Fertility Awareness Effectiveness

Natural Cycles app: contraceptive outcomes and demographic analysis of UK users

Pearson JT, Chelstowska M, Rowland SP, Mcilwaine E, Benhar E, Berglund Scherwitzl E, Walker S, Gemzell Danielsson K, Scherwitzl R

Published April 2021 The European Journal of Contraception & Reproductive Health Care : the Official Journal of the European Society of Contraception, 26(2), 105-110
DOI 10.1080/13625187.2020.1867844 PMID 33539252

Abstract

Purpose

Digital fertility awareness-based contraception offers an alternative choice for women who do not wish to use hormonal or invasive methods. The aim of this study was to investigate the key demographics of current users of the Natural Cycles app and assess the contraceptive outcomes of women preventing pregnancy in a UK cohort of women.

Materials and Methods

This was a real world observational prospective observational study. The typical-use effectiveness of the method was calculated using both 13-cycle cumulative probability of pregnancy (life table analysis) and Pearl Index for the entire study cohort. Perfect-use PI was calculated using data from cycles where sexual intercourse during the fertile window was marked as protected and no unprotected sex was recorded on fertile days.

Results

12,247 women were included in the study and contributed an average of 9.9 months of data for a total of 10,066 woman years of exposure. The mean age of the cohort was 30, mean BMI 23.4, the majority were in a stable relationship (83.2%) and had a university degree or higher (83%). The one year typical use, PI was 6.1 (95% CI: 5.6, 6.6) and with perfect-use was 2.0 (95% CI: 1.3, 2.8). 13 cycle pregnancy probability was 7.1%.

Conclusions

This is the first study which describes the use of a digital contraceptive by women in the UK. It describes the demographics of users and how they correlate with the apps effectiveness at preventing pregnancy.

Read the guide

Topics

By this author

Related research

Fertility Awareness › Effectiveness › Typical and Perfect Use
Jack T Pearson, Magda Chelstowska, Simon P Rowland, Emily Mcilwaine, Eleonora Benhar, Elina Berglund Scherwitzl, Susan Walker, Kristina Gemzell Danielsson, Raoul Scherwitzl
John Pearson, J Pearson, M Chelstowska, S Rowland, E Mcilwaine, E Benhar, E Scherwitzl, Sue Walker, S Walker, K Danielsson, R Scherwitzl
PMID 33539252 33539252 DOI 10.1080/13625187.2020.1867844 10.1080/13625187.2020.1867844 Pearson et al. 2021, Pearson 2021