Reproductive Endocrinology · Ovarian Hormones

The absorption of oral micronized progesterone: the effect of food, dose proportionality, and comparison with intramuscular progesterone

Simon JA, Robinson DE, Andrews MC, Hildebrand JR 3rd, Rocci ML Jr, Blake RE, Hodgen GD

Published July 1993 Fertility and Sterility, 60(1), 26-33
DOI 10.1016/s0015-0282(16)56031-2 PMID 8513955
Read our synopsis

RRM Academy Synopsis

Food doubled oral progesterone absorption in postmenopausal women

Eating a meal doubled how much oral micronized progesterone the body absorbed in 15 postmenopausal women. In this randomized crossover trial, the pills gave 8.6% of the exposure from a shot into muscle, adjusted for dose. Taken fasting, blood levels rose in proportion across three pill amounts.

Key Findings

  • Taking the capsule after breakfast raised total absorption (area under the serum curve, day 1) by a factor of 2.0 compared with fasting (P < 0.05). Time to peak was similar.
  • Across three oral amounts taken fasting, total absorption rose in proportion to the amount. Absorption and elimination were dose-independent across those amounts.
  • Relative bioavailability of oral micronized progesterone was 8.6% of intramuscular progesterone on day 1, and 6.2% on days 2 through 4.
  • Dose-adjusted peak level after oral progesterone was 30.0% of the level after injection. The peak came significantly earlier with the oral form.
  • Total exposure nearly doubled from day 1 to day 2 with the injection, showing accumulation. The oral form showed no such rise.

Interpretation

The trial was a small, open label crossover: each of 15 healthy postmenopausal women received every arm in random order, 7 days apart (21 women started). The study measured blood progesterone levels only. It reports no pregnancy, symptom or uterine lining outcomes. The women were postmenopausal, and the paper did not study women who ovulate. Dosing lasted 2 to 5 days. The authors could not separate why food raised absorption. The capsule's manufacturer supported the work in part.

RRM Context

The paper says synthetic progestogens act differently from native progesterone. Restorative reproductive medicine keeps the words apart. Progestins are synthetic. Progesterone is the body's own hormone, made after ovulation. These women were postmenopausal. The trial covers absorption of a supply taken by mouth or shot, and says nothing about restoring ovulation.

Abstract

Objectives

To examine the effects of food ingestion and administered dose on the absorption of oral micronized P (Utrogestan; Besins-Iscovesco, Paris, France) and to compare the bioavailability of intramuscular versus oral routes of administration.

Design

Prospective, randomized, open label crossover protocol with 7 days between dosages.

Setting

Academic institution.

Participants

Fifteen normal postmenopausal women.

Interventions

All subjects participated in three separate protocols: [1] micronized P (200 mg) or placebo under fasting or nonfasting conditions once daily for 5 days; [2] micronized P (100, 200, or 300 mg) once daily under fasting conditions for 5 days; and [3] micronized P (200 mg) or intramuscular P (50 mg in oil) administered once daily for 2 days.

Main Outcome Measures

Serum P concentrations were measured in all groups.

Results

Concomitant food ingestion increased the area under the serum P concentration versus time curve (AUC0 to 24) and the maximum serum P concentration (Cmax) without affecting time to maximum serum concentration (Tmax) (P < 0.05). Micronized P absorption and elimination were first-order processes and exhibited dose-independent pharmacokinetics between 100 and 300 mg. After intramuscular P, Cmax was higher and Tmax occurred later compared with the oral P preparation. Oral P had lower relative bioavailability (8.6%) than intramuscular P.

Conclusions

Absorption of micronized P was enhanced twofold in the presence of food. Both absorption and elimination were dose-independent, dose proportionality being confirmed. Bioavailability of the oral P was approximately 10% compared with intramuscular P.

Topics

By this author

Related research

Reproductive Endocrinology › Ovarian Hormones › Progesterone · Therapeutics › Hormonal Agents › Progesterone and Progestins · Perimenopause and Menopause › Hormone Therapy › Bioidentical Hormones
PMID 8513955 8513955 DOI 10.1016/s0015-0282(16)56031-2 10.1016/s0015-0282(16)56031-2 Simon et al. 1993, Simon 1993

Cite this article

Simon, J. A., Robinson, D. E., Andrews, M. C., Hildebrand JR 3rd, Rocci ML Jr, Blake, R. E., & Hodgen, G. D. (1993). The absorption of oral micronized progesterone: the effect of food, dose proportionality, and comparison with intramuscular progesterone. Fertility and sterility, 60(1), 26-33. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0015-0282(16)56031-2