Pregnancy · Early Pregnancy

A randomized study comparing Crinone 8% and intramuscular progesterone supplementation in in vitro fertilization-embryo transfer cycles

Propst AM, Hill JA, Ginsburg ES, Hurwitz S, Politch J, Yanushpolsky EH

Published December 4, 2001 Fertility and Sterility, 76(6), 1144-1149
DOI 10.1016/s0015-0282(01)02872-2 PMID 11730742

Abstract

Objective

To compare the efficacy of Crinone 8% intravaginal progesterone gel vs. IM progesterone for luteal phase and early pregnancy support after IVF-ET.

Design

Randomized, open-label study.

Setting

Academic medical center.

Patients

Two hundred and one women undergoing IVF-ET.

Interventions

Women were randomized to supplementation with Crinone 8% (90 mg once daily) or IM progesterone (50 mg once daily) beginning the day after oocyte retrieval.

Main Outcome Measures

Pregnancy, embryo implantation, and live birth rates.

Results

The women randomized to luteal phase supplementation with IM progesterone had significantly higher clinical pregnancy (48.5% vs. 30.4%; odds ratio [OR], 2.16; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.21, 3.87), embryo implantation (24.1% vs. 17.5%; OR, 1.89; 95% CI, 1.08, 3.30), and live birth rates (39.4% vs. 24.5%; OR, 2.00; 95% CI, 1.10, 3.70) than women randomized to Crinone 8%.

Conclusions

In women undergoing IVF-ET, once-a-day progesterone supplementation with Crinone 8%, beginning the day after oocyte retrieval, resulted in significantly lower embryo implantation, clinical pregnancy, and live birth rates compared with women supplemented with IM progesterone.

Topics

By this author

Related research

Pregnancy › Early Pregnancy › Progesterone Support · Therapeutics › Hormonal Agents › Progesterone and Progestins · Assisted Reproduction › Add-Ons and Adjuncts › Adjunct Evidence Base
Anthony M Propst, Joseph A Hill, Elizabeth S Ginsburg, Shelley Hurwitz, Joseph Politch, Elena H Yanushpolsky
Tony Propst, A Propst, Joe Hill, Joey Hill, J Hill, Liz Ginsburg, Beth Ginsburg, Betsy Ginsburg, E Ginsburg, S Hurwitz, Joe Politch, Joey Politch, J Politch, E Yanushpolsky
PMID 11730742 11730742 DOI 10.1016/s0015-0282(01)02872-2 10.1016/s0015-0282(01)02872-2 Propst et al. 2001, Propst 2001