Longevity and Reproductive Aging Reproductive Aging

Executive summary of the Stages of Reproductive Aging Workshop +10: addressing the unfinished agenda of staging reproductive aging

Harlow SD, Gass M, Hall JE, Lobo R, Maki P, Rebar RW, Sherman S, Sluss PM, de Villiers TJ, STRAW+10 Collaborative Group

Published April 2012 Climacteric : the journal of the International Menopause Society
DOI 10.3109/13697137.2011.650656 PMID 22338612 PMC PMC3580996

Abstract

Objective

The aim of this article is to summarize the recommended updates to the 2001 Stages of Reproductive Aging Workshop (STRAW) criteria. The 2011 STRAW +10 reviewed advances in understanding of the critical changes in hypothalamic-pituitary-ovarian function that occur before and after the final menstrual period.

Methods

Scientists from five countries and multiple disciplines evaluated data from cohort studies of midlife women and in the context of chronic illness and endocrine disorders on change in menstrual, endocrine, and ovarian markers of reproductive aging including antimüllerian hormone, inhibin-B, follicle-stimulating hormone, and antral follicle count. Modifications were adopted by consensus.

Results

STRAW +10 simplified bleeding criteria for the early and late menopausal transition, recommended modifications to criteria for the late reproductive stage (Stage -3) and the early postmenopause stage (Stage +1), provided information on the duration of the late transition (Stage -1) and early postmenopause (Stage +1), and recommended application regardless of women's age, ethnicity, body size, or lifestyle characteristics.

Conclusions

STRAW +10 provides a more comprehensive basis for assessing reproductive aging in research and clinical contexts. Application of the STRAW +10 staging system should improve comparability of studies of midlife women and facilitate clinical decision making. Nonetheless, important knowledge gaps persist, and seven research priorities are identified.

Topics

By this author

Related research

Longevity and Reproductive Aging › Reproductive Aging › Staging the Transition · Clinical Guidelines and Standards › Diagnostic Criteria and Classification › Staging and Classification Systems · Research Methods › Evidence Synthesis › Systematic Reviews
Margery Gass, Pauline Maki, Patrick M Sluss, Tobie J de Villiers
M Gass, P Maki, Pat Sluss, P Sluss, T Villiers
PMID 22338612 22338612 DOI 10.3109/13697137.2011.650656 10.3109/13697137.2011.650656 Harlow et al. 2012, Harlow 2012