With the use of a double-blind, randomized, dose-ranging design, we tested during an 18-month period the degree of protection against postmenopausal bone loss afforded by micronized 17 beta-estradiol in dosages of 0.5, 1.0, and 2.0 mg. All subjects received supplementation to ensure a minimum of 1500 mg calcium daily. Fifty-one subjects completed at least 1 year of follow-up bone density measurements by quantitative computed tomography and by single- and dual-photon absorptiometry. In the placebo group spinal trabecular bone density decreased 4.9% annually (p less than 0.001), whereas in those taking micronized 17 beta-estradiol bone density tended to increase (annual increases of 0.3% in the 0.5 mg micronized 17 beta-estradiol group, 1.8% in the 1.0 mg micronized 17 beta-estradiol group, and 2.5% in the 2.0 mg micronized 17 beta-estradiol group). After completing the double-blind phase, 41 subjects completed an additional 18 months of follow-up while taking 1.0 mg micronized 17 beta-estradiol. During this time one third of the subjects were randomly assigned to discontinue calcium supplements. Among those who previously received placebo, trabecular bone density increased 4.3% annually, whereas among those who had used micronized 17 beta-estradiol, trabecular bone density response was inversely related to the dosage previously used. Additionally and independently, the level of calcium intake showed a statistically significant correlation with the change in spinal trabecular bone density (r = 0.37, p = 0.02). We conclude that micronized 17 beta-estradiol has a continuous skeletal dose-response effect in the range of 0.5 to 2.0 mg and that calcium intake positively modifies the skeletal response to 1.0 mg micronized 17 beta-estradiol.
micronized estradiol bone loss prevention postmenopausal, low dose 17 beta-estradiol bone density randomized trial, postmenopausal bone loss estrogen dose response, Ettinger micronized estradiol bone density study, calcium supplementation estradiol bone mineral density, quantitative computed tomography spinal trabecular bone, estrogen replacement therapy dose ranging bone protection, 0.5 mg micronized estradiol bone loss prevention, postmenopausal osteoporosis estradiol calcium interaction, double-blind randomized estrogen dose bone density
PMID 1536215 1536215 DOI 10.1016/0002-9378(92)91653-r 10.1016/0002-9378(92)91653-r Ettinger et al. 1992, Ettinger 1992
Cite this article
Ettinger, B., Genant, H. K., Steiger, P., & Madvig, P. (1992). Low-dosage micronized 17 beta-estradiol prevents bone loss in postmenopausal women. American journal of obstetrics and gynecology, 166(2), 479-488. https://doi.org/10.1016/0002-9378(92)91653-r
Ettinger B, Genant HK, Steiger P, Madvig P. Low-dosage micronized 17 beta-estradiol prevents bone loss in postmenopausal women. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1992;166(2):479-488. doi:10.1016/0002-9378(92)91653-r
Ettinger, Bruce, et al. "Low-dosage micronized 17 beta-estradiol prevents bone loss in postmenopausal women." American journal of obstetrics and gynecology, vol. 166, no. 2, 1992, pp. 479-488.
Keywords
Adult, Bone Density/drug Effects, Calcium/therapeutic Use, Double-Blind Method, Drug Synergism, Estradiol/administration & Dosage/therapeutic Use, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Humans, Middle Aged, Osteoporosis, Postmenopausal/metabolism/prevention & Control, Estradiol, Calcium, NASA Discipline Musculoskeletal, Non-NASA Center
To determine whether percutaneous estradiol (pE2) (1.5 mg/day) is able to counteract the postmenopausal bone loss in postmenopausal hysterectomized women, in a double-blind study versus oral estriol (E3) (2 mg/day). The bone mineral density of the lumbar spine (LS) and of the proximal femur (PF) was measured every 3 months by dual energy X-ray absorptiometry for 2 years in 43 hysterectomized postmenopausal women (21 in the E2 group and 22 in the E3 control group), and in a subset of patients for a 3rd year. The statistical analyses were performed on Macintosh using Stat View II. A significant bone loss of 1.2 (0.4%)% and of 1.3 (0.3)% per year was observed in the control group, respectively at LS and at PF, versus a significant gain of 1.2 (0.5)% per year in the treated group at the LS. No significant change at PF occurred in the treated group. In the 20 patients followed up for a 3rd year on pE2, an increase of 1.2 (0.9) and 2.5 (1.4)% at LS in the 12 former active group patients and the eight formerly control patients, respectively was seen. The same trend was observed at the proximal femur. pE2 (1.5 mg E2) is able to counteract the postmenopausal bone loss in hysterectomized women, whereas E3 (2 mg/day administered orally) is unable to maintain bone mass.
The purpose of this study was to contrast the effects of conventional estrogen treatment with medroxyprogesterone on cancellous and cortical bone change in the first year following premenopausal ovariectomy. This 1-year double-blind randomized therapy trial was stratified by osteoporosis family history and performed in an academic medical center and community hospitals. Premenopausal women 45 +/- 5 years old, postovariectomy for benign diseases were provided 600 mg/day of calcium and randomized to daily therapy with conjugated equine estrogen (CEE, 0.6 mg) or medroxyprogesterone (MPA, 10 mg). The primary outcome variable was spinal quantitative computed tomography (QCT) bone density change over 1 year with additional outcomes of dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) of proximal femur (FN), whole body (WB), and spine segment (WBS) and N-telopeptide, bone-specific alkaline phosphatase, and other bone marker, hormonal, and weight changes. Results in the 33 women completing the study, whose initial bone densities were normal (QCT 133 mg/cm3, femoral neck 0.94 g/cm2, whole body DXA 1.13 g/cm2), showed annual QCT loss during CEE therapy of -11.5 mg/cm3 (p < 0.0007) and MPA bone loss of -19.7 mg/cm3 (p < 0.0001). Losses were marginally greater on MPA than CEE (p = 0.04). Extremely high postovariectomy (5 days) and pretreatment resorption markers (> 3 SD above premenopausal normal levels) were significantly related to bone loss. Across the year, resorption decreased during CEE but increased on MPA treatment. Significant DXA bone losses were prevented by CEE treatment (-1.4% FN, -.4% WB, and -1.5% WBS, all NS). However, DXA bone loss was not prevented by MPA treatment (-5% FN, -2.8% WB, and -6.1% WBS, all p < 0.03). Average weight gain was significant (+ 3.2 +/- 4.0 kg) and greater on CEE than MPA (+ 4.7 vs. + 2.0 kg, p = 0.049). In conclusion, CEE therapy did not prevent significant 8% cancellous spinal bone loss in the first year following premenopausal ovariectomy, despite supplementation with 600 mg/day of calcium, good control of vasomotor symptoms, and nearly 5 kg of gain in weight. Significant DXA bone loss, however, was prevented by CEE, but not by MPA therapy. These unexpected results were statistically related to high bone resorption following ovariectomy, which CEE suppressed but MPA did not. Bone formation markers increased during MPA therapy but were unchanged during CEE therapy.
To assess the effects of oral estriol on the bone mineral density (BMD) and bone metabolism in postmenopausal women. Seventy-five natural postmenopausal women with a BMD of more than 10% below the peak bone density were treated for 50 weeks with 2 mg/day estriol (E3) cyclically and 0.8 g/day of calcium lactate continuously. BMDs at L2-L4 were measured by dual energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA). The BMD increased 1.79% (p < 0.01 vs. pretreatment) after 50 weeks, accompanied with decrease of biochemical markers of bone turnover. With regard to climacteric symptoms, Kupperman's menopausal index improved (p < 0.01 vs. pretreatment) after 5 weeks of treatment. As to the incidence of adverse events genital bleeding was observed in only 8.0% of the subjects. Endometrial histology and cytology showed neither abnormalities nor hyperplasia during and after the treatment. Estriol prevented postmenopausal bone loss and improved climacteric symptoms effectively with low incidence of genital bleeding.
We wished to appraise the effectiveness of hormone replacement therapy (HRT) in early (< 67 years) and late (> 67 years) post-menopausal women referred to a metabolic outpatient clinic for assessment of their bone status. Because older women often experience side-effects with conventional HRT, a low dose preparation (Estraderm 25) was also compared with conventional HRT (Estraderm 50). Since all patients were symptomatic, the investigation was open and not placebo controlled. Patients were offered HRT and told about the two dosages. If they wished to use HRT, allocation of dosage was made randomly unless there were reasons to use a specific dose. One hundred and ninety-six women were studied over 1 or 2 years with 80 reaching 3 years of treatment. Patients were divided into those under 67 years and those over 67 years at the start of treatment. Each group was further divided into those taking Estraderm 25 and those taking Estraderm 50 with norethisterone if appropriate. Bone mineral density (BMD) was measured (DXA, Hologic) at the lumbar spine and femoral neck at 0 year (196 patients), at 1 year (169 patients), at 2 years (139 patients) and at 3 years (80 patients). Patients losing bone were expressed as those whose 3 year BMD was lower than initial or as those whose BMD at 3 years had fallen by more than twice the coefficient of variation for that site (non-responders). In lumbar spine, BMD increased maximally in the first year in all groups and the gain was maintained after 3 years. The change was similar whether patients were divided by age or dosage. For those on Estraderm 25, mean change after 3 years was 8.1 +/- 6.8% and on Estraderm 50, 9.0 +/- 8.3% (combined 8.7 +/- 7.8%). Only 3.9% of patients were non-responders at the lumbar spine after 3 years. At femoral neck, changes were significant at 3 years only in the Estraderm 25 > 67 years and Estraderm 50 < 67 years groups and averaged 2.3 +/- 5.4% for all patients. At the femoral neck, 10.4% of patients were non-responders after 3 years. Percentage change of BMD over 3 years at lumbar spine correlated with that at the femoral neck (r = 0.56). Percentage change of BMD at lumbar spine over 3 years correlated with menopausal age (r = 0.295). No relation was found between dosage of Estraderm/kg body weight and response of BMD at either site. Transdermal oestrogen is effective at preventing bone loss in the spine at all post-menopausal ages and is capable of doing this in low dosage. Prevention of bone loss at the femoral neck is less certain and the average change in BMD over 3 years was significantly lower (P < 0.001) than in the lumbar spine. Use of Estraderm 50 is not associated with a greater response of bone mass and there was no evidence of an increasing BMD response as oestradiol dosage/kg body weight increased.