Male Fertility · Semen Analysis

Geographic differences in semen quality of fertile U.S. males

Swan SH, Brazil C, Drobnis EZ, Liu F, Kruse RL, Hatch M, Redmon JB, Wang C, Overstreet JW, Study For Future Families Research Group

Environmental health perspectives, 2003
DOI 10.1289/ehp.5927 PMID 12676592 PMC PMC1241421

RRM Academy Synopsis

Fertile men in Missouri had lower sperm concentration than in 3 cities

Fertile men in Missouri had lower sperm concentration than men in three other cities, a 2003 study of partners of 512 pregnant women found. Missouri's mean sperm concentration was 57% of New York's and 60% of Minnesota's. Semen volume and normal sperm shape differed little among the four cities.

Key Findings

  • Men in Columbia, Missouri, had significantly lower sperm concentration than men in New York, Minneapolis and Los Angeles. Missouri's mean was 57% of New York's and 60% of Minnesota's.
  • Missouri men also had fewer motile sperm in total, and the share of sperm that moved varied significantly from center to center.
  • Statistical models that accounted for age, race, smoking, recent fever, sexually transmitted disease history, abstinence time and analysis time still showed significant center differences (all p-values < 0.01).
  • Semen volume and the share of sperm with normal shape differed little from one center to the next.
  • In 1.1% of Missouri samples, all three criteria for fertile men (concentration, motility and normal shape) were met, against 8.5% of samples from the three urban centers (p < 0.001).

Interpretation

The study compared semen quality in four centers. All used the same protocols, technicians trained in one place and quality checks every quarter. Participants were partners of women at prenatal clinics. Couples with medically assisted pregnancies were excluded, and the authors describe the men as fertile. The authors rate the Missouri and Minnesota comparison as the least affected by confounding and selection bias. The two centers had comparable recruitment rates and similar demographics. The authors state that the analysis does not explain the differences between centers. They note Missouri's closeness to intensive agriculture and call for more study in semirural, agricultural communities.

RRM Context

Restorative reproductive medicine evaluates both partners. It treats male factor as a diagnosable cause of trouble conceiving. A European study planned alongside this one also found city differences: sperm concentration in Copenhagen was 74% of that in Turku. Semen results vary by place, and a cause-based evaluation weighs that setting.

Abstract

Although geographic variation in semen quality has been reported, this is the first study in the United States to compare semen quality among study centers using standardized methods and strict quality control. We evaluated semen specimens from partners of 512 pregnant women recruited through prenatal clinics in four U.S. cities during 1999-2001; 91% of men provided two specimens. Sperm concentration, semen volume, and motility were determined at the centers, and morphology was assessed at a central laboratory. Study protocols were identical across centers, and quality control was rigorously maintained. Sperm concentration was significantly lower in Columbia, Missouri, than in New York, New York; Minneapolis, Minnesota; and Los Angeles, California. Mean counts were 58.7, 102.9, 98.6, and 80.8 X 10(6)/mL (medians 53.5, 88.5, 81.8, and 64.8 X 10(6)/mL) in Missouri, New York, Minnesota, and California, respectively. The total number of motile sperm was also lower in Missouri than in other centers: 113, 196, 201, and 162 X 10(6) in Missouri, New York, Minnesota, and California, respectively. Semen volume and the percent morphologically normal sperm did not differ appreciably among centers. These between-center differences remained significant in multivariate models that controlled for abstinence time, semen analysis time, age, race, smoking, history of sexually transmitted disease, and recent fever (all p-values < 0.01). Confounding factors and differences in study methods are unlikely to account for the lower semen quality seen in this mid-Missouri population. These data suggest that sperm concentration and motility may be reduced in semirural and agricultural areas relative to more urban and less agriculturally exposed areas.

Topics

By this author

Related research

Male Fertility › Semen Analysis › Reference Standards · Research Methods › Study Design › Cohort Studies · Lifestyle and Environment › Environmental Exposures › Endocrine Disrupting Chemicals
Shanna H Swan, Charlene Brazil, Erma Z Drobnis, Fan Liu, Robin L Kruse, Maureen Hatch, J Bruce Redmon, Christina Wang, James W Overstreet
S Swan, C Brazil, E Drobnis, F Liu, R Kruse, M Hatch, C Wang, Jim Overstreet, Jimmy Overstreet, J Overstreet
PMID 12676592 12676592 DOI 10.1289/ehp.5927 10.1289/ehp.5927 Swan et al. 2003, Swan 2003