General Gynecology Infections

Pelvic inflammatory disease and salpingitis: incidence of primary and repeat episodes in England

Price MJ, Ades AE, Welton NJ, Simms I, Horner PJ

Published January 2017 Epidemiology and Infection, 145(1), 208-215
DOI 10.1017/S0950268816002065 PMID 27678278

RRM Academy Synopsis

PID Estimated to Affect 33.6% of Women Aged 35-44 in England

A statistical model finds that among women in England aged 35 to 44, 33.6% have had PID at some point, whether or not it was diagnosed, and 16.1% have had salpingitis. PID is pelvic inflammatory disease. Routine health records and other published data fed the estimate.

About 3 in 10 women aged 35 to 44 in England were estimated to have had PID
About 3 in 10 women aged 35 to 44 in England were estimated to have had PID. Source: Price MJ et al., 2017, PMID 27678278.
Study at a glance, statistical model: An estimated 33.6% of women aged 35-44 in England have had PID
Study at a glance, statistical model of women in England aged 35 to 44: An estimated 33.6% of women aged 35-44 in England have had PID. Source: Price MJ et al., 2017, PMID 27678278.

Key Findings

  • Among women aged 35-44 in England, an estimated 33.6% had experienced at least one PID episode and 16.1% had experienced at least one salpingitis episode, diagnosed or not.
  • Among women aged 35-44, 10.7% had one salpingitis episode and no further PID episode, 3.7% had one further PID episode, and 1.7% had two or more further PID episodes.
  • In the Lund validation cohort, 22.1% of women aged 16-24 with an index salpingitis episode had a further PID episode within 8 years, versus 11% of women aged 25-44.
  • The model's estimated cumulative diagnosed PID, about 10% by age 31, was considerably higher than the 2.2% that the UK's Natsal survey reported for women aged 16-44.

Interpretation

Researchers built a statistical model to estimate how common PID and salpingitis were in England in 2002, before the national chlamydia screening program began. The model drew on routine clinical records, prior studies, and other published data. The authors note that the model assumes PID rates stay constant within four age bands, spanning ages 16 to 44. The model's estimate of diagnosed PID was far higher than the rate found by the UK's Natsal survey. This points to a lot of undiagnosed PID. The findings support further study of PID surveillance and of how often undiagnosed pelvic infection leads to tubal factor infertility.

RRM Context

PID and salpingitis are known causes of tubal factor infertility. They are also a major risk factor for ectopic pregnancy. This risk rises with each repeat episode, earlier research found. Restorative reproductive medicine considers a couple's full history. Past pelvic infection is part of that history. Knowing how common PID and salpingitis are, including the undiagnosed share, can guide how closely a clinician looks for a tubal cause.

Abstract

Pelvic inflammatory disease (PID) and more specifically salpingitis (visually confirmed inflammation) is the primary cause of tubal factor infertility and is an important risk factor for ectopic pregnancy. The risk of these outcomes increases following repeated episodes of PID. We developed a homogenous discrete-time Markov model for the distribution of PID history in the UK. We used a Bayesian framework to fully propagate parameter uncertainty into the model outputs. We estimated the model parameters from routine data, prospective studies, and other sources. We estimated that for women aged 35-44 years, 33·6% and 16·1% have experienced at least one episode of PID and salpingitis, respectively (diagnosed or not) and 10·7% have experienced one salpingitis and no further PID episodes, 3·7% one salpingitis and one further PID episode, and 1·7% one salpingitis and ⩾2 further PID episodes. Results are consistent with numerous external data sources, but not all. Studies of the proportion of PID that is diagnosed, and the proportion of PIDs that are salpingitis together with the severity distribution in different diagnostic settings and of overlap between routine data sources of PID would be valuable.

Topics

Related research

General Gynecology › Infections › Pelvic Inflammatory Disease · Research Methods › Measurement and Statistics › Statistical Methods · Infertility › Tubal Factor › Distal Tubal Disease
PMID 27678278 27678278 DOI 10.1017/S0950268816002065 10.1017/S0950268816002065 Price et al. 2017, Price 2017