Menstrual Cycle Cycle Disorders

The COVID-19 pandemic and the menstrual cycle: research gaps and opportunities

Sharp GC, Fraser A, Sawyer G, Kountourides G, Easey KE, Ford G, Olszewska Z, Howe LD, Lawlor DA, Alvergne A, Maybin JA

Published June 13, 2022 International journal of epidemiology, 51(3), 691-700
DOI 10.1093/ije/dyab239 PMID 34865021 PMC PMC8690231

RRM Academy Synopsis

Menstrual cycle changes during COVID-19 lack strong evidence

This literature review describes research on period changes during the COVID-19 pandemic, published through August 2021. Among the 12 studies found, nine were on period changes during the pandemic and three were on changes tied to COVID-19 illness. Over 30,000 reports of period changes after COVID-19 vaccination reached the UK's yellow card scheme by September 2021.

Key Findings

  • The review identified 12 small studies through 31 August 2021. Nine covered cycle changes during the pandemic period, and 3 covered changes tied to COVID-19 illness itself.
  • Only 1 of the 12 studies used a validated questionnaire, the Premenstrual Symptoms Screening Tool. None made full use of the FIGO standardized measures for cycle frequency, duration, regularity, or volume.
  • A study of 30,000 Japanese women linked HPV vaccination to higher rates of hospital visits for abnormal bleeding (OR 1.43, 95% CI 1.13-1.82) and irregular periods (OR 1.29, 95% CI 1.12-1.49).
  • As of early September 2021, more than 30,000 reports of menstrual changes after COVID-19 vaccination had reached the UK's yellow card scheme. The review's search found no formal studies of the link.
  • Nine of the 12 studies came from low- or middle-income countries. Four of the 12 either stratified by hormonal contraceptive use or excluded users from their sample.

Interpretation

This is a literature review of published research. The authors searched PubMed, Scopus, and preprint sites using a set plan. They found 12 studies on period changes linked to the COVID-19 pandemic. The authors note that only one of the 12 studies used a standard survey tool. None used the full FIGO measures for period length, timing, regularity, or flow. The review lists open questions about pandemic stress, illness, treatment, and vaccines. The authors call for shared measures and a research network to study this link. The findings support larger, more rigorous studies of period changes linked to the pandemic and its vaccines.

RRM Context

The paper treats the menstrual cycle as a vital sign. The framing matches how NaProTechnology and other fertility awareness-based methods use daily cycle charting to track hormonal health. The paper also suggests that existing cycle-tracking apps could supply some of the missing long-term data on menstrual cycle changes.

Abstract not indexed.

Topics

By this author

Related research

Menstrual Cycle › Cycle Disorders › Abnormal Uterine Bleeding · Research Methods › Evidence Synthesis › Systematic Reviews
Gemma C Sharp, Abigail Fraser, Gemma Sawyer, Gabriella Kountourides, Kayleigh E Easey, Gemma Ford, Zuzanna Olszewska, Laura D Howe, Deborah A Lawlor, Alexandra Alvergne, Jacqueline A Maybin
G Sharp, Abby Fraser, A Fraser, G Sawyer, G Kountourides, K Easey, G Ford, Z Olszewska, L Howe, Debbie Lawlor, Deb Lawlor, D Lawlor, Alex Alvergne, A Alvergne, J Maybin
PMID 34865021 34865021 DOI 10.1093/ije/dyab239 10.1093/ije/dyab239 Sharp et al. 2022, Sharp 2022