We assessed the relationship between dietary restraint and menstrual cycle characteristics in 27 ovulatory women, previous participants in a longitudinal study of spinal cancellous bone mineral density (BMD). Subjects completed the restraint scale of the Three Factor Eating Questionnaire, recorded basal temperature and exercise for at least three menstrual cycles, and completed a 3-d food record. Cycle lengths of women in the upper and lower tertiles of scores for restraint were similar [27.8 +/- 1.0 (mean +/- SE) vs 27.6 +/- 0.8 d], but luteal phase length was shorter in the former group (8.6 +/- 0.9 vs 10.8 +/- 0.5 d, P < 0.05). Age, body mass index, percent body fat, waist-hip ratio, reported energy intake, and activity were similar between groups. Because the previous longitudinal study found associations between ovulatory disturbances and bone loss, we assessed spinal BMD using dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry (DXA) and quantitative computed tomography (QCT). BMD of women in upper and lower restraint tertiles, respectively, did not differ: DXA, 1.15 +/- 0.05 vs 1.20 +/- 0.06 g/cm2; and QCT, 140 +/- 7 vs 133 +/- 7 mg/cm3. Additional prospective studies, however, appear warranted. In conclusion, this study's results provide evidence that high dietary restraint is associated with a shortened luteal phase length.
restrained eating ovulatory disturbances bone health, Prior JC ovulatory disturbances bone mineral density, dietary restraint shortened luteal phase length, Barr Prior restrained eating menstrual cycle, luteal phase deficiency eating behavior bone loss, subclinical ovulatory disturbances spinal bone density, Three Factor Eating Questionnaire menstrual function, basal body temperature luteal phase dietary restraint, ovulatory women bone mineral density DXA QCT, restrained eating shortened luteal phase implications
PMID 8279410 8279410 DOI 10.1093/ajcn/59.1.92 10.1093/ajcn/59.1.92
Cite this article
Barr, S. I., Prior, J. C., & Vigna, Y. M. (1994). Restrained eating and ovulatory disturbances: possible implications for bone health. The American journal of clinical nutrition, 59(1), 92-97. https://doi.org/10.1093/ajcn/59.1.92
Barr SI, Prior JC, Vigna YM. Restrained eating and ovulatory disturbances: possible implications for bone health. Am J Clin Nutr. 1994;59(1):92-97. doi:10.1093/ajcn/59.1.92
Barr, S. I., et al. "Restrained eating and ovulatory disturbances: possible implications for bone health." The American journal of clinical nutrition, vol. 59, no. 1, 1994, pp. 92-97.
Swain MC et al., 1974·J Obstet Gynaecol Br Commonw
The luteal phase plasma progesterone levels of 341 control patients were compared with those in 25 patients with early and 12 patients with advanced breast cancer. There was a significant increase of ovulatory failure and luteal deficiency in patients with advanced breast cancer.
Caffeine is the most frequently used psychoactive substance in the United States and >90% of reproductive-age women report some amount of intake daily. Despite biological plausibility, previous studies on caffeine and fecundability report conflicting results. Importantly, prior studies measured caffeine exposure exclusively by self-report, which is subject to measurement error and does not account for factors that influence caffeine metabolism. Our objective was to examine associations between preconception serum caffeine metabolites, caffeinated beverage intake, and fecundability. Participants included 1228 women aged 18-40 y with a history of 1-2 pregnancy losses in the EAGeR (Effects of Aspirin in Gestation and Reproduction) trial. We prospectively evaluated associations of preconception caffeine metabolites (i.e., caffeine, paraxanthine, and theobromine) measured from 1191 serum samples untimed to a specific time of day, self-reported usual caffeinated beverage intakes at baseline, and time-varying cycle-average caffeinated beverage intake, with fecundability. Using Cox proportional hazards models, we estimated fecundability odds ratios (FORs) and 95% CIs according to each metabolite. Follow-up was complete for 89% (n = 1088) of participants. At baseline, 85%, 73%, and 91% of women had detectable serum caffeine, paraxanthine, and theobromine, respectively. A total of 797 women became pregnant during ≤6 cycles of preconception follow-up. After adjusting for potential confounders, neither serum caffeine [tertile (T)3 compared with T1 0.87; 95% CI: 0.71, 1.08], paraxanthine (T3 compared with T1 0.92; 95% CI: 0.75, 1.14), nor theobromine (T3 compared with T1 1.15; 95% CI: 0.95, 1.40) were associated with fecundability. Baseline intake of total caffeinated beverages was not associated with fecundability (>3 compared with 0 0.99; 95% CI: 0.74, 1.34), nor was caffeinated coffee (>2 compared with 0 0.93; 95% CI: 0.45, 1.92) or caffeinated soda (>2 0.92; 95% CI: 0.71, 1.20). Our findings are reassuring that caffeine exposure from usual low to moderate caffeinated beverage intake likely does not influence fecundability.This trial was registered at clinicaltrials.gov as NCT00467363.
Purdue-Smithe AC et al., 2016·The American journal of clinical nutrition
Clinically significant premenstrual syndrome (PMS) affects 15-20% of premenopausal women, substantially reducing quality of life. Women with PMS often are counseled to minimize caffeine intake, although only limited evidence supports this recommendation. We evaluated the association between total caffeine, coffee, and tea intake and the development of PMS in a case-control study nested within the prospective Nurses' Health Study II. All participants were free from PMS at baseline (1991). PMS cases reported a new clinician-made diagnosis of PMS on biennial questionnaires between 1993 and 2005, and then confirmed symptom timing and moderate-to-severe impact and severity of symptoms with the use of a retrospective questionnaire (n = 1234). Controls did not report PMS and confirmed experiencing no symptoms or few mild symptoms with limited personal impact (n = 2426). Caffeine, coffee, and tea intake was measured by food-frequency questionnaires every 4 y, and data on smoking, body weight, and other factors were updated every 2-4 y. Logistic regression was used to evaluate the associations of total caffeine intake and frequency of coffee and tea consumption with PMS. After adjustment for age, smoking, and other factors, total caffeine intake was not associated with PMS. The OR comparing women with the highest (quintile median = 543 mg/d) to the lowest (quintile median = 18 mg/d) caffeine intake was 0.79 (95% CI: 0.61, 1.04; P-trend = 0.31). High caffeinated coffee intake also was not associated with risk of PMS or specific symptoms, including breast tenderness (OR for ≥4 cups/d compared with <1/mo: 0.73; 95% CI: 0.48, 1.12; P-trend = 0.44). Our findings suggest that caffeine intake is not associated with PMS, and that current recommendations for women to reduce caffeine intake may not help prevent the development of PMS.