Assisted Reproduction · Safety and Risks

Sex differences in childhood cancer risk following ART conception: a registry-based study

Oakley LL, Kristjansson D, Munthe-Kaas MC, Nguyen HT, Lee Y, Hanevik HI, Romundstad LB, Lyle R, Håberg SE

Published February 2025 Human reproduction (Oxford, England)
DOI 10.1093/humrep/deae285 PMID 39724532 PMC PMC11788205

RRM Academy Synopsis

Boys conceived by ICSI had higher childhood cancer risk in Norway

A registry cohort of over 2 million Norwegian children found boys conceived by ICSI had a higher childhood cancer risk (adjusted hazard ratio 1.69). ICSI-conceived girls showed no evidence of higher risk. Overall, IVF or ICSI conception showed no strong evidence of higher cancer risk. Risk was higher at ages 5 to 9 years, with little evidence at other ages.

Key Findings

  • The cohort held 2 255 025 children, and 53 694 were ART-conceived (IVF/ICSI). Among those, 126 had cancer before age 18: adjusted hazard ratio 1.13 (95% CI 0.94, 1.36).
  • At ages 5 to 9 years, the adjusted hazard ratio was 1.53 (95% CI 1.06, 2.20) overall, 1.73 (95% CI 1.09, 2.74) in boys and 1.28 (95% CI 0.70, 2.33) in girls.
  • ICSI-conceived boys had an adjusted hazard ratio of 1.69 (95% CI 1.18, 2.42) with 32 cases. ICSI-conceived girls had 0.65 (95% CI 0.37, 1.16) with 12 cases.
  • After cryopreserved embryo transfer, the adjusted hazard ratio was 1.42 (95% CI 0.95, 2.13) overall, 1.79 (95% CI 1.09, 2.94) in boys and 1.01 (95% CI 0.50, 2.03) in girls.
  • For leukemia, the adjusted hazard ratio among ART-conceived boys was 1.60 (95% CI 1.04, 2.46) with 23 cases. Among ART-conceived girls, the paper reports no evidence of increased leukemia risk.

Interpretation

This cohort study followed children recorded in Norwegian national registries. The comparison group held all other children, including births after intrauterine insemination and ovulation induction. Childhood cancer was rare, and the authors judged some analyses likely underpowered. The reason for ART was not available for the whole study period. The authors describe separating the effect of the procedure from the effect of the parents' infertility as challenging. In Norway, ICSI is mainly used for male factor infertility. The analysis did not adjust for maternal smoking, body mass index or parental socioeconomic status.

RRM Context

ART goes around the problem without finding why conception fails. Restorative reproductive medicine looks for the cause of infertility in both partners first. The authors note that ICSI use keeps rising in cases without male factor infertility.

Abstract

Does the risk of childhood cancer following ARTs vary by sex? In this registry-based study, some childhood cancers showed positive sex- and age-specific associations in children conceived using certain ART modalities, which were not evident in overall combined analyses. The relationship between ART and risk of childhood cancer has shown diverse outcomes in prior research. Studies examining whether there are sex differences in childhood cancer risk after ART conception are lacking. This registry-based cohort study included all children born in Norway between 1984 and 2022 (n = 2 255 025), followed until 31 December 2023. Children were identified via the Medical Birth Registry of Norway, and information was extracted on whether they were conceived via ART (defined as IVF/ICSI). Of the 2 255 025 children included in the study, 53 694 were ART-conceived. Birth records were linked to the Cancer Registry of Norway. Childhood cancer was defined as a cancer diagnosis according to the International Classification of Childhood Cancer Third Edition (ICCC-3) before the age of 18 years. Cox regression models were used to estimate the age- and sex-specific risk of cancer for ART-conceived children compared to children not conceived via ART. Among all children, 0.25% had a cancer diagnosis before the age of 18 years. The cumulative incidence of cancer was higher in children conceived by ART (IVF/ICSI) than in those not conceived via ART (21.5 vs 17.5 per 100 000 person-years, P = 0.04), and especially higher in boys conceived with ICSI or after cryopreserved embryo transfer. When combining all age groups, both sexes and all cancer types, there was little evidence of increased cancer risk with ART (adjusted hazard ratio (aHR) 1.13, 95% CI 0.94-1.36). However, differences were found when stratifying by age and sex. From age 5-9 years, ART-conceived children had a higher overall risk of cancer (aHR 1.53, 95% CI 1.06-2.20), with a slightly higher estimate in boys (aHR 1.73, 95% CI 1.09-2.74), than in girls (aHR 1.28, 95% CI 0.70-2.33). The risk was not higher up to age 5 years, or after age 10 years. In combined analyses, there was no overall increased risk after ICSI. When stratifying by sex, a higher risk was seen after ICSI for boys (aHR 1.69, 95% CI 1.18-2.42), but not for girls (aHR 0.65, 95% CI 0.37-1.16). The combined risk after cryopreservation (aHR 1.42, 95% CI 0.95-2.13) was driven by a higher risk in boys (aHR 1.79, 95% CI 1.09-2.94), while no evidence of an association was found in girls (aHR 1.01, 95% CI 0.50-2.03). No increased risk was seen with IVF or after fresh transfer for either boys or girls. Childhood cancer is a rare outcome, and some analyses of cancer subtypes were likely underpowered. Results from this large registry-based study suggest that addressing age- and sex-specific differences in the risk of childhood cancer following ART conception reveals increased risks for certain groups. Our findings require further study with consideration of possible underlying sex-specific mechanisms related to ART and different childhood cancers. This work was funded by: the Research Council of Norway through its Centres of Excellence Funding Scheme (project number 262700); the Norwegian Cancer Association (project number 244291); and the Norwegian Institute of Public Health. The funding agencies had no role in the conceptualization, design, data collection, analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript. The authors declare no conflict of interests. N/A.

Topics

By this author

Related research

Assisted Reproduction › Safety and Risks › Long Term Child Outcomes
PMID 39724532 39724532 DOI 10.1093/humrep/deae285 10.1093/humrep/deae285 Oakley et al. 2025, Oakley 2025