Endometriosis · Diagnosis
Abstract
Endometriosis is a known contributor to infertility, but the gold standard for its diagnosis is surgical. Therefore, it is important for clinicians to be able to predict which women with infertility are at high risk for endometriosis and thus should be offered laparoscopy. We sought to identify the clinical predictors of endometriosis in the infertility population.
We conducted a retrospective review of patients at an academic infertility centre. The primary outcome was identification of endometriosis at laparoscopy, and we used logistic regression to test clinical variables for their ability to predict endometriosis.
Primary infertility, dysmenorrhea, and uterosacral/cul-de-sac nodularity were significant independent predictors of finding endometriosis at laparoscopy. Other clinical variables (including hysterosalpingogram findings) were not independent predictors of endometriosis, and physicians with an endometriosis-focused practice were more likely to diagnose endometriosis at laparoscopy.
Key predictors of endometriosis in the infertility population are primary infertility, dysmenorrhea, and uterosacral/cul-de-sac nodularity. These results will be used to develop and validate a formal clinical prediction model for endometriosis in infertile women.
Topics
By this author
Endometriosis Pain Index: development of a model to predict poor pain-related quality of life after endometriosis surgery through machine learning analysis of registry data
Tucker DR et al., 2026 · Pain · Free to read
Predictive tools are lacking for pain-related outcomes after endometriosis surgery. The objective of this study was to develop and validate a machine learning-based clinical model to predict poor pain-related quality of life after endometriosis surgery. Registry data from a prospective longitudinal cohort at a tertiary referral center (2013-2020) was used for model development and validation. Participants underwent an index endometriosis surgery, and completed the pain subscale of the Endometriosis Health Profile-30 (EHP-30) at baseline and 1-2-year follow-up. The outcome was poor pain-related quality of life defined as EHP-30 pain subscale above the 75th percentile for North America, at 1 to 2 years postsurgery. Thirty-two preoperative factors were evaluated, with final models retaining the top 10 most important predictors. Elastic net logistic regression, random forest (RF) and multilayer perceptron neural network models were developed. Internal validation was performed using 500 bootstrap samples, and a held-out test cohort. The study included 650 488 in the training cohort and 162 in a held-out test cohort. The RF model exhibited the most consistent discrimination, measured by the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve, between the training cohort (0.768; 95% CI: 0.690-0.837) and test cohort (0.766; 95% CI: 0.676-0.863, Δ = -0.002). The RF model also demonstrated the best integrated calibration index (0.029) and highest net benefit. Final preoperative predictors for the RF model included baseline EHP-30 score, surgery type (conservative fertility-sparing vs hysterectomy), anxiety scores, depression scores, pain catastrophizing scale scores, abdominal wall pain, pelvic floor myalgia, smoking status, back pain, and race/ethnicity. We present the RF model as the Endometriosis Pain Index to aid preoperative counselling for endometriosis surgery.
Executive Summary of the Vulvodynia Therapeutic Research Summit
Krapf JM et al., 2026 · Obstetrics and gynecology
The current treatment of provoked vestibulodynia involving neuroproliferation is often complete vestibulectomy; however, less invasive treatments are biologically plausible, yet lack study. The International Society for the Study of Women's Sexual Health, the National Vulvodynia Association, the Gynecologic Cancers Research Foundation, and Tight Lipped, a grassroots nonprofit organization that supports people with chronic vulvovaginal and pelvic pain, collectively sponsored a conference, the Vulvodynia Therapeutic Research Summit, held in April 2024. The primary objective of the Vulvodynia Therapeutic Research Summit was to identify options for further research of the treatment of provoked vestibulodynia through expert consensus. After the conference, attendees scored the presented therapeutics in rank order, leading to a hierarchy of merit. Fifteen therapeutic options were presented and ranked in order of most promising to least promising for further study on treating the neuroinflammation of provoked vestibulodynia. The top identified therapeutics for further research were: 1) ketotifen fumarate (mast cell stabilizer with potential to prevent mast cell activation), 2) resiniferatoxin (transient receptor vanilloid 1 agonist causing chemo-inactivation of nerve terminals), 3) specialized pro-resolving mediators or strategies to boost their levels (eg, maresin 1 and 1-trifluoromethoxy-phenyl-3-[1-propionylpiperidin-4-yl] urea), 4) luteolin (flavonoid with potent anti-inflammatory, antioxidant, and neuroprotective properties), 5) alpha-lipoic acid (antioxidant with nerve-specific anti-inflammatory and mast cell stabilizing qualities), and 6) NGFR121W -SNAP IR700 trimer exposed to near-infared light (photoablation targeting nociceptors and sparing surrounding tissue). This executive summary describes the rationale for identifying specific pharmacologic agents and medical devices as targets for research directed toward treatment of the neuroinflammatory process found in the vestibular mucosa of provoked vestibulodynia.
Factors Affecting Hormonal Therapy Ineffectiveness and Discontinuation due to Adverse Effects in Patients with Endometriosis-Associated Pain
Fayek B et al., 2025 · Reproductive sciences (Thousand Oaks, Calif.)
Endometriosis contributes to 5-21% of hospital admissions for pelvic pain. While hormonal therapies are pivotal in managing endometriosis-related pain, no single hormonal treatment suits all patients. We aimed to assess the effectiveness and tolerability of hormonal therapies and factors influencing response in endometriosis-associated pain treatment. Additionally, to investigate adjuvant neuromodulatory drug usage in patients who have used hormonal therapy. This cross-sectional study examined endometriosis patients undergoing hormonal therapy for pelvic pain at a tertiary referral centre for endometriosis and chronic pelvic pain (CPP). We assessed the proportion of patients reporting ineffectiveness of hormonal therapy and rates of discontinuation attributed to side effects. We evaluated factors related to treatment ineffectiveness and discontinuation due to side effects. Lastly, we determined the rates of adjuvant neuromodulatory drug use among patients who used hormonal therapy. 1011 patients were included in the study. Most hormonal therapies' ineffectiveness was related to worse CPP (P < .05). Cul-de-sac obliteration was correlated with better response to cyclic CHCs, DNG, and GnRH agonist (OR = 0.55, 95% CI [0.36 - 0.84]; OR = 0.53, 95% CI [0.29 - 0.98]; OR = 0.26, 95% CI [0.14 - 0.91], respectively). Adjuvant neuromodulatory drugs were more frequently utilized by patients who found hormone therapy ineffective except for those who used norethisterone acetate (NETA). Endometriosis pain is associated with a high chance of failed hormonal therapy. Cul-de-sac obliteration correlated with improved hormonal therapy response, highlighting the multifactorial influence on treatment outcomes. Patients who found hormone therapy ineffective tended to use adjuvant neuromodulatory drugs more frequently.
Endometriosis Clinical and Surgical Care During the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Comparison of Virtual-Only Care to Virtual and In-Person Care Combined
Goodwin E et al., 2025 · Journal of minimally invasive gynecology · Free to read
Endometriosis is a chronic and inflammatory condition that affects approximately 10% of the reproductive-age population. During the COVID-19 pandemic, there was a shift towards virtual care for endometriosis. Our aim was to evaluate the diagnostic and treatment outcomes of virtual-only care, compared to those who had both virtual and in-person visits. Retrospective descriptive analysis of registry data. This study was conducted in British Columbia, Canada, at a tertiary referral center for endometriosis and pelvic pain. In this cohort (n = 389), we examined patients who received an initial virtual assessment followed by virtual care alone (Virtual Only group, n = 203) and those who had an initial virtual assessment followed by an in-person physical exam (Physical Exam group, n = 186). Virtual care at the center during the COVID-19 pandemic. The Physical Exam group was more likely to have surgery compared to the Virtual Only group (45.7% vs. 16%, p <.001). At the time of surgery, the groups did not differ based on type of surgery (e.g., excision of endometriosis and/or hysterectomy), endometriosis anatomic findings (e.g., stage and anatomic subtype), surgical complexity or surgical complications. At baseline, the two groups did not differ in their pain, mental health or quality of life scores. At 1-year follow-up, the two groups did not differ in these outcome measures. There was a lower rate of surgery, but no differences in surgical findings or complications, nor in 1-year outcomes, after virtual only care for endometriosis compared to patients that had a virtual visit and then underwent a physical exam. These results support a hybrid model, where a virtual visit is the first contact and serves as a triage tool to determine whether a patient is appropriate for virtual only care or would benefit from a physical exam. Future research could incorporate population-based administrative data or qualitative approaches to understanding patient experiences and physician perspectives on virtual care for the treatment of endometriosis.
Related research
Risk factors associated with endometriosis: importance of study population for characterizing disease in the ENDO Study
Peterson CM et al., 2013 · Am J Obstet Gynecol · Free full text on PubMed Central
We sought to identify risk factors for endometriosis and their consistency across study populations in the Endometriosis: Natural History, Diagnosis, and Outcomes (ENDO) Study. In this prospective matched, exposure cohort design, 495 women aged 18-44 years undergoing pelvic surgery (exposed to surgery, operative cohort) were compared to an ageand residence-matched population cohort of 131 women (unexposed to surgery, population cohort). Endometriosis was diagnosed visually at laparoscopy/laparotomy or by pelvic magnetic resonance imaging in the operative and population cohorts, respectively. Logistic regression estimated the adjusted odds ratios (AORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for each cohort. The incidence of visualized endometriosis was 40% in the operative cohort (11.8% stage 3-4 by revised criteria from the American Society for Reproductive Medicine), and 11% stage 3-4 in the population cohort by magnetic resonance imaging. An infertility history increased the odds of an endometriosis diagnosis in both the operative (AOR, 2.43; 95% CI, 1.57-3.76) and population (AOR, 7.91; 95% CI, 1.69-37.2) cohorts. In the operative cohort only, dysmenorrhea (AOR, 2.46; 95% CI, 1.28-4.72) and pelvic pain (AOR, 3.67; 95% CI, 2.44-5.50) increased the odds of diagnosis, while gravidity (AOR, 0.49; 95% CI, 0.32-0.75), parity (AOR, 0.42; 95% CI, 0.28-0.64), and body mass index (AOR, 0.95; 95% CI, 0.93-0.98) decreased the odds of diagnosis. In all sensitivity analyses for different diagnostic subgroups, infertility history remained a strong risk factor. An infertility history was a consistent risk factor for endometriosis in both the operative and population cohorts of the ENDO Study. Additionally, identified risk factors for endometriosis vary based upon cohort selection and diagnostic accuracy. Finally, endometriosis in the population may be more common than recognized.
Is endometriosis typology a potentially better classification system for assessing risk of female infertility?
Schliep KC et al., 2025 · F S Rep · Free full text on PubMed Central
To determine whether endometriosis typology, namely ovarian endometriomas (OE), deep infiltrating endometriosis (DIE), or superficial endometriosis (SE), correlates with fertility history. Prospective cohort. One of fourteen surgical centers in Salt Lake City, Utah (n = 5) or San Francisco, California (n = 9). A total of 473 women (18-44 years) with no prior endometriosis diagnosis, undergoing laparoscopies/laparotomies, irrespective of indication, in Utah or California (2007-2009). Exposure: Incident endometriosis. Before surgery, we queried women about time to become pregnant for prior planned pregnancies. Generalized linear models were used to calculate adjusted prevalence ratios (aPR) for association between endometriosis typology and infertility, defined as having ever tried >12 months (>6 months for women ≥35 years) to get pregnant. We also generated fecundability odds ratios (aFOR) to capture time to pregnancy. Twenty-five percent (n = 116) of women were diagnosed with SE only, 5% (n = 23) with OE, 6% (n = 29) with DIE, and 5% (n = 22) with OE + DIE, and 60% (n = 283) with no endometriosis. Compared with women with no endometriosis, women with SE had a 1.58 higher aPR (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.16-2.14), although women with OE and/or DIE had a 2.41 higher aPR for subfertility after adjusting for women's age, body mass index, and site. Compared with women with no endometriosis, women with OE and/or DIE had a 53% lower historic fecundability (aFOR, 0.47; 95% CI, 0.24-0.95); however, no association was found among women with SE (aFOR, 0.81; 95% CI, 0.49-1.33). Specific endometriosis typologies may be associated with fecundability, with OE and/or DIE associated with nearly a 150% higher prevalence of subfertility and over a 50% lower historic fecundability.
Women's Reproductive History Before the Diagnosis of Incident Endometriosis
Buck Louis GM et al., 2016 · J Womens Health (Larchmt) · Free full text on PubMed Central
Endometriosis is a gynecologic disease reported to be associated with infertility and, possibly, adverse pregnancy outcomes. While considerable research focuses on pregnancy outcomes following diagnosis and/or treatment, few data actually describe women's reproductive history before diagnosis for a more complete understanding of endometriosis and reproduction. The study sample comprised 473 women (aged 18-44 years) undergoing laparoscopies or laparotomies, irrespective of surgical indication at 14 clinical sites, during the period 2007-2009. Upon enrollment and before surgery, women were queried about pregnancy intentions and the time required to become pregnant for planned pregnancies. Endometriosis was defined as surgically visualized disease. Using discrete time survival analysis, we estimated fecundability odds ratios (FORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) to assess time to pregnancy (TTP) after adjusting for potential confounders (age, body composition, cigarette smoking, site). Generalized estimating equations accounted for multiple pregnancy attempts per woman. FORs ResultsApproximately 66% and 69% of women with and without endometriosis, respectively, reported having a planned pregnancy before surgery, respectively. After adjustment, an endometriosis diagnosis was associated with ≈29% reduction in fecundity or a longer TTP across all pregnancy-trying attempts (adjusted FOR = 0.71; 95% CI 0.46-1.10). While FORs were consistently ConclusionsWomen with endometriosis had a longer TTP than unaffected women, irrespective of disease severity, although the findings did not achieve significance. Prior reproductive history may be informative for predicting fecundity and pregnancy outcomes following diagnosis/treatment.
Diagnostic laparoscopy in infertile women with normal hysterosalpingograms
al-Badawi IA et al., 1999 · J Reprod Med
To assess the value of laparoscopy in infertile women with normal hysterosalpingograms, with and without risk factors suggesting pelvic disease. We retrospectively reviewed 1,022 consecutive charts from a tertiary infertility practice. In 265 women, laparoscopies were performed after normal hysterosalpingograms. Laparoscopies were normal in 136 (51%) women, whereas 129 (49%) had one or more abnormal laparoscopic findings, including minimal or mild endometriosis (n = 85), moderate or severe endometriosis (n = 11), adnexal adhesions (n = 27), subserosal myomas (n = 17), ovarian neoplasms (n = 5), distal phimosis (n = 1) and salpingitis isthmica nodosa (n = 1). Only 7% of cases had findings that might require standard operative laparoscopy or laparotomy, although not all were causally related to infertility. A history of dysmenorrhea or dyspareunia increased the likelihood of detecting endometriosis from 41% to 64% and 69%, respectively. The presence of both symptoms increased the likelihood to 83%. In the presence of a normal hysterosalpingogram, laparoscopy identified other pelvic disease in about half of patients. Because most abnormalities were mild, this knowledge can be used to plan a micro-laparoscopic approach for many women, reserving traditional or operative laparoscopy for women with an abnormal hysterosalpingogram or extensive disease following micro-laparoscopy. Alternately, knowledge of the nature and severity of the expected laparoscopic findings might lead to bypassing laparoscopy in favor of assisted reproduction when the perceived benefit of surgical intervention is small.