what is near-contact laparoscopy, why was my laparoscopy normal but I still have symptoms, missed endometriosis on laparoscopy, how is endometriosis hidden in peritoneal pockets, diagnostic laparoscopy technique for endometriosis, repeat laparoscopy after normal result, uterosacral ligament endometriosis peritoneal pocket, systematic pelvic evaluation laparoscopy
Cite this article
Hilgers, T. W. (2004). Chapter 63: Diagnostic Laparoscopy: "Near Contact" Approach. The Medical and Surgical Practice of NaProTECHNOLOGY, 845-854.
Hilgers TW. Chapter 63: Diagnostic Laparoscopy: "Near Contact" Approach. The Medical and Surgical Practice of NaProTECHNOLOGY. 2004:845-854.
Hilgers, T. W. "Chapter 63: Diagnostic Laparoscopy: "Near Contact" Approach." The Medical and Surgical Practice of NaProTECHNOLOGY, 2004, pp. 845-854.
Hilgers TW, 2004·The Medical and Surgical Practice of NaProTECHNOLOGY
Surgical NaProTECHNOLOGY is defined as a cooperative surgical discipline that corrects reproductive pathology identified through CrMS monitoring and targeted diagnostic workup, employing microsurgical and laser techniques that maximize tissue preservation and minimize adhesion formation. The philosophical and technical distinctions from conventional gynecologic surgery are established, emphasizing restorative intent and anatomical precision as core principles.
Ethics/PhilosophyDecision-Making FrameworksCatholic Medical Ethics
Hilgers TW, 2004·The Medical and Surgical Practice of NaProTECHNOLOGY
The CREIGHTON MODEL FertilityCare System (CrMS) rests on a decades-long body of research demonstrating that cervical mucus functions as a physiologically regulated biological valve, opening predictably at the periovulatory estrogen rise and closing in the post-Peak phase. Chapter 15 of Hilgers (2004) synthesizes hormonal, ultrasound, cytologic, and biophysical evidence to establish that a woman's external observation of her Peak Day reliably identifies the fertile window, and documents the system's effectiveness data for both achieving and avoiding pregnancy across a five-study meta-analysis of nearly 1,900 couples.