative Case Study of Women's Experiences with Fertility Awareness-Based Methods