Reproductive Endocrinology · Luteal Phase

Dietary factors and luteal phase deficiency in healthy eumenorrheic women

Andrews MA, Wactawski-Wende J, Zarek SM, Radin RG, Sjaarda LA, Perkins NJ, Kalwerisky RA, Hammoud AO, Mumford SL, Stanford JB, Schliep KC

Published August 2015 Human Reproduction (Oxford, England), 30(8), 1942-1951
DOI 10.1093/humrep/dev133 PMID 26082480 PMC PMC4507331

RRM Academy Synopsis

Higher Mediterranean diet scores linked to luteal phase deficiency

A cohort study of 246 healthy women with regular cycles found that a higher Mediterranean Diet Score went with higher odds of luteal phase deficiency. The condition meant a luteal phase under 10 days. About 9 out of 100 cycles met it. After adjustment, higher selenium intake went with lower odds. The authors call the findings exploratory.

Key Findings

  • Luteal phase deficiency, a luteal phase shorter than 10 days, occurred in 41 (8.9%) of 463 cycles from 246 women.
  • Each one-point higher Mediterranean Diet Score went with higher odds of luteal phase deficiency: adjusted odds ratio (aOR) 1.70 (95% CI: 1.17, 2.48).
  • Higher selenium intake was inversely associated with luteal phase deficiency: aOR 0.80 (95% CI: 0.65, 0.97).
  • In adjusted models, fiber showed aOR 1.10 (95% CI: 0.99, 1.23) and isoflavones aOR 1.38 (95% CI: 0.99, 1.92). Both intervals include 1.
  • Further adjustment for hard exercise, stress ratings and sleep left the estimates essentially unchanged.

Interpretation

The BioCycle Study followed women for one or two cycles and recorded what they ate. The design can show association only. The 41 luteal phase deficiency cycles were few, and the authors call the findings exploratory. Participants were healthy women aged 18 to 44 with regular cycles, and medical history was self-reported. Diet came from 24-hour recalls. The study was observational and tested no diet intervention. The authors could not say which part of the Mediterranean score drove the result and call for further research.

RRM Context

The study dated ovulation from the LH surge, found by fertility monitor or blood test, to count luteal days. Charting gives similar cycle information. The authors cite earlier work linking low energy availability to luteal phase deficiency. Restorative reproductive medicine treats a short luteal phase as a reason to look for its cause.

Abstract

Study Question

Are prospectively assessed dietary factors, including overall diet quality, macronutrients and micronutrients, associated with luteal phase deficiency (LPD) in healthy reproductive aged women with regular menstrual cycles?

Summary Answer

Mediterranean Diet Score (MDS), fiber and isoflavone intake were positively associated with LPD while selenium was negatively associated with LPD after adjusting for age, percentage body fat and total energy intake.

What Is Known Already

LPD may increase the risk of infertility and early miscarriage. Prior research has shown positive associations between LPD and low energy availability, either through high dietary restraint alone or in conjunction with high energy expenditure via exercise, but few studies with adequate sample sizes have been conducted investigating dietary factors and LPD among healthy, eumenorrheic women.

Study Design, Size, Duration

The BioCycle Study (2005-2007) prospectively enrolled 259 women from Western New York state, USA, and followed them for one (n = 9) or two (n = 250) menstrual cycles.

Participants/Materials, Setting, Methods

Women aged 18-44 years, with self-reported BMI between 18 and 35 kg/m(2) and cycle lengths between 21 and 35 days, were included in the study. Participants completed baseline questionnaires, four 24-h dietary recalls per cycle and daily diaries capturing vigorous exercise, perceived stress and sleep; they also provided up to eight fasting serum samples during clinic visits timed to specific phases of the menstrual cycle using a fertility monitor. Cycles were included for this analysis if the peak serum luteal progesterone was >1 ng/ml and a urine or serum LH surge was detected. Associations between prospectively assessed diet quality, macronutrients and micronutrients and LPD (defined as luteal duration <10 days) were evaluated using generalized linear models adjusting for age, percentage body fat and total energy intake.

Main Results and the Role of Chance

LPD occurred in 41 (8.9%) of the 463 cycles from 246 women in the final analysis. After adjusting for age, percentage body fat and total energy intake, LPD was positively associated with MDS, adjusted odds ratio (aOR): 1.70 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.17, 2.48), P = 0.01. In separate macro- and micronutrient adjusted models, increased fiber and isoflavone intake showed modest positive associations with LPD: fiber (per g), aOR: 1.10 (95% CI: 0.99, 1.23), P = 0.07; and isoflavones (per 10 mg), aOR: 1.38 (95% CI: 0.99, 1.92), P = 0.06. In contrast, selenium (per 10 mcg) was inversely associated with LPD, aOR: 0.80 (95% CI: 0.65, 0.97), P = 0.03. Additional adjustments for relevant lifestyle factors including vigorous exercise, perceived stress and sleep did not appreciably alter estimates.

Limitations, Reasons for Caution

The number of LPD cycles was limited, and thus these findings are exploratory. We relied on participant self-report of their medical history to apply exclusion criteria; it is possible that we admitted to the study women with a gynecologic or medical disease who were unaware of their diagnosis.

Wider Implications of the Findings

Our study suggests that diet quality may be associated with LPD among healthy eumenorrheic women. As LPD may contribute to infertility and early miscarriage, further research is warranted to elucidate how dietary factors, such as MDS, may influence LPD. The inverse association we found with selenium is supported by previous research and deserves further investigation to determine whether this finding has pathophysiologic and therapeutic implications.

Study Funding/Competing Interests

This work was supported by the Intramural Research Program, Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, National Institutes of Health. No competing interests declared.

Topics

By this author

Related research

Reproductive Endocrinology › Luteal Phase › Luteal Phase Deficiency · Menstrual Cycle › Cycle Disorders › Ovulatory Disturbances
Karen C Schliep, Joseph B Stanford, Shvetha M Zarek, Rose G Radin, Lindsey A Sjaarda, Neil J Perkins, Sunni L Mumford, Mary A Andrews, Robyn A Kalwerisky, Jean Wactawski-Wende
K Schliep, Joe Stanford, Joey Stanford, J Stanford, S Zarek, R Radin, L Sjaarda, N Perkins, S Mumford, M Andrews, R Kalwerisky, J Wactawski-Wende
PMID 26082480 26082480 DOI 10.1093/humrep/dev133 10.1093/humrep/dev133 Andrews et al. 2015, Andrews 2015