Men banking semen for infertility used it more than men with cancer
Among 7044 men who banked semen at one Italian center from 1991 to 2023, men with male factor infertility picked up their samples far more often than men with cancer. About 4 in 10 men with male factor infertility picked up their semen. Fewer than 1 in 10 men with cancer did. Pick-up was lowest in the youngest men.
Key Findings
Of 7044 men who banked semen between November 1991 and November 2023, 3400 (48.27%) had male factor infertility and 3262 (46.31%) had cancer.
Pick-up rates were 42.15% (1433/3400) for male factor infertility, 8.55% (279/3262) for cancer and 15.45% (59/382) for other reasons.
Pick-up was highest in men aged 35 to 40 at freezing (36.05%) and lowest in men under 20 (1.98%).
A total of 18.1% (1277/7044) chose to have samples destroyed: 20.4% (665/3262) with cancer and 14.9% (506/3400) with male factor infertility.
Interpretation
The registry belongs to one tertiary center in Padua, Italy, and looks back at men who froze semen from 1991 to 2023. Such data show associations between the reason for freezing, age and pick-up. Follow-up semen analyses, hormone results and pregnancy outcomes were not collected, and pre-pubertal patients are missing. The authors say the data may suggest that several men with cancer regained natural fertility and chose to discard samples. They conclude that indication, age and collection method might help predict later use.
RRM Context
The authors advise counseling on freezing only after a full workup for treatable causes of male factor infertility. The goal is to lower the share labeled unexplained. Restorative reproductive medicine shares the principle: evaluate the man first, as part of the couple.
Our editorial summary of this paper, not the article's abstract.
Abstract
Background and Objectives
Semen cryopreservation has been widely used in recent decades, mainly in patients with male factor infertility (MFI) and patients with cancer (to preserve their fertility potential before undergoing gonadotoxic treatments, such as chemotherapy or radiotherapy).
Methods
we evaluated the temporal trend and the existence of factors determining the usage of cryopreserved semen (in order, for instance, to conceive using assisted reproduction techniques (ARTs)). We evaluated 7044 patients who cryopreserved since 1991, evaluating clinical information such as the diagnosis, age, the method with which the collection took place and the number of pick-ups for use in ART.
Results
The mean age of the patients was 33.12 ± 8.41 years. The most common cancers were testicular (1758/3262) and hematological cancers (942/3262). Patients who underwent cryopreservation for MFI picked up their samples much more than neoplastic patients (42.15% vs. 8.55%). Patients 35-40 years old picked up their samples more frequently when compared with other age groups. Moreover, we found several data regarding the sub-types of cancers and the methods of semen collection.
Conclusions
According to our results, the indication for semen cryopreservation, age and the method of collection might represent a simple way to predict the future use of semen for ART.
Grande G et al., 2026·The Journal of clinical endocrinology and metabolism·Free to read
Male factor infertility (MFI) is frequently labelled idiopathic when evaluation relies primarily on semen analysis, potentially overlooking endocrine and pathophysiological mechanisms relevant for targeted management.
To phenotypically define MFI and develop a pathophysiology-based classification aimed at reducing idiopathic infertility following comprehensive evaluation.
Prospective monocentric cohort study conducted at a tertiary referral academic centre.
Eight hundred male partners of infertile couples evaluated between October 2024 and January 2026 after exclusion of isolated female factor infertility.
Prevalence of MFI categories, hormonal patterns across phenotypes, and proportion of idiopathic infertility after comprehensive work-up.
All patients underwent standardized clinical evaluation, hormonal assessment (total testosterone, FSH, LH), testicular ultrasound, and complete semen analysis. Microbiological testing, transrectal ultrasound, and genetic analyses were performed according to guidelines.
Primary spermatogenic failure was the most prevalent category (56.0%), followed by infection/inflammation (22.4%) and hypogonadotropic hypogonadism (8.5%). Idiopathic infertility was identified in only 5.3% of cases. Distinct endocrine profiles were observed, with high-FSH spermatogenic failure representing the dominant phenotype.
Comprehensive phenotyping markedly reduces the proportion of patients classified as having idiopathic infertility and identifies clinically relevant subgroups. This prospective study provides validation of a pathophysiology-based classification and supports a shift toward endocrine-integrated diagnostic strategies in male infertility, with potential implications for targeted management.
Rocca MS et al., 2026·Journal of translational medicine·Free to read
Standard semen analysis has little prognostic value in distinguishing fertile from infertile men. Furthermore, in men with semen parameters within the reference ranges, it cannot distinguish fertile men from infertile men, i.e. partners of couples with idiopathic infertility. Oxidative stress, mitochondrial dysfunction, sperm telomere shortening, and DNA fragmentation have been proposed as contributors to impaired male fertility. However, these biomarkers have not been evaluated as a whole in subjects with normal semen parameters, partners of fertile and infertile couples.
To characterise a multidimensional panel of sperm biomarkers-including sperm telomere length (STL), mitochondrial DNA copy number (mtDNAcn), reactive oxygen species (ROS), lipid peroxidation (LP), sperm chromatin dispersion (SCD), and respiratory control ratio (RCR)-and to identify whether these parameters might discriminate, in men with normal semen parameters, infertile men from fertile controls.
A total of 150 men with semen parameters within the normal ranges were enrolled: 47 male partners of couples with idiopathic infertility and 103 fertile controls. STL and mtDNAcn were quantified by qPCR; ROS were assessed using OxiSperm®II with semiquantitative imaging; LP was measured spectrophotometrically in seminal plasma; SCD was used to determine DNA fragmentation; and mitochondrial function was evaluated by oxygen consumption and RCR. Correlations between biomarkers and semen parameters were analysed using Pearson or Spearman coefficients, and intergroup comparisons were adjusted for age.
Semen parameters did not differ significantly between male partners of fertile and infertile couples. compared to men of fertile couples, men of infertile couples exhibited significantly shorter STL (0.57 ± 0.59 vs 1.21 ± 1.13, p_adj = 0.001) and higher oxidative stress, with both ROS (8300.9 ± 4214.8 vs 6555.3 ± 3394.3, p_adj = 0.027) and LP (88.33 ± 55.50 vs 40.29 ± 46.98, p_adj < 0.001) markedly elevated. mtDNAcn, SCD, and RCR showed no difference between the groups. Across the entire cohort, STL correlated negatively with ROS and LP and positively with RCR. ROS correlated negatively with total sperm count, motility and RCR, and positively with LP. LP displayed the strongest pattern of associations, correlating negatively with concentration, total count, motility, STL and RCR, and positively with age and volume.
Among men with normal semen analysis, partners of couples with idiopathic infertility exhibit a distinct sperm molecular profile characterised by telomere shortening and oxidative imbalance. STL, ROS and LP emerged as age-independent biomarkers associated with infertility status and showed promising discriminatory ability in this cohort, supporting their integration as second-level tests to complement routine semen analysis in cases of normozoospermia.
Ponce MR et al., 2026·Andrology·Free full text on PubMed Central
Transgender individuals assigned male at birth (AMAB) may choose to preserve their fertility prior to starting gender-affirming hormone therapy (GAHT). However, limited data exist regarding the baseline reproductive and hormonal characteristics of this population before and after GAHT.
To characterize semen quality and hormonal profiles in transgender AMAB individuals prior to GAHT and compare findings with cisgender men and with transgender individuals who discontinued GAHT for at least 3 months.
This retrospective study included transgender AMAB individuals from two tertiary andrology centers who underwent sperm cryopreservation before GAHT initiation (treatment-naïve group). Clinical evaluation included anthropometric measures, testicular volume assessment, varicocele detection, and sex hormone measures. Semen parameters were analyzed according to WHO criteria and compared with those of cisgender men and previously treated transgender individuals.
Thirty-two treatment-naïve transgender AMAB individuals were included. Hormonal parameters were generally within reference ranges. Only 46.9% of treatment-naïve individuals met WHO criteria for normozoospermia, compared with 75.5% of cisgender controls. Compared with nine previously treated individuals, estradiol levels were higher and seminal volume lower. A higher frequency of seminal abnormalities was observed, although not statistically significant.
A substantial proportion of treatment-naïve transgender AMAB individuals exhibited impaired semen parameters prior to GAHT initiation. Prior GAHT exposure showed a trend toward poorer semen quality. These findings support early fertility counseling and preservation in transgender individuals prior to GAHT initiation.
Besides gonadal involvement (hypogonadism, male factor infertility, and testicular hypotrophy), patients with Klinefelter syndrome (KS) may suffer from several extra-gonadic complications, including neoplastic events.
The aim of this review is to summarize all major clinical evidence dealing with the association between KS and neoplastic diseases and provide practical suggestions for the management of patients with KS regarding neoplastic risk.
This narrative review was conducted through a comprehensive search of the PubMed database, using combinations of the following keywords: "Klinefelter syndrome," "cancer," "neoplasm," "breast cancer," "germ cell tumor," "lymphoma," and "testosterone replacement therapy".
KS is associated with a higher risk of breast cancer and mediastinal germ cell tumors and an apparent higher risk of hematological malignancies, in particular non-Hodgkin lymphoma and leukemia. Evidence on testicular cancer is limited, with no clear increase in risk attributable to KS, while prostate cancer has a lower risk and lower mortality rate.
Given the complexity of the syndrome and the limited available evidence, regular clinical follow-up with targeted investigations when clinically indicated may facilitate early diagnosis and management of associated comorbidities.
van Casteren NJ et al., 2008·Fertility and sterility
To assess the use rate and assisted reproductive technologies (ART) outcome of the cryopreserved semen of cancer patients with an average follow-up of 7 years (range, 2-23 years). Retrospective data analysis. University-affiliated andrology and reproduction center. Six hundred twenty-nine male cancer patients who were referred for semen cryopreservation between 1983 and 2004. Review of patient characteristics and ART outcome. Use rate and live births using cryopreserved semen. A total of 749 semen samples from 557 men were preserved. Ninety-one patients died during follow-up, and another 29 requested disposal. Forty-two patients requested the use of their banked semen. ART data were available for 37 patients. A total of 101 ART cycles (32 IVF, 53 intracytoplasmic sperm injection [ICSIs], nine cryo-ET, and seven intrauterine inseminations [IUIs]) were performed, resulting in, respectively, 8, 16, 2, and 1 pregnancies. Pregnancies rates for IVF and ICSI were significantly higher than those for IUI. So far, 7.5% of the cancer survivors have used their banked semen, which led to live births in 49% of the couples. Semen cryopreservation is a reliable method to preserve fertility potential and gives couples a reasonable chance of achieving parenthood.
Lackamp N et al., 2021·Frontiers in oncology·Free full text on PubMed Central
Progress in oncological treatment has led to an improved long-term survival of young male cancer patients over the last decades. However, standard cancer treatments frequently implicate fertility-damaging potential. Cryopreservation of sperm is the current standard option to preserve patient's fertility after treatment, yet long-term data on usage and reproductive experiences is still limited. Natural fertility after treatment and especially in relation to the type of treatment has been poorly analyzed so far. Therefore, we performed a retrospective survey including male patients with an indication for gonadotoxic treatment who cryopreserved reproductive material at our institution between 1994 and 2017. Study questionnaires regarding treatment, material usage, and reproductive outcomes were sent to eligible patients. Additionally, semen analyses of study participants from the time of cryopreservation were evaluated. A total of 99 patients were included in the study. Respondents' median age was 38.0 years. Most frequent diagnoses were testicular cancer (29.3%) and lymphoma (26.3%). A further 8.1% suffered from autoimmune diseases. Testicular cancer patients had a significantly lower pre-treatment median sperm concentration (18.0 million/ml) compared to non-testicular cancer patients (54.2 million/ml). Until November 2020, the determined sperm usage and cumulative live-birth rate per couple were 17.2% and 58.8%, respectively. Most sperm users received treatments with high (40.0%) or intermediate (33.3%) gonadotoxic potential. 20.7% of all patients reported to had fathered at least one naturally conceived child after treatment, this being the case especially if they had been treated with less or potentially gonadotoxic therapies. In conclusion, our findings emphasize the importance of sperm cryopreservation in the context of male fertility preservation. Furthermore, they indicate that the gonadotoxic potential of patients' treatments could represent a predictive factor for sperm usage.
Li Q et al., 2024·Human reproduction open·Free full text on PubMed Central
Does sperm cryopreservation serve as a feasible and effective method for preserving fertility in adult male patients with cancer? Sperm cryopreservation is an effective fertility preservation method and may benefit patients with cancer. Sperm cryopreservation is the only way to efficiently preserve male fertility. It is an important procedure in ART. Recently, due to remarkable advances in cancer treatment, an increasing number of studies have reported the outcomes of sperm cryopreservation in patients with cancer. We conducted an extensive literature search for relevant studies published through to 31 December 2021, in the following databases: CENTRAL, CNKI, Cochrane Systematic Reviews, EMBASE, MEDLINE, PUBMED, and Web of Science. The search terms used were '(cryopreservation OR freeze OR freezing OR banking OR cryostorage OR storage) AND (sperm OR semen OR spermatozoon) AND (cancer OR tumor OR malignancy OR neoplasm)'. We included all studies that reported offering or attempting to cryopreserve sperm before or during cancer treatment in male patients considered at risk of treatment-related fertility impairment. We evaluated the eligibility of all data in each study. The major exclusion criteria were as follows: non-cancer patients; pediatric and adolescent cancer patients; not reporting the use of cryopreserved sperm; use of fresh semen for ART; not reporting the number of patients with cancer offered sperm cryopreservation or attempting to do so before or during treatment; using an experimental fertility preservation technique such as preservation of testicular tissue or spermatogonial stem cells; duplicate data; abstracts, case report, comments, reviews, or editorials; insufficient data reported. The quality of the included studies was assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa scale and the Methodological Index for Non-Randomized Studies. This meta-analysis included 69 non-randomized studies, with 32 234 patients referred for sperm analysis and 23 178 patients cryopreserving at least one sperm sample. The pooled failed-to-cryopreserve rate was 10% (95% CI, 8-12%), and the sperm disposal and sperm use rates were 23% (95% CI, 16-30%) and 9% (95% CI, 8-10%), respectively. The pregnancy, miscarriage, and delivery rates were 28% (95% CI, 22-33%), 13% (95% CI, 10-17%), and 20% (95% CI, 15-25%), respectively. Subgroup analysis showed higher pregnancy and delivery rates, as well as a lower failed-to-cryopreserve rate, in recent studies compared to those released a decade ago. The studies from Asia reported higher sperm disposal and pregnancy rates than in other continents. Our analysis showed clinical pregnancy rates per cycle of 34% (27-41%), 24% (14-35%), and 9% (5-15%) and delivery rates per cycle of 23% (17-30%), 18% (11-26%), and 5% (1-9%) for ICSI, IVF, and IUI, respectively. As with all meta-analyses, some limitations should be considered. The first limitation of our study is that the data span 36 years. During this time, the World Health Organization has revised its sperm analysis standards, and other important changes have been made. There is also a limitation in that the outcome does not analyze the correlation between the type of cancer and sperm quality. Many of the earlier studies were limited by small sample sizes and a lack of control groups. Furthermore, almost all studies did not consider the severity of the disease, which could potentially have a substantial impact on the results. Consequently, further research should evaluate the effect of the type of cancer and, in particular, the severity of the condition on sperm quality in order to draw more precise conclusions. Similarly, it is inappropriate that most studies failed to differentiate between patients with different types of tumors and instead drew generalized conclusions that are presumed to apply to all patients with cancer. In the present analysis, we did not have in-depth information on patients' disease, and although extensive efforts were made to conduct a thorough systematic review and meta-analysis of the outcomes for patients with various types of tumors, the results must be acknowledged as being subject to bias. However, the use of average results obtained in each study, without the patient-level data, might also represent a source of bias. Sperm cryopreservation is an effective fertility preservation method and may benefit patients with cancer. The observed utilization rate of frozen sperm at 9% may underestimate the actual usage, as the short follow-up period is inadequate for obtaining comprehensive data on the use of frozen sperm in young cancer survivors. ART plays an important role in fertility preservation and the achievement of pregnancy, with this meta-analysis showing that ICSI delivers better clinical outcomes than IVF or IUI in patients with cancer undergoing fertility preservation. This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (grant no. 82001634, 81960550), and the China Post
Weibring K et al., 2024·Frontiers in endocrinology·Free full text on PubMed Central
The possibility of future parenthood is a highly relevant issue for patients of reproductive age facing oncologic treatment. This study aimed to investigate how fatherhood was achieved in a patient cohort of adolescents and young adults (AYAs) banking semen at time of cancer diagnosis and to determine the effectiveness of cryopreservation aimed at fertility preservation in the cohort. Observational cohort study examining AYAs with a cancer diagnosis who underwent semen banking for fertility preservation at Karolinska University Hospital 1988-2020, as part of the Stockholm regional fertility preservation program. This cohort is being prospectively followed since time of referral to the program, with most individuals included when presenting with primary cancers (Study Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NTC04602962). Individuals achieving adulthood in the cohort were followed-up regarding their reproductive outcomes by linking to the Swedish Multi-generation Register, to identify fatherhood through natural conception or adoption, and to the Swedish National Quality Registry for Assisted Reproduction to identify parenthood through medical assistance, including the use of own sperm either cryopreserved or fresh, or donor sperm. Of the 1,378 patients referred during the study period, 1,357 were eligible for fatherhood analysis (aged >20 years at the end of follow-up, December 31, 2021). In total, 493 men became fathers following cancer treatment: 399 (81%) did so naturally, 87 (18%) via assisted reproductive techniques (including two using donor sperm), and 7 (1%) through adoption. Of the 92 patients who used their cryopreserved sperm for assisted reproductive techniques, 34 (37%) successfully fathered a child. The patients may have had children prior to cryopreservation. A large proportion of AYA cancer survivors achieved fatherhood through natural conception in this cohort, whereas less than 1 in 5 survivors needed medical assistance to conceive. Although a low utilization rate of cryopreserved sperm was found in this cohort, its use was highly effective in the group that developed infertility. At present there are no standardized predictors of testicular toxicity after cancer treatment, and inter-individual variability is high. Further research is needed to identify patients at risk of infertility who would benefit from fertility preservation.
Male Fertility › Male Factor Treatment › Medical Management · Assisted Reproduction › Freezing and Storage › Egg Freezing
Donatella Sorio, Federica Finocchi, Sara Corrò, Nicola Passerin, Adriano Presciutti, A Di Mambro
D Sorio, F Finocchi, S Corrò, N Passerin, A Presciutti
PMID 40002282 40002282 DOI 10.3390/cancers17040689 10.3390/cancers17040689 Graziani et al. 2025, Graziani 2025
00240q980