McLean, J. A., Barr, S. I., & Prior, J. C. (2001). Dietary restraint, exercise, and bone density in young women: are they related? Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise, 33(8), 1292-1296. https://doi.org/10.1097/00005768-200108000-00008
McLean JA, Barr SI, Prior JC. Dietary restraint, exercise, and bone density in young women: are they related? Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2001;33(8):1292-1296. doi:10.1097/00005768-200108000-00008
McLean, J. A., et al. "Dietary restraint, exercise, and bone density in young women: are they related?" Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise, vol. 33, no. 8, 2001, pp. 1292-1296.
For EndNote, Zotero or Mendeley:
License
No open license is recorded for this paper. Reuse terms are set by the publisher.
Author affiliations
2 institutions
Vancouver Hospital and Health Sciences Centre05p83my93
Women with high scores for dietary restraint have been found to have higher 24-h urinary cortisol excretion and a higher prevalence of subclinical ovulatory disturbances, both of which may be risk factors for bone loss. The purpose of this study was to explore relationships between dietary restraint and bone health in regularly menstruating young women.
Methods
62 women (age: 21.7 +/- 2.5 yr) had body composition and total body and lumbar spine bone mineral density (BMD) and content (BMC) assessed using dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry. Dietary restraint was assessed using the restraint subscale from the Three-Factor Eating Questionnaire: 29 women had low restraint (LR; restraint score 0--5), 33 had high restraint (HR; restraint score 13--21). Exercise (h x wk(-1)) was assessed by questionnaire on two occasions.
Results
LR and HR women were similar in age and body composition (fat mass = 15.0 +/- 4.7 kg, lean mass = 40.9 +/- 4.9 kg), but HR women exercised more (3.4 +/- 1.7 vs 2.2 +/- 1.8 h x wk(-1), P < 0.05). Exercise was correlated with BMD and BMC, and when it was included as a covariate, total body BMC was significantly lower in HR than LR women. In multiple regression analysis, weekly hours of exercise and restraint score were significant predictors of total body BMD and BMC.
Conclusion
The observations of this cross-sectional study suggest that high levels of cognitive dietary restraint, or associated factors such as higher cortisol, may attenuate the positive effects of exercise on bone in young women.
Guthardt Y et al., 2026·Sci Rep·Free full text on PubMed Central
This systematic review and meta-analysis examined the relationship between menstrual cycle phases and the incidence of muscle injuries in female team sport athletes, following PRISMA 2020 and PERSiST guidelines. A comprehensive search was conducted in PubMed, Scopus, and SPORTDiscus from inception to mid-January 2024. Studies were included if they examined female team sport athletes of reproductive age with regular menstrual cycles and compared the occurrence of muscle injuries across at least two menstrual phases. Studies involving hormonal contraceptive use, medications affecting the menstrual cycle or musculoskeletal system, or menstrual dysfunction were excluded. Three studies met the inclusion criteria, involving 318 participants. Meta-analysis yielded a pooled Risk Ratio of 1.18 (95% CI: 0.75 to 1.86, p = 0.46) for injury risk between the luteal and follicular phases, suggesting no statistically significant association. However, the certainty of the cumulative evidence was rated as very low due to methodological limitations, including inconsistent phase classifications and reliance on imprecise methods for identifying menstrual phases. Consequently, no practical or clinical recommendations can be made at this time. Future research employing standardised, physiologically accurate methods for classifying and detecting menstrual cycle phases is necessary to better understand the potential links between hormonal fluctuations and injury risk.
Cross-sectional studies have found associations among elevated cognitive dietary restraint (CDR), increased ovulatory disturbances, and lower bone mass, possibly mediated by cortisol. To determine whether healthy young women with higher CDR have more menstrual cycles with subclinical ovulatory disturbances (SOD), elevated 24-h urinary free cortisol (UFC), and less positive 2-yr areal bone mineral density change (Delta-aBMD). DESIGN, SETTING, We conducted a 2-yr longitudinal study of 123 healthy, community-dwelling, nonobese, regularly menstruating women aged 19-35 yr. Key variables were Three Factor Eating Questionnaire Restraint score, percent of cycles with anvoluation and/or luteal phase length <10 d (%SOD), UFC, and Delta-aBMD at the lumbar spine (L1-L4), total hip, and whole body. Anthropometrics, general stress, physical activity, and energy intake were measured. Adjusting for potential confounders, differences were examined by general linear modeling using median split of CDR score and %SOD. Women with higher CDR had higher %SOD (56 vs. 34%, P < 0.001) and higher UFC (28.0 vs. 24.0 microg/d, P = 0.021). Delta-aBMD did not differ by CDR. Women with higher %SOD had less positive Delta-aBMD at L1-L4 (0.7 vs. 1.9%, P = 0.034) and hip (-0.6 vs. 0.9%, P = 0.001), and higher CDR score (8.7 vs. 7.1, P = 0.04). Physical activity, general stress, body mass index, and energy intake did not explain differences by CDR or %SOD. UFC was not associated with %SOD or Delta-aBMD. Women with more frequent SOD reported higher CDR and experienced less positive Delta-aBMD. Although women with higher CDR had higher UFC, the mechanism linking CDR, SOD, and aBMD is not clear.
Nutrition and Metabolic Health · Eating Disorders and Underfueling
We assessed the relationship between dietary restraint and menstrual cycle characteristics in 27 ovulatory women, previous participants in a longitudinal study of spinal cancellous bone mineral density (BMD). Subjects completed the restraint scale of the Three Factor Eating Questionnaire, recorded basal temperature and exercise for at least three menstrual cycles, and completed a 3-d food record. Cycle lengths of women in the upper and lower tertiles of scores for restraint were similar [27.8 +/- 1.0 (mean +/- SE) vs 27.6 +/- 0.8 d], but luteal phase length was shorter in the former group (8.6 +/- 0.9 vs 10.8 +/- 0.5 d, P < 0.05). Age, body mass index, percent body fat, waist-hip ratio, reported energy intake, and activity were similar between groups. Because the previous longitudinal study found associations between ovulatory disturbances and bone loss, we assessed spinal BMD using dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry (DXA) and quantitative computed tomography (QCT). BMD of women in upper and lower restraint tertiles, respectively, did not differ: DXA, 1.15 +/- 0.05 vs 1.20 +/- 0.06 g/cm2; and QCT, 140 +/- 7 vs 133 +/- 7 mg/cm3. Additional prospective studies, however, appear warranted. In conclusion, this study's results provide evidence that high dietary restraint is associated with a shortened luteal phase length.
Nutrition and Metabolic Health · Eating Disorders and Underfueling
Cognitive dietary restraint (CDR) is the
perception
of limiting food intake to achieve/maintain a perceived ideal body weight. The objective of this 2‐yr prospective study was to determine if women with higher CDR have more subclinical ovulation disturbances (SOD; anovulation or luteal phase <10 d), elevated cortisol excretion and less positive changes in areal bone mineral density over two years (ΔaBMD). Participants were 123 healthy, non‐obese, regularly menstruating women aged 19–35. Annually participants completed questionnaires (Three Factor Eating Questionnaire, physical activity, general stress, dietary intake), anthropometrics and 24‐hr urine collections for measurement of 24‐hr urinary free cortisol (UFC). At baseline and final follow‐up, dual energy x‐ray absorptiometry scans measured ΔaBMD at the lumbar spine (L1‐4), hip and total body. Quantitative waking temperature was used to determine SOD frequency. SOD correlated positively with CDR and inversely with hip ΔaBMD but not with UFC. CDR and UFC were not associated with each other or ΔaBMD. Women with higher CDR had more SOD. Women with more SOD had less positive ΔaBMD and higher CDR. Physical activity, general stress, body mass and energy intake did not explain differences by CDR or SOD. In conclusion, CDR was the only study variable associated with SOD which was associated with less positive ΔaBMD. Canadian Institutes of Health Research 79563.
Grant Funding Source
: Canadian Institute of Health Research
Cognitive dietary restraint, assessed by the Three-Factor Eating Questionnaire restraint subscale, is associated with subclinical menstrual cycle disturbances. This association may be mediated by stress-activated cortisol release. We assessed whether 24-h urinary cortisol excretion differs between women with high and low restraint scores.
Participants (aged 21.6+/-2.5 y; n = 62) with normal-length menstrual cycles and high (n = 33) or low (n = 29) restraint scores completed a questionnaire describing weight history, dietary practices, and exercise. Cortisol, calcium, and creatinine were measured in urine collected over 24 h on a day when all food and beverages were provided and measured. Previously, 3-d food records and anthropometric measurements were obtained. Age, height, weight, body mass index, and length of menstrual cycle were similar between groups. The reported amount of exercise was higher (3.4+/-1.7 compared with 2.2+/-1.8 h/wk; P<0.05) and energy intakes (assessed from 3-d and 24-h food records) were lower in the highthan in the low-restraint group. Ratios of urinary cortisol (nmol) to creatinine (mmol) were higher in the high-restraint than in the low-restraint group (42.9+/-12.9 compared with 36.3+/-8.9; P<0.05), whereas ratios of urinary calcium (mmol) to creatinine were lower (0.3+/-0.1 compared with 0.4+/-0.2; P<0.05) in the high-restraint group. Urinary cortisol was not associated with exercise, nutrient intakes, or anthropometric measurements. High dietary restraint scores are associated with urinary cortisol, a biological marker of stress, and high cortisol excretion may affect bone health. Our results suggest that further research is warranted to clarify these associations and to determine whether they persist over time.
Lifestyle and Environment › Nutrition and Metabolic Health › Eating Disorders and Underfueling · Bone Health › Bone Mineral Density › Peak Bone Mass
Susan I Barr, Jerilynn C Prior
Sue Barr, S Barr, J Prior
PMID 11474329 11474329 DOI 10.1097/00005768-200108000-00008 10.1097/00005768-200108000-00008 McLean et al. 2001, McLean 2001
Cite this article
McLean, J. A., Barr, S. I., & Prior, J. C. (2001). Dietary restraint, exercise, and bone density in young women: are they related? Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise, 33(8), 1292-1296. https://doi.org/10.1097/00005768-200108000-00008
McLean JA, Barr SI, Prior JC. Dietary restraint, exercise, and bone density in young women: are they related? Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2001;33(8):1292-1296. doi:10.1097/00005768-200108000-00008
McLean, J. A., et al. "Dietary restraint, exercise, and bone density in young women: are they related?" Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise, vol. 33, no. 8, 2001, pp. 1292-1296.
