Fertility and sterility, 2000

A randomized prospective study comparing pregnancy rates after clomiphene citrate and human menopausal gonadotropin before intrauterine insemination

Ecochard R, Mathieu C, Royere D, Blache G, Rabilloud M, Czyba JC

Author affiliations
  • Hospices Civils de Lyon ROR
DOI10.1016/s0015-0282(99)00474-4 PMID10632419
Read at source

Abstract

Objective

To determine whether hMG offers an advantage over clomiphene citrate (CC) in achieving pregnancy after IUI with husband's sperm.

Design

Randomized prospective trial.

Setting

Infertility patients in a university teaching hospital. PATIENT(S): Fifty-eight women under 39 years old undergoing ovulation induction before IUI. INTERVENTION(S): The women were assigned randomly to one of two treatment groups. Patients in group I (CCHH) received CC for the first two cycles and hMG for the last two cycles. Patients in group II (HHCC) received hMG for the first two cycles and CC for the last two cycles. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Cycle fecundity rates for the two treatment modalities were compared statistically with use of life-table analysis. RESULT(S): Of the 174 cycles studied, overall cycle fecundity rate was 11.11 (9 of 81 cycles) in the CCHH group and 10.75 (10 of 93 cycles) in the HHCC group. The difference was not statistically significant. The cycle fecundity rate was 14.44% (13 of 90 cycles) for cycles with CC and 7.14% (6 of 84) with hMG. The difference was not statistically significant. CONCLUSION(S): These data suggest that CC is an effective alternative to hMG in the population examined.

Topics

PMID 10632419 10632419 DOI 10.1016/s0015-0282(99)00474-4 10.1016/s0015-0282(99)00474-4 Ecochard et al. 2000, Ecochard 2000

Related articles