Lifestyle and Environment · Environmental Exposures

Food packaging and bisphenol A and bis(2-ethyhexyl) phthalate exposure: findings from a dietary intervention

Rudel RA, Gray JM, Engel CL, Rawsthorne TW, Dodson RE, Ackerman JM, Rizzo J, Nudelman JL, Brody JG

Environmental health perspectives, 2011
DOI 10.1289/ehp.1003170 PMID 21450549 PMC PMC3223004

RRM Academy Synopsis

Three days of fresh food cut urine BPA by 66% in five families

In a dietary intervention study of 20 people in five families, three days of food without cans or plastic cut typical urinary bisphenol A (BPA) by 66%. Urinary breakdown products of DEHP, a second packaging chemical, fell by 53% to 56%. BPA returned to about its earlier level once usual diets resumed.

Key Findings

  • The typical (geometric mean) urinary BPA level fell by 66% during the fresh foods days, and the highest BPA level fell by 76%.
  • The typical levels of three DEHP breakdown products fell by 53% to 56%, and their highest levels fell by 93% to 96%.
  • After the usual diet resumed, BPA rose back to about its earlier level (p < 0.01). The DEHP breakdown products rose by 16% to 22%, a change that was not statistically significant.
  • Breakdown products of the other phthalates measured showed no significant change. One, from DBP and BBP, fell by a nonsignificant 25%.
  • Before the intervention, adults had higher median BPA and DEHP breakdown product levels than adults in a 2007 to 2008 national survey. Children's levels were similar to the national median for children.

Interpretation

The study is a before, during and after intervention in which each participant served as their own comparison over eight days. The 20 participants lived in the San Francisco Bay Area. The team chose the five eligible families that reported the most frequent canned food consumption. The outcome measured was chemical levels in urine. The authors note that the diet changed several things at once, so the specific change behind the reduction is hard to determine.

RRM Context

Restorative reproductive medicine looks for the root causes of hormone problems in the whole person and the home. Food is one way chemicals enter the body. The authors describe BPA and DEHP as associated with hormone disruption in animals and in some human studies. The paper adds measured exposure data from households.

Abstract

Background

Bisphenol A (BPA) and bis(2-ethylhexyl) phthalate (DEHP) are high-production-volume chemicals used in plastics and resins for food packaging. They have been associated with endocrine disruption in animals and in some human studies. Human exposure sources have been estimated, but the relative contribution of dietary exposure to total intake has not been studied empirically.

Objectives

To evaluate the contribution of food packaging to exposure, we measured urinary BPA and phthalate metabolites before, during, and after a "fresh foods" dietary intervention.

Methods

We selected 20 participants in five families based on self-reported use of canned and packaged foods. Participants ate their usual diet, followed by 3 days of "fresh foods" that were not canned or packaged in plastic, and then returned to their usual diet. We collected evening urine samples over 8 days in January 2010 and composited them into preintervention, during intervention, and postintervention samples. We used mixed-effects models for repeated measures and Wilcoxon signed-rank tests to assess change in urinary levels across time.

Results

Urine levels of BPA and DEHP metabolites decreased significantly during the fresh foods intervention [e.g., BPA geometric mean (GM), 3.7 ng/mL preintervention vs. 1.2 ng/mL during intervention; mono-(2-ethyl-5-hydroxy hexyl) phthalate GM, 57 ng/mL vs. 25 ng/mL]. The intervention reduced GM concentrations of BPA by 66% and DEHP metabolites by 53-56%. Maxima were reduced by 76% for BPA and 93-96% for DEHP metabolites.

Conclusions

BPA and DEHP exposures were substantially reduced when participants' diets were restricted to food with limited packaging.

Topics

By this author

Related research

Lifestyle and Environment › Environmental Exposures › Endocrine Disrupting Chemicals
Ruthann A Rudel, Janet M Gray, Connie L Engel, Teresa W Rawsthorne, Robin E Dodson, Janet M Ackerman, Jeanne Rizzo, Janet L Nudelman, Julia Green Brody
R Rudel, J Gray, C Engel, T Rawsthorne, R Dodson, J Ackerman, J Rizzo, J Nudelman, J Brody
PMID 21450549 21450549 DOI 10.1289/ehp.1003170 10.1289/ehp.1003170 Rudel et al. 2011, Rudel 2011