Vegetarian vs nonvegetarian diets, dietary restraint, and subclinical ovulatory  disturbances: prospective 6-mo study

Susan I Barr; K C Janelle; Jerilynn C Prior

doi:10.1093/ajcn/60.6.887

Menstrual Cycle · Cycle Disorders

Vegetarian vs nonvegetarian diets, dietary restraint, and subclinical ovulatory disturbances: prospective 6-mo study

Barr SI, Janelle KC, Prior JC

Published December 1994 The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, 60(6), 887-894

DOI 10.1093/ajcn/60.6.887 PMID 7985629

Abstract

Ovulatory function was prospectively assessed over 6 mo in 23 vegetarians and 22 nonvegetarians with clinically normal menstrual cycles. Subjects were 20-40 y of age, of stable weight (body mass index, in kg/m2, of 18-25), on current diets for > or = 2 y, and not using oral contraceptives. Quantitative analysis of basal body temperature records classified cycles as normally ovulatory, short luteal phase (< 10 d), or anovulatory. Subjects completed the Three-Factor Eating Questionnaire (subjects completed the Three-Factor Eating Questionnaire (subscales for restraint, hunger, and disinhibition) and kept three 3-d food records. Vegetarians had lower BMIs (21.1 +/- 2.3 vs 22.7 +/- 1.9, P < 0.05), percentage body fat (24.0 +/- 5.5% vs 27.4 +/- 5.1%, P < 0.05), and restraint scores (6.4 +/- 4.4 vs 9.5 +/- 3.7, P < 0.05). Mean cycle lengths were similar, but vegetarians had longer luteal phase lengths (11.2 +/- 2.6 vs 9.1 +/- 3.8 d, P < 0.05). Cycle types also differed (chi 2 = 9.64, P < 0.01): vegetarians had fewer anovulatory cycles (4.6% vs 15.1% of cycles). Compared with those with restraint scores below the median, highly restrained women had fewer ovulatory cycles (3.6 +/- 2.3 vs 5.0 +/- 1.4, P < 0.05) and shorter mean luteal phase lengths (7.4 +/- 4.1 vs 10.7 +/- 3.1 d, P < 0.05). We conclude that ovulatory disturbances and restrained eating are less common among vegetarians, and that restraint influences ovulatory function.

Topics

By this author

Luteal Phase · Luteal Phase Deficiency

The influence of the menstrual cycle on muscle injuries - a systematic review and meta-analysis

Guthardt Y et al., 2026 Sci Rep Free full text on PubMed Central

This systematic review and meta-analysis examined the relationship between menstrual cycle phases and the incidence of muscle injuries in female team sport athletes, following PRISMA 2020 and PERSiST guidelines. A comprehensive search was conducted in PubMed, Scopus, and SPORTDiscus from inception to mid-January 2024. Studies were included if they examined female team sport athletes of reproductive age with regular menstrual cycles and compared the occurrence of muscle injuries across at least two menstrual phases. Studies involving hormonal contraceptive use, medications affecting the menstrual cycle or musculoskeletal system, or menstrual dysfunction were excluded. Three studies met the inclusion criteria, involving 318 participants. Meta-analysis yielded a pooled Risk Ratio of 1.18 (95% CI: 0.75 to 1.86, p = 0.46) for injury risk between the luteal and follicular phases, suggesting no statistically significant association. However, the certainty of the cumulative evidence was rated as very low due to methodological limitations, including inconsistent phase classifications and reliance on imprecise methods for identifying menstrual phases. Consequently, no practical or clinical recommendations can be made at this time. Future research employing standardised, physiologically accurate methods for classifying and detecting menstrual cycle phases is necessary to better understand the potential links between hormonal fluctuations and injury risk.

Breast Health · Benign Breast Conditions

MON-154 Breast areolar diameter in healthy menstruating women—a single cycle cross-sectional study of associations with body size and ovulatory characteristics

Baaske AV et al., 2025 Journal of the Endocrine Society Free full text on PubMed Central

Tanner Breast Stage 3 (TB3, at menarche) and Tanner 5 (TB5, once ovulatory cycles established), despite being similar with an “upstanding” nipple, are different. Evidence suggests that steady and high ovulatory-level progesterone exposure accounts for the larger areolar diameter in TB5. Progesterone levels indicate whether the menstrual cycle is ovulatory and have crucial implications for women’s reproductive, metabolic, cardiovascular, and bone health. However, few data show average areolar diameter in regularly cycling women in whom SES, body size, and reproductive variables have been documented. As a step towards better understanding the role of areolar diameter in reflecting estradiol-progesterone balance, this study aims to document the average mean bilateral lateral areolar diameter (AD) in a cohort of regularly menstruating, premenopausal women in whom ovulation was documented in one cycle. We also aim to describe relationships between AD and demographic, anthropometric, and reproductive/ovulation variables. Women were eligible if aged 19-35 years with about month-apart cycles and no exogenous hormone use in the last 3-months. Participants completed one cycle with a daily Menstrual Cycle Diary© (cycle length, CL) and first morning temperatures for Quantitative Basal Temperature© (QBT©) ovulation analysis (normal luteal phase length ≥10 days). Questionnaires gathered SES, ethnic, general health, and reproductive characteristics. Bilateral horizontal areolar diameters were measured by a woman researcher with the participant supine in a warm room. From February 2020 to September 2022 (during the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic), 73 women from Metro Vancouver, British Columbia participated. Women were of median (min-max) age 30 (19-35) years, BMI 24.5 (17.1-41.4) and most identified as White (61.6%) with a median of 16 years of education. Median CL was 29 days (n=65) and QBT data showed 39.3% were normally ovulatory, 34.4% had short luteal phases and 26.2% were anovulatory. Median within-woman bilateral AD was 3.85 (2.35-8.00) cm. Left AD exceeded right (L 3.8 [2.3,8.2]; R 3.7 [ 2.4,7.8]; P=.003). Larger AD (≥3.85cm) was associated with greater body size (BMI r=.534), weight and waist circumference. However, earlier age at menarche (P=.02) was also significantly associated. No other reproductive variables (cycle length, luteal phase length, parity, ever use of CHC) were related to AD before body size adjustments. This study is the first to document, and describe demographic, anthropomorphic and reproductive associations with, AD in community dwelling, regularly cycling, premenopausal women. Future steps will determine the most influential of the anthropometric variables; adjustment for these will facilitate assessments of associations with ovulation related characteristics.

Breast Health · Benign Breast Conditions

SAT-128 Prospective 1-year Menstrual CycleBreast Tenderness and Swelling Experiences—data from healthy regularly cycling women initially proven normally ovulatory on two consecutive cycles

Wood M et al., 2025 Journal of the Endocrine Society Free full text on PubMed Central

Breast tenderness and swelling are associated with premenstrual symptoms but have not been well described in healthy, normally cycling women with known ovulatory status. There are documented negative health risks (in bone, the cardiovascular system and cancers) in association with ovulatory disturbances within normal-length cycles. Identifying breast changes across a predictable, month-apart cycle but with Subclinical Ovulatory Disturbances (SOD, short luteal phase [<10 days] and anovulation (with normal estradiol but lower or absent progesterone levels) could advance our understanding of menstrual cycle physiology, women’s health education and identification of those with chronic SOD who may benefit from cyclic progesterone therapy. Our objective was to determine whether within-woman breast tenderness and swelling experiences differed between normally ovulatory and ovulatory-disturbed cycles. In this 1-year prospective observational study, we examined daily breast tenderness (0-4) and swelling (1-5 change from usual = 3) experiences recorded via the Menstrual Cycle Diary© over ≥8 cycles (mean=13/woman) in 53 women. Ovulatory status was documented by the twice-validated Quantitative Basal Temperature© (QBT©) analysis. Cycle and ovulatory data were previously reported (Prior NEJM, 1990); Diary data were unreported. Participants were healthy, community-dwelling women, mean age 34 (32.4:35.5 years), BMI 22.0, primarily White, and about two-thirds were runners (for health or were marathon-training). Comparison of breast parameters in all normally ovulatory (n = 495) vs all SOD cycles (n = 199) (mean cycle length 28.1 [27.5-28.8 days]), showed significantly higher Breast Tenderness Score [intensity X days; 6.0 (range 1.0, 14.0) vs. 3.0 (0.0, 11.0) (P = .001)] and increased breast size [4.0 (2.0, 4.0) vs. 4.0 (0.0, 4.0) (P = .034]) in normally ovulatory cycles. However, in within-woman analysis (n = 47 women with both normally ovulatory and SOD cycles), breast tenderness/swelling did not significantly differ by ovulatory status. We plotted all ovulatory cycles (n=676) centred on ovulation; this revealed parallel timing of increases in breast tenderness and swelling in the late luteal phase. These 1-year prospective data documented that mild breast tenderness and swelling occurred before flow in cycles with normal ovulation; symptoms were less in SOD cycles. Breast changes were totally absent during the follicular phases.

Hormonal Agents · Progesterone and Progestins

"SUN-109 Feasibility of Cyclic Progesterone and Spironolactone for PCOS-specific Health-Related Quality of Life—a six-month, Phase II, single arm, single center, open-label study"

Nelson K et al., 2025 J Endocr Soc Free full text on PubMed Central

Polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) is an endocrine-metabolic disorder that significantly decreases health-related quality of life (HRQoL). Combined hormonal contraceptives (CHC) are standard-of-care for PCOS but do not mitigate the neuroendocrine cause nor women’s primary concerns. Treatment options need expansion. We hypothesized cyclic oral micronized progesterone (CyclicP4) and spironolactone (Sp) would improve HRQoL, decrease LH, and acne. This Phase II, open-label single-arm pilot study evaluated the 6-month cyclicP4 and Sp treatment feasibility and safety in androgenic PCOS. Our primary outcome was within-woman change in PCOS-HRQoL (PCOSQ). No sample size calculation was possible; 40 was considered feasible. Eligible women were 19-40 years with physician-diagnosed androgenic PCOS. Exclusion criteria included HbA1c > 6.4%, use of metformin or CHC in the last month. Participants received progesterone (300 mg/bedtime 14 days/month); spironolactone (200 mg/day) began in cycle two. Adherence was tracked daily (Menstrual Cycle Diary©) and by pill counts. Safety was assessed by post-study potassium (K+). Feasibility by women’s post-trial treatment intention. PCOSQ, serum LH, calculated bioavailable testosterone (cBAT), HbA1c, hsCRP, and AMH were measured at baseline and trial end. We also assessed perceived acne and sleep changes (-5 to +5), K+ and therapy intent at study end. Six-month change by paired t-test or Wilcoxon signed-rank assessed P < .05 as important. Of 109 expressing interest, 41 enrolled, 36 began therapy (5 did not), and 26 provided final questionnaire data (19 with complete lab data). Completing women were mean age 29 (SD 4.9) years, BMI 30.3 (8.1), 61.5% White and 73.1% with university degrees. Total PCOSQ scores within-woman increased from 3.5±1.0 to 4.9±1.1 (95% CI 3.1-3.8, 4.6-5.3; P<.0000001). Each PCOSQ domain significantly improved (at least P<.001) as did acne and sleep. Weight was unchanged but waist circumference decreased 1.1 cm (NS). LH, cBAT, and AMH each decreased: LH 10.0±5.4 to 8.5±5.2 IU/L (95% CI 7.6-12.3, 6.3-10.8; P<.4), cBAT 0.7±0.4 to 0.6±0.3 nmol/L (0.5-0.9, 0.5-0.8; P<.2), and AMH 10.5±6.5 to 9.7±5.7 ng/ml (7.4-13.7, 7.0-12.4; P<.4). hsCRP remained unchanged (2.8±3.3 to 2.7±3.6 mg/L; P<.8) as did HbA1c (5.2±0.3 to 5.2±0.3%; P<.0). K+ remained within the normal range (3.5-5.0 mmol/L) at final testing (mean 4.0). Two allergic responses to spironolactone and one frequent flow/religious practice led to discontinuation. Feasibility was confirmed and participants strongly preferred continuing therapy (median Likert score=6/7, P<.0001) CyclicP4 and Sp for 6-months was feasible and significantly improved HRQoL in a non-medicine-seeking community women cohort with androgenic PCOS. Though the small sample size limited generalizability, findings are promising. A larger randomized trial comparing CyclicP4 vs. CHC is warranted.

Related research

Cycle Physiology · Luteal Phase

Energy intakes are higher during the luteal phase of ovulatory menstrual cycles

Barr SI et al., 1995 Am J Clin Nutr

We compared energy and macronutrient intakes across the menstrual cycle in participants (n = 42) in a study that assessed the frequency of ovulatory disturbances in regularly cycling vegetarians and nonvegetarians. Women kept daily basal body temperature records for six consecutive menstrual cycles and provided 3-d diet records near the beginning, middle, and end of different cycles. On completion of the study, temperature records were quantitatively analyzed to determine whether cycles were ovulatory, and if so, the date the luteal phase began. Diet records kept near the beginning and end of cycles were matched with temperature analysis results, and women were grouped according to whether the end-of-cycle record was kept during the luteal phase of an ovulatory cycle (group 1, n = 29), or during an anovulatory cycle or before luteal phase onset of a short luteal phase cycle (group 2, n = 13). Group 1 had higher energy intakes during the luteal than during the follicular phase (9.27 +/- 2.69 vs 8.01 +/- 2.36 MJ/d, P < 0.0001), whereas intakes of group 2 did not differ across the cycle (7.91 +/- 2.18 vs 8.20 +/- 1.48 MJ/d, NS). Both groups' macronutrient intakes were similar in records kept near the beginning and end of cycles. Documentation of ovulation is necessary in studies assessing premenopausal women's energy intakes.

Nutrition and Metabolic Health · Eating Disorders and Underfueling

Restrained eating and ovulatory disturbances: possible implications for bone health

Barr SI et al., 1994 Am J Clin Nutr

We assessed the relationship between dietary restraint and menstrual cycle characteristics in 27 ovulatory women, previous participants in a longitudinal study of spinal cancellous bone mineral density (BMD). Subjects completed the restraint scale of the Three Factor Eating Questionnaire, recorded basal temperature and exercise for at least three menstrual cycles, and completed a 3-d food record. Cycle lengths of women in the upper and lower tertiles of scores for restraint were similar [27.8 +/- 1.0 (mean +/- SE) vs 27.6 +/- 0.8 d], but luteal phase length was shorter in the former group (8.6 +/- 0.9 vs 10.8 +/- 0.5 d, P < 0.05). Age, body mass index, percent body fat, waist-hip ratio, reported energy intake, and activity were similar between groups. Because the previous longitudinal study found associations between ovulatory disturbances and bone loss, we assessed spinal BMD using dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry (DXA) and quantitative computed tomography (QCT). BMD of women in upper and lower restraint tertiles, respectively, did not differ: DXA, 1.15 +/- 0.05 vs 1.20 +/- 0.06 g/cm2; and QCT, 140 +/- 7 vs 133 +/- 7 mg/cm3. Additional prospective studies, however, appear warranted. In conclusion, this study's results provide evidence that high dietary restraint is associated with a shortened luteal phase length.

Nutrition and Metabolic Health · Eating Disorders and Underfueling

"Relationships among cognitive dietary restraint, subclinical ovulation disturbances, cortisol and 2‐yr change in bone density in premenopausal women"

Bedford JL et al., 2010 The FASEB Journal

Cognitive dietary restraint (CDR) is the perception of limiting food intake to achieve/maintain a perceived ideal body weight. The objective of this 2‐yr prospective study was to determine if women with higher CDR have more subclinical ovulation disturbances (SOD; anovulation or luteal phase <10 d), elevated cortisol excretion and less positive changes in areal bone mineral density over two years (ΔaBMD). Participants were 123 healthy, non‐obese, regularly menstruating women aged 19–35. Annually participants completed questionnaires (Three Factor Eating Questionnaire, physical activity, general stress, dietary intake), anthropometrics and 24‐hr urine collections for measurement of 24‐hr urinary free cortisol (UFC). At baseline and final follow‐up, dual energy x‐ray absorptiometry scans measured ΔaBMD at the lumbar spine (L1‐4), hip and total body. Quantitative waking temperature was used to determine SOD frequency. SOD correlated positively with CDR and inversely with hip ΔaBMD but not with UFC. CDR and UFC were not associated with each other or ΔaBMD. Women with higher CDR had more SOD. Women with more SOD had less positive ΔaBMD and higher CDR. Physical activity, general stress, body mass and energy intake did not explain differences by CDR or SOD. In conclusion, CDR was the only study variable associated with SOD which was associated with less positive ΔaBMD. Canadian Institutes of Health Research 79563. Grant Funding Source : Canadian Institute of Health Research

Nutrition and Metabolic Health · Eating Disorders and Underfueling

A prospective exploration of cognitive dietary restraint, subclinical ovulatory disturbances, cortisol, and change in bone density over two years in healthy young women

Bedford JL et al., 2010 J Clin Endocrinol Metab

Cross-sectional studies have found associations among elevated cognitive dietary restraint (CDR), increased ovulatory disturbances, and lower bone mass, possibly mediated by cortisol. To determine whether healthy young women with higher CDR have more menstrual cycles with subclinical ovulatory disturbances (SOD), elevated 24-h urinary free cortisol (UFC), and less positive 2-yr areal bone mineral density change (Delta-aBMD). DESIGN, SETTING, We conducted a 2-yr longitudinal study of 123 healthy, community-dwelling, nonobese, regularly menstruating women aged 19-35 yr. Key variables were Three Factor Eating Questionnaire Restraint score, percent of cycles with anvoluation and/or luteal phase length <10 d (%SOD), UFC, and Delta-aBMD at the lumbar spine (L1-L4), total hip, and whole body. Anthropometrics, general stress, physical activity, and energy intake were measured. Adjusting for potential confounders, differences were examined by general linear modeling using median split of CDR score and %SOD. Women with higher CDR had higher %SOD (56 vs. 34%, P < 0.001) and higher UFC (28.0 vs. 24.0 microg/d, P = 0.021). Delta-aBMD did not differ by CDR. Women with higher %SOD had less positive Delta-aBMD at L1-L4 (0.7 vs. 1.9%, P = 0.034) and hip (-0.6 vs. 0.9%, P = 0.001), and higher CDR score (8.7 vs. 7.1, P = 0.04). Physical activity, general stress, body mass index, and energy intake did not explain differences by CDR or %SOD. UFC was not associated with %SOD or Delta-aBMD. Women with more frequent SOD reported higher CDR and experienced less positive Delta-aBMD. Although women with higher CDR had higher UFC, the mechanism linking CDR, SOD, and aBMD is not clear.

Menstrual Cycle › Cycle Disorders › Ovulatory Disturbances · Reproductive Endocrinology › Ovulation Physiology › Anovulation · Lifestyle and Environment › Nutrition and Metabolic Health › Dietary Patterns

Jerilynn C Prior, Susan I Barr

J Prior, Sue Barr, S Barr

PMID 7985629 7985629 DOI 10.1093/ajcn/60.6.887 10.1093/ajcn/60.6.887 Barr et al. 1994, Barr 1994

Cite this article

Barr, S. I., Janelle, K. C., & Prior, J. C. (1994). Vegetarian vs nonvegetarian diets, dietary restraint, and subclinical ovulatory disturbances: prospective 6-mo study. The American journal of clinical nutrition, 60(6), 887-894. https://doi.org/10.1093/ajcn/60.6.887