Decreased Performance of Skilled Laparoscopic Surgeons at Microlaparoscopy versus Traditional Laparoscopy

Rosser JC, Olive DL, Zreik T, Duleba A, Arici A, Rutherford T, Palter SF

The Journal of the American Association of Gynecologic Laparoscopists, 1996
DOI 10.1016/s1074-3804(96)80285-4 PMID 9074229

Abstract

The skill requirements for microlaparoscopy are significantly higher than those for the traditional technique. This program was designed to meet the demands of compensated two-dimensional depth perception, instrument accuracy, and ambidexterity. Three specialized drills were constructed and 60 experienced laparoscopists with advanced operative skills were evaluated. The three skill-assessment tasks were first performed using traditional laparoscopic instrumentation (10-mm laparoscopes, 5-mm accessory instruments). The performance of the study group was compared with an extensive database of over 1000 laparoscopic surgeons from around the world and did not reveal any significant deficits with traditional-size equipment. Next, the tasks were performed using miniature 2-mm laparoscopes and accessory instruments. Performance levels for all tasks were significantly lower than with traditional-size equipment. These results demonstrate the increased difficulty of performing laparoscopy with 2-mm instruments and underscore the importance of formal training and objective skill assessment. The relationship of skill to credentialing must be considered.

By this author

Related research

PMID 9074229 9074229 DOI 10.1016/s1074-3804(96)80285-4 10.1016/s1074-3804(96)80285-4 Rosser et al. 1996, Rosser 1996