Lifestyle and Environment · Environmental Exposures

Usage of Children's Makeup and Body Products in the United States and Implications for Childhood Environmental Exposures

Medley EA, Kruchten KE, Spratlen MJ, Ureño M, Cole A, Joglekar R, Herbstman JB

Published January 24, 2023 International journal of environmental research and public health
DOI 10.3390/ijerph20032114 PMID 36767480 PMC PMC9915933

RRM Academy Synopsis

Most children in a US parent survey have used makeup and body products

A mixed methods survey of 207 parents and guardians in the United States found that 7 out of 10 children aged 12 or younger had used makeup and body products. About half of the children who used them were reported to use them for play.

Key Findings

  • Parents and guardians reported that 219 of 312 children aged 12 or younger (70%) had used the products. Use was higher among older (p = 0.011) and female children (p = 0.014).
  • Among the 217 children who used them, 60% used body products, 44% hair, 41% face, and 18% eye products. Of these children, 36% used mostly children's products.
  • Among users, 54% used the products at least monthly, 12% daily, and 22% typically for 8 or more hours. In the last year, 31% were reported to have ingested them.
  • Parents rated motivation from 1 (all play) to 10 (all beautification): median 6, most common response 1 (21%). Among users, 51% used the products in group or solo play.
  • Compared with non-Hispanic parents or guardians, Hispanic/Latinx parents reported more frequent use (p = 0.047), shorter use (p < 0.001), and lower ratings on the play to beautification scale (p = 0.039).

Interpretation

The study is a cross-sectional survey in which parents and guardians reported on their children's use of these products. Recruitment used email, social media, and flyers in three metropolitan areas, and respondents lived in 32 states. The authors note that the sample is not nationally representative. They call the work an introduction to a new area of early life exposure.

RRM Context

RRM considers hormone health across the whole lifespan, so early exposures matter. The paper lists hormone-disrupting chemicals in cosmetics, such as phthalates and parabens. It also cites a 2018 study that associated early use of some hair products with earlier puberty. The authors say a better understanding of use may help regulators improve product safety standards.

Abstract

There is growing evidence of toxicity associated with ingredients found in cosmetics and personal care products. Children's makeup and body products (CMBPs) are widely marketed to children throughout the US; however, little is known about how and why children use them. We administered a survey to parents/guardians of children aged ≤12 years about the use of CMBPs. Among all the children (n = 312) of survey respondents (n = 207), 219 (70%) have used CMBPs in their lifetime. Older children used CMBPs at higher rates than younger children, and female children used CMBPs at higher rates than male children. Children of Hispanic/Latinx parents/guardians used CMBPs more often and for shorter durations and a greater proportion used lip, hair, and fragrance products than children of non-Hispanic parents/guardians. Approximately half the children that use CMBPs were reported to use them with play intentions. Compared to children of non-Hispanic parents/guardians, children of Hispanic/Latinx parents/guardians reported more play motivations for CMBP use. Using qualitative analysis approaches, responses suggest CMBPs are commonly used for fun or play activities. This mixed methods analysis serves as an introduction to understanding early life exposures to this unique and understudied class of products.

Topics

By this author

Related research

Lifestyle and Environment › Environmental Exposures › Personal Care and Household Products
Eleanor A Medley, Kendall E Kruchten, Miranda J Spratlen, Maricela Ureño, Anabel Cole, Rashmi Joglekar, Julie B Herbstman
E Medley, K Kruchten, M Spratlen, M Ureño, A Cole, R Joglekar, J Herbstman
PMID 36767480 36767480 DOI 10.3390/ijerph20032114 10.3390/ijerph20032114 Medley et al. 2023, Medley 2023