We assessed the relationship between dietary restraint and menstrual cycle characteristics in 27 ovulatory women, previous participants in a longitudinal study of spinal cancellous bone mineral density (BMD). Subjects completed the restraint scale of the Three Factor Eating Questionnaire, recorded basal temperature and exercise for at least three menstrual cycles, and completed a 3-d food record. Cycle lengths of women in the upper and lower tertiles of scores for restraint were similar [27.8 +/- 1.0 (mean +/- SE) vs 27.6 +/- 0.8 d], but luteal phase length was shorter in the former group (8.6 +/- 0.9 vs 10.8 +/- 0.5 d, P < 0.05). Age, body mass index, percent body fat, waist-hip ratio, reported energy intake, and activity were similar between groups. Because the previous longitudinal study found associations between ovulatory disturbances and bone loss, we assessed spinal BMD using dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry (DXA) and quantitative computed tomography (QCT). BMD of women in upper and lower restraint tertiles, respectively, did not differ: DXA, 1.15 +/- 0.05 vs 1.20 +/- 0.06 g/cm2; and QCT, 140 +/- 7 vs 133 +/- 7 mg/cm3. Additional prospective studies, however, appear warranted. In conclusion, this study's results provide evidence that high dietary restraint is associated with a shortened luteal phase length.
restrained eating ovulatory disturbances bone health, Prior JC ovulatory disturbances bone mineral density, dietary restraint shortened luteal phase length, Barr Prior restrained eating menstrual cycle, luteal phase deficiency eating behavior bone loss, subclinical ovulatory disturbances spinal bone density, Three Factor Eating Questionnaire menstrual function, basal body temperature luteal phase dietary restraint, ovulatory women bone mineral density DXA QCT, restrained eating shortened luteal phase implications
PMID 8279410 8279410 DOI 10.1093/ajcn/59.1.92 10.1093/ajcn/59.1.92 Barr et al. 1994, Barr 1994
Cite this article
Barr, S. I., Prior, J. C., & Vigna, Y. M. (1994). Restrained eating and ovulatory disturbances: possible implications for bone health. The American journal of clinical nutrition, 59(1), 92-97. https://doi.org/10.1093/ajcn/59.1.92
Barr SI, Prior JC, Vigna YM. Restrained eating and ovulatory disturbances: possible implications for bone health. Am J Clin Nutr. 1994;59(1):92-97. doi:10.1093/ajcn/59.1.92
Barr, S. I., et al. "Restrained eating and ovulatory disturbances: possible implications for bone health." The American journal of clinical nutrition, vol. 59, no. 1, 1994, pp. 92-97.
We compared energy and macronutrient intakes across the menstrual cycle in participants (n = 42) in a study that assessed the frequency of ovulatory disturbances in regularly cycling vegetarians and nonvegetarians. Women kept daily basal body temperature records for six consecutive menstrual cycles and provided 3-d diet records near the beginning, middle, and end of different cycles. On completion of the study, temperature records were quantitatively analyzed to determine whether cycles were ovulatory, and if so, the date the luteal phase began. Diet records kept near the beginning and end of cycles were matched with temperature analysis results, and women were grouped according to whether the end-of-cycle record was kept during the luteal phase of an ovulatory cycle (group 1, n = 29), or during an anovulatory cycle or before luteal phase onset of a short luteal phase cycle (group 2, n = 13). Group 1 had higher energy intakes during the luteal than during the follicular phase (9.27 +/- 2.69 vs 8.01 +/- 2.36 MJ/d, P < 0.0001), whereas intakes of group 2 did not differ across the cycle (7.91 +/- 2.18 vs 8.20 +/- 1.48 MJ/d, NS). Both groups' macronutrient intakes were similar in records kept near the beginning and end of cycles. Documentation of ovulation is necessary in studies assessing premenopausal women's energy intakes.
Duane M et al., 2022·BMC Pregnancy Childbirth·
Open Access
Miscarriage is defined as spontaneous loss of pregnancy prior to 20 weeks gestation. With an estimated risk of 15% of clinically confirmed pregnancies ending in miscarriage, it is the most common adverse event in pregnancy. Woman's age is the primary risk factor for miscarriage, while medical conditions, including hormonal abnormalities, are also associated. Progesterone is essential for maintaining pregnancy. A short luteal phase may reflect inadequate levels of progesterone production, but it is unclear whether a short luteal phase correlates with an increase in the risk of miscarriage. Using a cohort study design, we conducted a secondary data analysis from four cohorts of couples who used a standardized protocol to track biomarkers of the female cycles. A short luteal phase was defined as less than 10 days, with < 11, < 9, and < 8 days as alternate definitions in sensitivity analyses. We included women who experienced a pregnancy with a known outcome, identified the length of the luteal phase in up to 3 cycles prior to conception and assessed the relationship with miscarriage using a modified Poisson regression analysis, adjusting for demographic characteristics, smoking, alcohol use and previous pregnancy history. In our sample of 252 women; the overall miscarriage rate was 18.7%. The adjusted incident risk ratio of miscarriage in women who had at least one short luteal phase < 10 days, compared to those who had none, was 1.01 (95% CI: 0.57, 1.80) Similar null risk was found when assessing alternative lengths of short luteal phase. Women who had short luteal phases < 10 days in all 3 cycles prior to the conception cycle had an incident risk ratio of 2.14 (95% CI: 0.7, 6.55). Our study found that a short luteal phase in the three cycles prior to conception was not associated with higher rates of miscarriage in an international cohort of women tracking their cycles, but our sample size was limited. Further research to determine if short luteal phases or luteal phase deficiency is associated with early pregnancy losses among preconception cohorts with daily tracking of cycle parameters, in addition to progesterone and human chorionic gonadotropin levels, is warranted. Additionally, future studies should include women with recurrent short luteal phases as a more likely risk factor than isolated short luteal phases.
To evaluate the luteal phase in women with rigorously defined unexplained infertility. Prospective study. National Center for Infertility Research at Michigan. PATIENT(S): Evaluation of 1,885 women with infertility identified 12 women who met the rigorously defined criteria for unexplained infertility: [1] infertility of > or = 24 months duration, with no male factor, anatomic-functional disorders of the reproductive tract, or immunologic infertility; [2] normal body mass index (BMI); [3] ovulatory cycles ranging from 26 to 32 days; [4] normal luteal phase determined by endometrial biopsy; and [5] normal baseline hormonal profile. Controls (n = 12) were healthy, parous women with normal ovulatory cycles, normal hormonal screen, and were matched for age and BMI to patients. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Pattern of follicular growth rate and luteal phase hormonal profile. RESULT(S): Women with unexplained infertility did not differ in menstrual cycle characteristics, follicular growth rate or mean preovulatory follicle diameter, or endometrial biopsy dating. The mean levels of P tended to be lower in the unexplained infertility group throughout the luteal phase, but only the midluteal interval reached statistical significance. Luteal phase mean integrated P or urinary PDG levels of unexplained infertility women did not differ from those of fertile controls. The ratio of integrated E2:P also was significantly greater in women with unexplained infertility than in fertile controls. CONCLUSION(S): Women with rigorously defined unexplained infertility have subtle hormonal anomalies during the luteal phase when compared with fertile controls.