Bone Health · Hormones and Bone

Premenopausal ovariectomy-related bone loss: a randomized, double-blind, one-year trial of conjugated estrogen or medroxyprogesterone acetate

Prior JC, Vigna YM, Wark JD, Eyre DR, Lentle BC, Li DK, Ebeling PR, Atley L

Published November 1997 Journal of Bone and Mineral Research : the Official Journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research, 12(11), 1851-1863
DOI 10.1359/jbmr.1997.12.11.1851 PMID 9383690

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to contrast the effects of conventional estrogen treatment with medroxyprogesterone on cancellous and cortical bone change in the first year following premenopausal ovariectomy. This 1-year double-blind randomized therapy trial was stratified by osteoporosis family history and performed in an academic medical center and community hospitals. Premenopausal women 45 +/- 5 years old, postovariectomy for benign diseases were provided 600 mg/day of calcium and randomized to daily therapy with conjugated equine estrogen (CEE, 0.6 mg) or medroxyprogesterone (MPA, 10 mg). The primary outcome variable was spinal quantitative computed tomography (QCT) bone density change over 1 year with additional outcomes of dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) of proximal femur (FN), whole body (WB), and spine segment (WBS) and N-telopeptide, bone-specific alkaline phosphatase, and other bone marker, hormonal, and weight changes. Results in the 33 women completing the study, whose initial bone densities were normal (QCT 133 mg/cm3, femoral neck 0.94 g/cm2, whole body DXA 1.13 g/cm2), showed annual QCT loss during CEE therapy of -11.5 mg/cm3 (p < 0.0007) and MPA bone loss of -19.7 mg/cm3 (p < 0.0001). Losses were marginally greater on MPA than CEE (p = 0.04). Extremely high postovariectomy (5 days) and pretreatment resorption markers (> 3 SD above premenopausal normal levels) were significantly related to bone loss. Across the year, resorption decreased during CEE but increased on MPA treatment. Significant DXA bone losses were prevented by CEE treatment (-1.4% FN, -.4% WB, and -1.5% WBS, all NS). However, DXA bone loss was not prevented by MPA treatment (-5% FN, -2.8% WB, and -6.1% WBS, all p < 0.03). Average weight gain was significant (+ 3.2 +/- 4.0 kg) and greater on CEE than MPA (+ 4.7 vs. + 2.0 kg, p = 0.049). In conclusion, CEE therapy did not prevent significant 8% cancellous spinal bone loss in the first year following premenopausal ovariectomy, despite supplementation with 600 mg/day of calcium, good control of vasomotor symptoms, and nearly 5 kg of gain in weight. Significant DXA bone loss, however, was prevented by CEE, but not by MPA therapy. These unexpected results were statistically related to high bone resorption following ovariectomy, which CEE suppressed but MPA did not. Bone formation markers increased during MPA therapy but were unchanged during CEE therapy.

Topics

By this author

Related research

Bone Health › Hormones and Bone › Estrogen and Bone · Therapeutics › Hormonal Agents › Estrogen Preparations · Perimenopause and Menopause › Hormone Therapy › Benefits and Risks
Jerilynn C. Prior, Yvette M. Vigna, John D. Wark, David R. Eyre, Brian C. Lentle, David K. B. Li, Peter R. Ebeling, Lynne Atley
J Prior, Y Vigna, Jack Wark, J Wark, Dave Eyre, D Eyre, B Lentle, Dave Li, D Li, Pete Ebeling, P Ebeling, L Atley
PMID 9383690 9383690 DOI 10.1359/jbmr.1997.12.11.1851 10.1359/jbmr.1997.12.11.1851 Prior et al. 1997, Prior 1997