Smith, M., Aghayan, M., Little, J., Prior, J. C., Cohen, T. R., Soon, Z., Bomide, H., & Purcell, S. (2026). Energy intake and appetite in laboratory and free-living conditions may be consistent across menstrual cycle phases. Appetite, 216, 108314. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appet.2025.108314
Smith M, Aghayan M, Little J, Prior JC, Cohen TR, Soon Z, et al. Energy intake and appetite in laboratory and free-living conditions may be consistent across menstrual cycle phases. Appetite. 2026;216:108314. doi:10.1016/j.appet.2025.108314
Smith, M., et al. "Energy intake and appetite in laboratory and free-living conditions may be consistent across menstrual cycle phases." Appetite, vol. 216, 2026, pp. 108314.
For EndNote, Zotero or Mendeley:
License
No open license is recorded for this paper. Reuse terms are set by the publisher.
Faculty of Medicine, Department of Medicine, Southern Medical Program, Centre for Chronic Disease Prevention and Management, Kelowna, BC, V1V 1V7, Canada; Faculty of Health and Social Development, ...
Department of Pathology, Southern Regional Area Health Education Center, Fayetteville, North Carolina, USA.0036ate90
University of British Columbia, Okanagan Campus04241wz75
Linked to ROR, the Research Organization Registry
Abstract
Background
Self-reported dietary intake varies across menstrual cycle phases, but objective assessments of dietary intake together with appetite and resting metabolic rate (RMR) are limited. This study aimed to assess differences in dietary intake, appetite, and RMR during two hormonally-distinct menstrual cycle phases in laboratory and free-living settings.
Methods
Healthy premenopausal females with predictable normal-length menstrual cycles completed two study visits: one in the late-follicular and one in the mid-luteal phase. Menstrual cycle phases were assessed using urinary luteinizing hormone surge and prospective cycle days. Participants consumed a 2-day energyand macronutrient-balanced run-in diet prior to each visit. RMR was measured with indirect calorimetry, followed by appetite ratings before and after a standardized breakfast, and a food cravings questionnaire. Appetite was also tracked for 2.5 days post-visit in a free-living environment. Ad libitum energy and macronutrient intakes were measured using pre-weighed plus weighing of uneaten food at an in-laboratory lunch meal, as well as during the 2.5-day free-living period.
Results
Eighteen participants were included (age: 21 ± 4 years; body mass index: 21.2 ± 1.5 kg/m2). There were no differences between in-laboratory ad libitum energy or macronutrient intakes, appetite, or food cravings between phases. RMR did not differ between phases, although the mid-luteal phase RMR tended to be higher (104 ± 218 kcal/day higher; P = 0.074). No main or interaction effects for phase or time were observed for free-living dietary intake nor appetite ratings.
Conclusions
Although RMR tended to be increased during the luteal phase, comprehensive appetite and energy intake assessments showed no significant cycle-phase differences in these 18 participants.
Guthardt Y et al., 2026·Sci Rep·Free full text on PubMed Central
This systematic review and meta-analysis examined the relationship between menstrual cycle phases and the incidence of muscle injuries in female team sport athletes, following PRISMA 2020 and PERSiST guidelines. A comprehensive search was conducted in PubMed, Scopus, and SPORTDiscus from inception to mid-January 2024. Studies were included if they examined female team sport athletes of reproductive age with regular menstrual cycles and compared the occurrence of muscle injuries across at least two menstrual phases. Studies involving hormonal contraceptive use, medications affecting the menstrual cycle or musculoskeletal system, or menstrual dysfunction were excluded. Three studies met the inclusion criteria, involving 318 participants. Meta-analysis yielded a pooled Risk Ratio of 1.18 (95% CI: 0.75 to 1.86, p = 0.46) for injury risk between the luteal and follicular phases, suggesting no statistically significant association. However, the certainty of the cumulative evidence was rated as very low due to methodological limitations, including inconsistent phase classifications and reliance on imprecise methods for identifying menstrual phases. Consequently, no practical or clinical recommendations can be made at this time. Future research employing standardised, physiologically accurate methods for classifying and detecting menstrual cycle phases is necessary to better understand the potential links between hormonal fluctuations and injury risk.
We compared energy and macronutrient intakes across the menstrual cycle in participants (n = 42) in a study that assessed the frequency of ovulatory disturbances in regularly cycling vegetarians and nonvegetarians. Women kept daily basal body temperature records for six consecutive menstrual cycles and provided 3-d diet records near the beginning, middle, and end of different cycles. On completion of the study, temperature records were quantitatively analyzed to determine whether cycles were ovulatory, and if so, the date the luteal phase began. Diet records kept near the beginning and end of cycles were matched with temperature analysis results, and women were grouped according to whether the end-of-cycle record was kept during the luteal phase of an ovulatory cycle (group 1, n = 29), or during an anovulatory cycle or before luteal phase onset of a short luteal phase cycle (group 2, n = 13). Group 1 had higher energy intakes during the luteal than during the follicular phase (9.27 +/- 2.69 vs 8.01 +/- 2.36 MJ/d, P < 0.0001), whereas intakes of group 2 did not differ across the cycle (7.91 +/- 2.18 vs 8.20 +/- 1.48 MJ/d, NS). Both groups' macronutrient intakes were similar in records kept near the beginning and end of cycles. Documentation of ovulation is necessary in studies assessing premenopausal women's energy intakes.
Algars M et al., 2014·Journal of psychosomatic research·Free full text on PubMed Central
The relation between eating disorders and menstrual function has been widely studied, but it is unknown whether the behavior of binge eating itself is related to menstrual dysfunction. The 11,503 women included in this study were from the Swedish Twin study of Adults: Genes and Environment. The associations between menstrual dysfunction and binge eating were analyzed using logistic regression or multiple linear regression models with generalized estimation equations. Women who reported lifetime binge eating were more likely to report either amenorrhea or oligomenorrhea than women who reported no binge eating. These results persisted when controlling for compensatory behaviors including self-induced vomiting, laxative use, and diuretic use. No differences between women with and without a history of binge eating were observed for age at menarche. Even when controlling for the effect of compensatory behaviors, the behavior of binge eating is associated with menstrual dysfunction. Metabolic and endocrinological factors could underlie this association. Careful evaluation of menstrual status is warranted for women with all eating disorders, not just anorexia nervosa.
Imprecise measures of ovulation obscure the relationship between women's sexuality and the menstrual cycle, as does studying women with different contraceptive goals in different social contexts. Here we present a novel noninvasive method to precisely pinpoint the preovulatory surge of Luteinizing Hormone (LH), demarcating hormonally distinct cycle phases with greater than 95% reliability. Women were more sexually active on days prior to and including the preovulatory (LH) surge. This pattern was evident only when women initiated sexual activity and not when their partners did, indicating an increase in women's sexual motivation rather than attractiveness. A second study replicated the 6-day increase in sexual activity beginning 3 days before the LH surge, accompanied by stronger sexual desire and more sexual fantasies. We propose the term 'sexual phase' of the cycle, since follicular phase is over inclusive and ovulatory phase is not sufficient. These findings are striking because the women were avoiding pregnancy and were kept blind to the hypotheses, preventing expectation bias. The sexual phase was more robust in women with regular sexual partners, although the increase in sexual desire was just as great in nonpartnered women, who also reported feeling less lonely at this time. We use these results to evaluate potential neuroendocrine mechanisms underlying women's sexual motivation and activity.
Menstrual Cycle › Cycle Physiology › Hormonal Regulation · Lifestyle and Environment › Nutrition and Metabolic Health › Dietary Patterns · Reproductive Endocrinology › Ovarian Hormones › Progesterone
Maryam Aghayan, Jerilynn C Prior, Tamara R Cohen, Hephzibah Bomide, Jonathan Little, Sarah Purcell, Miranda Smith, Zoë Soon
M Aghayan, J Prior, T Cohen, H Bomide, Jon Little, J Little, S Purcell, M Smith, Z Soon
PMID 41005066 41005066 DOI 10.1016/j.appet.2025.108314 10.1016/j.appet.2025.108314 Smith et al. 2026, Smith 2026
Cite this article
Smith, M., Aghayan, M., Little, J., Prior, J. C., Cohen, T. R., Soon, Z., Bomide, H., & Purcell, S. (2026). Energy intake and appetite in laboratory and free-living conditions may be consistent across menstrual cycle phases. Appetite, 216, 108314. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appet.2025.108314
Smith M, Aghayan M, Little J, Prior JC, Cohen TR, Soon Z, et al. Energy intake and appetite in laboratory and free-living conditions may be consistent across menstrual cycle phases. Appetite. 2026;216:108314. doi:10.1016/j.appet.2025.108314
Smith, M., et al. "Energy intake and appetite in laboratory and free-living conditions may be consistent across menstrual cycle phases." Appetite, vol. 216, 2026, pp. 108314.