Pregnancy Early Pregnancy

Progesterone in Women with Recurrent Miscarriages

Carpentier PA, Stanford JB, Boyle PC

Published March 3, 2016 The New England Journal of Medicine, 374(9), 894
DOI 10.1056/NEJMc1600491 PMID 26962922

In response to A Randomized Trial of Progesterone in Women with Recurrent Miscarriages (Coomarasamy A et al., 2015)

RRM Academy Synopsis

Pre-implantation progesterone merits study in recurrent miscarriage

In a 2016 letter to the editor, three physicians argue that progesterone started before implantation deserves study in women with recurrent miscarriage and reduced fertility. They respond to PROMISE, a randomized trial of women with three or more miscarriages. In that trial, progesterone began after implantation.

Study at a glance, letter to the editor: Letter asks for study of progesterone started before implantation
Study at a glance, letter to the editor of women with recurrent miscarriage: Letter asks for study of progesterone started before implantation. Source: Carpentier PA et al., 2016, PMID 26962922.

Key Findings

  • The letter suggests that correcting a luteal-phase defect ahead of implantation may raise the chance of an ongoing pregnancy.
  • Women in fertility treatment commonly receive progesterone before and during implantation, the letter notes, while PROMISE began it afterward.
  • Reduced fertility led to the exclusion of 515 of the 1568 women screened for PROMISE, nearly 33%.
  • Cited reports associate a luteal phase shorter than 10 days with a lower probability of clinical pregnancy, and the letter adds that it may also be associated with miscarriage.
  • In reply, the PROMISE authors say the trial tested first-trimester progesterone because it is common practice, and they agree the luteal-phase question merits further research.

Interpretation

The item is a 2016 letter to the editor in the New England Journal of Medicine, with a reply from the PROMISE authors. The letter concerns women with recurrent miscarriage and reduced fertility, who were excluded from the trial, and women with a short luteal phase. The PROMISE authors reply that progesterone use in the luteal phase is rare and that the question merits further research. The letter's authors call for investigation of progesterone before pregnancy testing in women with reduced fertility, a luteal-phase defect, or both.

RRM Context

Restorative reproductive medicine evaluates the menstrual cycle before pregnancy and treats the cause of a problem. Cycle charting shows how long the luteal phase lasts, so a short one can be found early. The letter applies this principle to recurrent miscarriage and directs attention to the time before implantation.

Abstract not indexed.

Topics

By this author

Related research

Pregnancy › Early Pregnancy › Progesterone Support · Reproductive Endocrinology › Ovarian Hormones › Progesterone · Therapeutics › Hormonal Agents › Progesterone and Progestins
Paul A Carpentier, Joseph B Stanford, Phil C Boyle
P Carpentier, Joe Stanford, Joey Stanford, J Stanford, Philip Boyle, Phillip Boyle, P Boyle
PMID 26962922 26962922 DOI 10.1056/NEJMc1600491 10.1056/NEJMc1600491 Carpentier et al. 2016, Carpentier 2016