Andrology, 11(6), 973-986, 2023
Abstract
Background
The increase in paternal age and the percentage of births after assisted reproductive technologies (ART) may have consequences on offspring and society's position regarding access to ART must be questioned. Most countries recommend limiting ART to men under 60 years. What is the rationale for this threshold?
Objective
This systematic review assesses scientific arguments to establish links between paternal age, male fertility, and offspring health.
Material and Methods
Using the PRISMA guidelines, this systematic review of the literature analyzed 111 articles selected after screening PubMed, ScienceDirect, and Web of Science for articles published between January 1, 1995 and December 31, 2021.
Results
A strong correlation was highlighted between advanced paternal age and a decrease of some sperm parameters (semen volume and sperm motility) and infant morbidity (exponentially increased incidence of achondroplasia and Apert syndrome, and more moderately increased incidence of autism and schizophrenia). The impact of paternal age on pregnancy and fetal aneuploidy rates is more controversial. No association was found with spontaneous abortion rates.
Discussion and Conclusion
The scientific parameters should be explained to older parents undergoing ART. And for countries that discuss a limit on paternal age for access to ART, the debate requires consideration of social and ethical arguments.
Topics
Annabelle Gourinat, Charles Mazeaud, Jacques Hubert, Pascal Eschwege, Isabelle Koscinski
PMID 36640151 36640151 DOI 10.1111/andr.13385 10.1111/andr.13385 Gourinat et al. 2023, Gourinat 2023
Keywords
ART, advanced paternal age, fertility, sperm donation, urologic disease
Related articles
Safety and Risks · Long Term Child Outcomes
Long-term follow-up of ICSI-conceived offspring compared with spontaneously conceived offspring: a systematic review of health outcomes beyond the neonatal period
Catford SR et al., 2018 · Andrology
A significant increase in the use of intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) since its introduction in 1992 has been observed worldwide, including beyond its original intended use for severe male factor infertility. Concerns regarding ICSI include the effects of poor quality spermatozoa on offspring health and future fertility, and of the technique itself. The health and development of ICSI-conceived children beyond early infancy have not been comprehensively assessed. A systematic review of health outcomes of ICSI-conceived offspring beyond the neonatal period compared to spontaneously conceived (SC) offspring. PubMed, OVID Medline/Embase, InformIT, Web of Science, and ProQuest databases were searched for studies reporting on health outcomes in ICSI-conceived offspring beyond 28 days after birth. Physical and psychosocial health. The search strategy yielded 2826 articles. Of these, 2580 were not relevant or did not meet inclusion criteria and 138 were duplicates. One hundred and eight full-text papers were evaluated further, and 48 satisfied the inclusion criteria. Most studies reported on neurodevelopment during early infancy and childhood with reassuring results. Growth, vision, and hearing of ICSI and SC offspring also appear comparable, although important differences in general physical health, and particularly metabolic and reproductive health have been described, including recently poorer semen quality among ICSI-conceived young adult men compared to SC peers. Whilst neurodevelopment, growth, vision, and hearing appear similar between ICSI and SC children, evidence suggests differences in general physical health, and metabolic and reproductive endpoints. The clinical significance of many findings, however, remains unclear, and further prospective, large, and good quality studies with a focus on all these health outcomes in ICSI-conceived young adults are required.
Safety and Risks · Long Term Child Outcomes
Subfecundity, Infertility Treatment, and Child Neurodevelopment
Kahn LG et al., 2026 · JAMA Network Open
Increasing numbers of children are conceived using infertility treatment; concerns remain about potential effects on child neurodevelopment. To evaluate whether infertility treatment is associated with child neurodevelopment and whether such an association may be attributable to underlying subfecundity. DESIGN, SETTING, This cohort study was conducted among mother-child dyads in the National Institutes of Health Environmental Influences on Child Health Outcomes (ECHO) Cohort, with infants conceived between 1998 and 2022. Associations of subfecundity and infertility treatment with neurodevelopmental outcomes were assessed among children ages 2 to 10 years. Data were analyzed from May 14, 2025, to March 31, 2026. Subfecundity was defined as prior consultation for, treatment of, or diagnosis of infertility for either partner; at least 2 prior miscarriages; or ever having had unprotected heterosexual intercourse for 12 months without conceiving. Infertility treatment was categorized as in vitro fertilization (IVF) or non-IVF treatment. Harmonized caregiver responses to the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire and the Child Behavior Checklist yielded continuous raw scores for externalizing and internalizing problems. The total raw Social Responsiveness Scale (SRS) score quantified autism-like symptoms. Caregivers reported physician diagnosis of autism spectrum disorder (ASD) and attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD). Among 15 382 mother-infant dyads, there were 14 191 unique maternal participants (mean [SD] age at delivery, 30.9 [5.33] years; 8780 parous participants [57.1%]). ASD and ADHD were diagnosed in 876 offspring (7.6%) and 819 offspring (7.1%), respectively. In generalized linear models, subfecundity was associated with higher externalizing problem and SRS scores among all pregnancies (externalizing problems: b = 0.47 [95% CI, 0.14-0.81]; SRS score: b = 1.08 [95% CI, 0.01-2.14]) and when restricted to natural conceptions (externalizing problems: b = 0.45 [95% CI, 0.07-0.83]; SRS score: b = 1.12 [95% CI, -0.09 to 2.34]). Offspring of parents with subfecundity had higher odds of ASD (overall: odds ratio [OR], 1.27 [95% CI, 1.03-1.57]; natural conceptions: OR, 1.31 [95% CI, 1.04-1.64]). Children conceived via non-IVF treatment had higher odds of ADHD compared with those conceived via natural conception with subfecundity (OR, 1.77 [95% CI, 1.16-2.68]) or without subfecundity (OR, 1.54 [95% CI, 1.05-2.25]). There were no significant associations for IVF treatment. In this large US cohort study, subfecundity was associated with elevated scores for caregiver-reported symptoms of behavioral problems and higher odds of ASD diagnosis, independent of infertility treatment. Non-IVF treatment was associated with ADHD, warranting further research into specific indications for treatment that may increase risk of offspring neurodevelopmental problems.
Ovulation Physiology · Follicular Development
Unleashing the pharmacological potential of taste receptors in reproductive processes beyond their gustatory role
Magdy N et al., 2025 · Steroids
Traditionally, taste receptors (TRs) have been understood to reside within the taste buds on the tongue, serving as initiators for different taste perceptions. However, recent research has expanded our understanding, revealing that TRs are found throughout the body and perform a wide range of functions beyond taste perception as non-tasting functions. These receptors, along with their genetic variations, have been linked to various human health conditions. They are activated by an array of substances, including hormones, nutrients, and toxins, indicating their involvement in numerous biological processes. Specifically, in males, TRs are notably present in the testes and epididymis, where they contribute to the hormonal production, spermatogenesis, and sperm maturation. In females, these receptors are found in the ovaries, uterus, and myometrium, playing crucial roles in ovulation, menstrual cycle regulation, and embryo implantation. There are a lot of missed areas regarding TRs research that imposes to fulfill the gaps in the current understanding of their role in reproduction. This review aims to provide a comprehensive overview of the emerging roles of extraoral TRs in reproductive health, highlighting their physiological and pathophysiological significance in various reproductive processes. As well, grabbing the attention towards the release of new pharmacological interventions to manage conception and contraception in male and female was considered.
Safety and Risks · Long Term Child Outcomes
Sex differences in childhood cancer risk following ART conception: a registry-based study
Oakley LL et al., 2025 · Human reproduction (Oxford, England)
Does the risk of childhood cancer following ARTs vary by sex? In this registry-based study, some childhood cancers showed positive sex- and age-specific associations in children conceived using certain ART modalities, which were not evident in overall combined analyses. The relationship between ART and risk of childhood cancer has shown diverse outcomes in prior research. Studies examining whether there are sex differences in childhood cancer risk after ART conception are lacking. This registry-based cohort study included all children born in Norway between 1984 and 2022 (n = 2 255 025), followed until 31 December 2023. Children were identified via the Medical Birth Registry of Norway, and information was extracted on whether they were conceived via ART (defined as IVF/ICSI). Of the 2 255 025 children included in the study, 53 694 were ART-conceived. Birth records were linked to the Cancer Registry of Norway. Childhood cancer was defined as a cancer diagnosis according to the International Classification of Childhood Cancer Third Edition (ICCC-3) before the age of 18 years. Cox regression models were used to estimate the age- and sex-specific risk of cancer for ART-conceived children compared to children not conceived via ART. Among all children, 0.25% had a cancer diagnosis before the age of 18 years. The cumulative incidence of cancer was higher in children conceived by ART (IVF/ICSI) than in those not conceived via ART (21.5 vs 17.5 per 100 000 person-years, P = 0.04), and especially higher in boys conceived with ICSI or after cryopreserved embryo transfer. When combining all age groups, both sexes and all cancer types, there was little evidence of increased cancer risk with ART (adjusted hazard ratio (aHR) 1.13, 95% CI 0.94-1.36). However, differences were found when stratifying by age and sex. From age 5-9 years, ART-conceived children had a higher overall risk of cancer (aHR 1.53, 95% CI 1.06-2.20), with a slightly higher estimate in boys (aHR 1.73, 95% CI 1.09-2.74), than in girls (aHR 1.28, 95% CI 0.70-2.33). The risk was not higher up to age 5 years, or after age 10 years. In combined analyses, there was no overall increased risk after ICSI. When stratifying by sex, a higher risk was seen after ICSI for boys (aHR 1.69, 95% CI 1.18-2.42), but not for girls (aHR 0.65, 95% CI 0.37-1.16). The combined risk after cryopreservation (aHR 1.42, 95% CI 0.95-2.13) was driven by a higher risk in boys (aHR 1.79, 95% CI 1.09-2.94), while no evidence of an association was found in girls (aHR 1.01, 95% CI 0.50-2.03). No increased risk was seen with IVF or after fresh transfer for either boys or girls. Childhood cancer is a rare outcome, and some analyses of cancer subtypes were likely underpowered. Results from this large registry-based study suggest that addressing age- and sex-specific differences in the risk of childhood cancer following ART conception reveals increased risks for certain groups. Our findings require further study with consideration of possible underlying sex-specific mechanisms related to ART and different childhood cancers. This work was funded by: the Research Council of Norway through its Centres of Excellence Funding Scheme (project number 262700); the Norwegian Cancer Association (project number 244291); and the Norwegian Institute of Public Health. The funding agencies had no role in the conceptualization, design, data collection, analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript. The authors declare no conflict of interests. N/A.