Infertility Evaluation

National, regional, and global trends in infertility prevalence since 1990: a systematic analysis of 277 health surveys

Mascarenhas MN, Flaxman SR, Boerma T, Vanderpoel S, Stevens GA

PLoS medicine, 9(12), e1001356, 2012
DOI 10.1371/journal.pmed.1001356 PMID 23271957 PMC PMC3525527

RRM Academy Synopsis

Global infertility rates changed little from 1990 to 2010

Among women who wanted a child, infertility rates changed little in most world regions over two decades. A model used 277 household surveys to estimate rates for 190 countries and territories. An estimated 48.5 million couples had no live birth after five years of exposure in 2010. The count rose from 42.0 million in 1990 as populations grew.

Key Findings

  • In 2010, primary infertility (no first live birth) affected 1.9% of women aged 20–44 y who wanted a child; the 95% uncertainty interval ran from 1.7% to 2.2%.
  • Among women who wanted another child and had already given birth, 10.5% had secondary infertility (no further live birth) in 2010, with an interval of 9.5% to 11.7%.
  • Regional primary infertility in 2010 spanned 1.5% in Latin America/Caribbean (1.2% to 1.8%) up to 2.6% in North Africa/Middle East (2.1% to 3.1%).
  • Sub-Saharan Africa showed the clearest decline: primary infertility went from 2.7% (2.5% to 3.0%) to 1.9% (1.8% to 2.1%), and secondary from 13.5% (12.5% to 14.5%) to 11.6% (10.6% to 12.6%).
  • Couples affected by infertility numbered 42.0 million in 1990 (39.6 million to 44.8 million) and 48.5 million in 2010 (45.0 million to 52.6 million).

Interpretation

The authors fitted a Bayesian hierarchical model to women's survey interviews, so each figure is a modeled estimate for a country, year and age group. Here infertility means a woman had no live birth despite 5 y in a union without contraceptives while wanting a child. Estimates center on the female partner. The authors note that infertility treated successfully within that window goes uncounted and that a shorter window would roughly double the rates.

RRM Context

The authors point out that either partner, or both, may be the source of infertility in a couple. A population rate shows how common infertility is. It gives no reason for any one couple's difficulty. Restorative reproductive medicine looks for that reason in both partners, so the cause can be treated. The authors write that current evidence, mostly from clinical studies, points to infections that block the fallopian tubes as the main reason infertility changes over time and differs between populations.

Abstract

Background

Global, regional, and national estimates of prevalence of and tends in infertility are needed to target prevention and treatment efforts. By applying a consistent algorithm to demographic and reproductive surveys available from developed and developing countries, we estimate infertility prevalence and trends, 1990 to 2010, by country and region.

Methods and Findings

We accessed and analyzed household survey data from 277 demographic and reproductive health surveys using a consistent algorithm to calculate infertility. We used a demographic infertility measure with live birth as the outcome and a 5-y exposure period based on union status, contraceptive use, and desire for a child. We corrected for biases arising from the use of incomplete information on past union status and contraceptive use. We used a Bayesian hierarchical model to estimate prevalence of and trends in infertility in 190 countries and territories. In 2010, among women 20-44 y of age who were exposed to the risk of pregnancy, 1.9% (95% uncertainty interval 1.7%, 2.2%) were unable to attain a live birth (primary infertility). Out of women who had had at least one live birth and were exposed to the risk of pregnancy, 10.5% (9.5%, 11.7%) were unable to have another child (secondary infertility). Infertility prevalence was highest in South Asia, Sub-Saharan Africa, North Africa/Middle East, and Central/Eastern Europe and Central Asia. Levels of infertility in 2010 were similar to those in 1990 in most world regions, apart from declines in primary and secondary infertility in Sub-Saharan Africa and primary infertility in South Asia (posterior probability [pp] ≥0.99). Although there were no statistically significant changes in the prevalence of infertility in most regions amongst women who were exposed to the risk of pregnancy, reduced child-seeking behavior resulted in a reduction of primary infertility among all women from 1.6% to 1.5% (pp=0.90) and a reduction of secondary infertility among all women from 3.9% to 3.0% (pp>0.99) from 1990 to 2010. Due to population growth, however, the absolute number of couples affected by infertility increased from 42.0 million (39.6 million, 44.8 million) in 1990 to 48.5 million (45.0 million, 52.6 million) in 2010. Limitations of the study include gaps in survey data for some countries and the use of proxies to determine exposure to pregnancy.

Conclusions

We analyzed demographic and reproductive household survey data to reveal global patterns and trends in infertility. Independent from population growth and worldwide declines in the preferred number of children, we found little evidence of changes in infertility over two decades, apart from in the regions of Sub-Saharan Africa and South Asia. Further research is needed to identify the etiological causes of these patterns and trends.

Topics

Related research

Infertility › Evaluation › Prevalence and Incidence · Research Methods › Evidence Synthesis › Systematic Reviews
Maya N Mascarenhas, Seth R Flaxman, Ties Boerma, Sheryl Vanderpoel, Gretchen A Stevens
M Mascarenhas, S Flaxman, T Boerma, S Vanderpoel, G Stevens
PMID 23271957 23271957 DOI 10.1371/journal.pmed.1001356 10.1371/journal.pmed.1001356 Mascarenhas et al. 2012, Mascarenhas 2012