Fertility Awareness Effectiveness

Continued use of the Standard Days Method

Sinai I, Lundgren RI, Gribble JN

Published July 2012 The journal of family planning and reproductive health care
DOI 10.1136/jfprhc-2011-100097 PMID 21857029

Abstract

Objective

To examine the long-term effectiveness and continuation of the Standard Days Method (SDM)®, a fertility awareness-based method of family planning that identifies Days 8-19 (inclusive) of the cycle as the fertile window. On these days users avoid unprotected sexual intercourse to prevent pregnancy. The method works best for women with cycles that are usually in the range of 26-32 days, which is an important reason for method discontinuation in the first year of use. The authors determine if this continues to be an issue in the second and third years of method use.

Methods

Participants in an earlier efficacy study (478 women in three countries) and method introduction studies (1181 women in four countries) were followed for 2 years beyond the original 1-year study period, to determine their continued use of the method, intended and unintended pregnancies, and reasons for discontinuation. Life-tables were used to approximate typical use pregnancy rates.

Results

The method continues to be effective in the second and third years of use, and compares favourably to other user-directed family planning methods. Women with no more than two cycles outside the 26-32-day range within a year are likely to continue having cycles within this range.

Conclusions

Women who complete the first year of SDM use are likely to continue to be able to use the method successfully and effectively. The method presents a viable longer-term option for women who prefer this approach to family planning.

Read the guide

Topics

By this author

Related research

Fertility Awareness › Effectiveness › Typical and Perfect Use
Irit Sinai, Rebecka I Lundgren, James N Gribble
I Sinai, R Lundgren, Jim Gribble, Jimmy Gribble, J Gribble
PMID 21857029 21857029 DOI 10.1136/jfprhc-2011-100097 10.1136/jfprhc-2011-100097 Sinai et al. 2012, Sinai 2012