Male Fertility · Male Factor Treatment
RRM Academy Synopsis
FSH improves sperm in only some men with unexplained infertility
A 2024 narrative review reports that FSH raised sperm counts and pregnancy rates in only some men with infertility of unknown cause. The authors estimate 10 to 18 men need treatment for one extra pregnancy. Hormone levels, testicular cells and genes have been proposed as predictors of response.
Key Findings
- Four meta-analyses cited in the review linked FSH treatment in men with unexplained infertility to higher pregnancy rates, less sperm DNA fragmentation and higher sperm concentrations.
- Among men with unexplained infertility, the number who must be treated to gain one more pregnancy is estimated at between 10 and 18.
- Non-responders may make up about 50% of men with normal pituitary hormone levels in plasma.
- According to the available data, a low baseline FSH level is the only biochemical parameter that might predict response. Studies so far have not suggested efficacy at higher baseline levels.
- Studies of FSHB and FSHR gene variants as response predictors gave conflicting results, so their clinical use remains unclear.
Interpretation
The paper calls itself a narrative review, and its authors write that the level of evidence is low. They name limits in the underlying studies: unstandardized FSH use, mixed patient groups and different treatment lengths. In men with unexplained infertility, the cited meta-analyses linked FSH to better sperm measures and pregnancy. Several studies on spermatid count, testicular cytology and gene variants come from the authors' own group. The post-genomic marker studies used rat and pig cells, and the authors say they still need translation to clinical practice.
RRM Context
The authors report that 20 to 50% of male infertility cases have no definite cause. They say the label "idiopathic" belongs only after a thorough diagnostic workup. Restorative reproductive medicine treats such cases as undiagnosed. Male factor infertility is present in 10 to 15% of couples worldwide, alone or with a female factor. A couple-centered workup evaluates both partners.
Abstract
Follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH) administration is applied in the management of subjects affected by hypogonadotropic hypogonadism. Whilst this application is widely recognized and established alone or in combination with human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG), a similar strategy is empirically advocated in idiopathic male factor infertility (MFI). In this setting, FSH therapy has been used to increase sperm quantity, quality, and pregnancy rate when FSH plasma concentrations are below 8 IU/L and when the seminal tract is not obstructed. In the literature, several studies suggested that giving FSH to patients with idiopathic MFI increases sperm count and motility, raising the overall pregnancy rate. However, this efficacy seems to be limited, and about 10-18 men should be treated to achieve one pregnancy. Thus, several papers suggest the need to move from a replacement approach to an overstimulating approach in the management of FSH therapy in idiopathic MFI. To this aim, it is imperative to determine some pharmacologic markers of FSH efficacy. Furthermore, it should be useful in clinical practice to distinguish, before starting the treatment, among patients who might respond or not to FSH treatment. Indeed, previous studies suggest that infertile men who have normal levels of gonadotropins in plasma might not respond to FSH treatment and about 50% of patients might be defined as "non-responders". For these reasons, identifying predictive markers of FSH action in spermatogenesis and clinical markers of response to FSH treatment is a fascinating area of study that might lead to new developments with the aim of achieving personalization of the treatment of male infertility. From this perspective, seminal parameters (i.e., spermatid count), testicular cytology, genetic assessment, and miRNA or protein markers in the future might be used to create a tailored FSH therapy plan. The personalization of FSH treatment is mandatory to minimize side effects, to avoid lost time with ineffective treatments, and to improve the efficacy, predicting the most efficient dose and the duration of the treatment. This narrative review's objective is to discuss the role of the different putative factors which have been proposed to predict the response to FSH treatment in idiopathic infertile men.