A personal professional journey: the real history of restorative and responsible reproductive medicine

Rebar RW

Published December 2025 Fertility and sterility, 124(6), 1189-1190
DOI 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2025.09.015 PMID 41352767

RRM Academy Synopsis

Rebar calls restorative reproductive medicine outmoded for infertility

Rebar argues restorative reproductive medicine steps back to 1960s and 1970s infertility practice. His 2025 personal essay in Fertility and Sterility draws on a career that includes a fellowship from 1974 to 1976. The author, an IVF doctor (a reproductive endocrinologist), holds that specialists in his field already evaluate both partners.

Key Findings

  • Rebar writes that proponents concentrate only or largely on the female, give undue weight to endometriosis, fertility awareness approaches and lifestyle changes, and may postpone pregnancy needlessly.
  • The essay reports that surgery for endometriosis or adhesions inside the abdomen in the late 1970s and early 1980s, before IVF became widespread, led to pregnancy in only approximately 25% of women.
  • Approximately half of women with unexplained infertility eventually have an infant without treatment, and a continuing attempt to conceive ends in a child for approximately 70% of women with recurrent miscarriages.
  • The essay states that IVF shortens the time to pregnancy, citing two ASRM Practice Committee documents, and calls this especially true in unexplained infertility and important for older women.
  • Rebar states that board-certified IVF doctors receive training in the diagnosis and care of the full range of reproductive disorders and infertility, and he calls their practice responsible restorative reproductive medicine.

Interpretation

The piece is a personal column in Fertility and Sterility. Its conclusions rest on the author's reading of about 50 years of collective history in the field and on his own clinical experience. Several outcome figures cite a Merck Manual chapter, and the statement about IVF cites two society documents. The essay reports no cohort and no comparison of IVF with restorative care. Rebar views the term as nonmedical and used in a misleading manner.

RRM Context

Restorative reproductive medicine evaluates both partners. The approach seeks the underlying cause of reduced fertility and treats that cause. Cycle charting gives the clinician a record of each cycle's fertile signs. Many cases labeled unexplained infertility are undiagnosed, and the field works to find the diagnosis.

Abstract not indexed.

By this author

Related research

PMID 41352767 41352767 DOI 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2025.09.015 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2025.09.015 Rebar et al. 2025, Rebar 2025