No open license is recorded for this paper. Reuse terms are set by the publisher.
Open Access
Free full text on PubMed Central (PMC6692875)
Abstract
Purpose
The testis-sparing surgery (TSS) is surgical technique accepted for small testicular masses (STMs). Frozen section examination (FSE) is an essential assessment at the time of TSS. The aim of this study is to measure the maximum distance of the foci of ITGCN from STMs.
Methods
In our hospital between June 2010 and October 2017 a total of 68 patients with STM underwent a TSS. All the testis specimens were totally embedded and processed via the whole-mount method and a diagnosis of germ cell tumor with GCNIS were made. The distance between STMs and GCNIS were calculated by two pathologists directly on the slides considering for the third dimension the number of the paraffin blocks in which the foci of GCNIS were found.
Results
The STMs were classic seminoma in 62 out 68 cases, embryonal carcinoma in 4 cases, while in 2 case a diagnose of mixed germ cell tumor were made. The size of the STMs was between 0.5 and 2 cm and the foci of GCNIS were observed in seminiferous tubules very closed to SMTs or as skip lesions in the surrounding testicular parenchyma, dispersed in normal testis. In 48 out of 68 cases (70.5%) foci of GCNIS were at the distance from SMTS of 1.5 cm or below and in 60 out of 68 cases (88%) at the distance of 2 cm or below The distance of GCNIS from the STMs was not related to the histological subtype of the germ cell tumor, while there is a linear correlation between size of the STMs and the distance of foci of GCNIS (p = 0.0105; r = 0.9167).
Conclusion
Our data showed that foci of ITGCN were not observed beyond 2.5 cm from the STM. In particular we demonstrated that exist a linear correlation between size of STMs and distance of the foci of GCNIS from STMs (p = 0.0105; r = 0.9167). In conclusion mapping the tissue around the tumor not randomly but in targeted areas could reduce the false negative biopsies of the testis with GCNIS, increasing the radicality of the TSS procedure.
Grande G et al., 2026·The Journal of clinical endocrinology and metabolism·Free to read
Male factor infertility (MFI) is frequently labelled idiopathic when evaluation relies primarily on semen analysis, potentially overlooking endocrine and pathophysiological mechanisms relevant for targeted management.
To phenotypically define MFI and develop a pathophysiology-based classification aimed at reducing idiopathic infertility following comprehensive evaluation.
Prospective monocentric cohort study conducted at a tertiary referral academic centre.
Eight hundred male partners of infertile couples evaluated between October 2024 and January 2026 after exclusion of isolated female factor infertility.
Prevalence of MFI categories, hormonal patterns across phenotypes, and proportion of idiopathic infertility after comprehensive work-up.
All patients underwent standardized clinical evaluation, hormonal assessment (total testosterone, FSH, LH), testicular ultrasound, and complete semen analysis. Microbiological testing, transrectal ultrasound, and genetic analyses were performed according to guidelines.
Primary spermatogenic failure was the most prevalent category (56.0%), followed by infection/inflammation (22.4%) and hypogonadotropic hypogonadism (8.5%). Idiopathic infertility was identified in only 5.3% of cases. Distinct endocrine profiles were observed, with high-FSH spermatogenic failure representing the dominant phenotype.
Comprehensive phenotyping markedly reduces the proportion of patients classified as having idiopathic infertility and identifies clinically relevant subgroups. This prospective study provides validation of a pathophysiology-based classification and supports a shift toward endocrine-integrated diagnostic strategies in male infertility, with potential implications for targeted management.
Rocca MS et al., 2026·Journal of translational medicine·Free to read
Standard semen analysis has little prognostic value in distinguishing fertile from infertile men. Furthermore, in men with semen parameters within the reference ranges, it cannot distinguish fertile men from infertile men, i.e. partners of couples with idiopathic infertility. Oxidative stress, mitochondrial dysfunction, sperm telomere shortening, and DNA fragmentation have been proposed as contributors to impaired male fertility. However, these biomarkers have not been evaluated as a whole in subjects with normal semen parameters, partners of fertile and infertile couples.
To characterise a multidimensional panel of sperm biomarkers-including sperm telomere length (STL), mitochondrial DNA copy number (mtDNAcn), reactive oxygen species (ROS), lipid peroxidation (LP), sperm chromatin dispersion (SCD), and respiratory control ratio (RCR)-and to identify whether these parameters might discriminate, in men with normal semen parameters, infertile men from fertile controls.
A total of 150 men with semen parameters within the normal ranges were enrolled: 47 male partners of couples with idiopathic infertility and 103 fertile controls. STL and mtDNAcn were quantified by qPCR; ROS were assessed using OxiSperm®II with semiquantitative imaging; LP was measured spectrophotometrically in seminal plasma; SCD was used to determine DNA fragmentation; and mitochondrial function was evaluated by oxygen consumption and RCR. Correlations between biomarkers and semen parameters were analysed using Pearson or Spearman coefficients, and intergroup comparisons were adjusted for age.
Semen parameters did not differ significantly between male partners of fertile and infertile couples. compared to men of fertile couples, men of infertile couples exhibited significantly shorter STL (0.57 ± 0.59 vs 1.21 ± 1.13, p_adj = 0.001) and higher oxidative stress, with both ROS (8300.9 ± 4214.8 vs 6555.3 ± 3394.3, p_adj = 0.027) and LP (88.33 ± 55.50 vs 40.29 ± 46.98, p_adj < 0.001) markedly elevated. mtDNAcn, SCD, and RCR showed no difference between the groups. Across the entire cohort, STL correlated negatively with ROS and LP and positively with RCR. ROS correlated negatively with total sperm count, motility and RCR, and positively with LP. LP displayed the strongest pattern of associations, correlating negatively with concentration, total count, motility, STL and RCR, and positively with age and volume.
Among men with normal semen analysis, partners of couples with idiopathic infertility exhibit a distinct sperm molecular profile characterised by telomere shortening and oxidative imbalance. STL, ROS and LP emerged as age-independent biomarkers associated with infertility status and showed promising discriminatory ability in this cohort, supporting their integration as second-level tests to complement routine semen analysis in cases of normozoospermia.
Besides gonadal involvement (hypogonadism, male factor infertility, and testicular hypotrophy), patients with Klinefelter syndrome (KS) may suffer from several extra-gonadic complications, including neoplastic events.
The aim of this review is to summarize all major clinical evidence dealing with the association between KS and neoplastic diseases and provide practical suggestions for the management of patients with KS regarding neoplastic risk.
This narrative review was conducted through a comprehensive search of the PubMed database, using combinations of the following keywords: "Klinefelter syndrome," "cancer," "neoplasm," "breast cancer," "germ cell tumor," "lymphoma," and "testosterone replacement therapy".
KS is associated with a higher risk of breast cancer and mediastinal germ cell tumors and an apparent higher risk of hematological malignancies, in particular non-Hodgkin lymphoma and leukemia. Evidence on testicular cancer is limited, with no clear increase in risk attributable to KS, while prostate cancer has a lower risk and lower mortality rate.
Given the complexity of the syndrome and the limited available evidence, regular clinical follow-up with targeted investigations when clinically indicated may facilitate early diagnosis and management of associated comorbidities.
De Toni L et al., 2026·Journal of endocrinological investigation·Free full text on PubMed Central
Varicocele is a recognized male factor of infertility. Surgical/microsurgical correction represents a therapeutical option to improve fertility outcomes but predictive parameters for the identification who can actually benefit from varicocele correction are under investigated. Here we aimed to identify baseline predictors of semen outcome improvement after varicocele treatment by scleroembolization approach.
85 patients receiving varicocele treatment by anterograde scleroembolization (ASE, N = 42) or retrograde scleroembolization (RSE, N = 43) were retrospectively recruited. Basal and 6-months follow-up evaluation of semen, hormonal and ultrasound parameters (US) were performed to address the respective effect of varicocele treatment. In addition, basal parameters were assessed as clinical outcome predictors.
Varicocele grade reduction was observed in more than 90% of patients (P < 0.001). Compared to basal, significant increase of sperm concentration (10.0 ± 9.2 × 106cells/mL vs. 23.4 ± 26.9 × 106cells/mL; P < 0.001), total sperm count (TSC 39.0 ± 54.5 × 106cells vs. 70.3 ± 90.6 × 106cells, P < 0.001) and total motile sperm count (TMS, 9.8 ± 12.8 × 106cells vs. 36.7 ± 58.1 × 106cells, P < 0.001), was observed, with no differences between RSE or ASE. All US parameters were also improved (all P < 0.001). Logistic regression analysis of basal semen and ultrasound parameters showed that basal sperm motility and left testis-mean transit time (L-MTT) were associated with TSC and TMS doubling at follow-up. However, Receiver Operating Characteristic curve analysis showed that only basal L-MTT basal sperm was consistently associated with TSC and TMS doubling at follow-up (respectively: AUC = 0.834, CI: 0.747-0.921 and AUC = 0.805, CI: 0.708-0.901; both P < 0.001).
Baseline sperm count and US parameters represent useful clinical descriptors to address those subjects eligible for varicocele correction.
Reproductive Surgery › Definitive and Ablative Procedures › Oophorectomy
Francesco Pierconti, Maurizio Martini, Luigi M Larocca, Emilio Sacco, Dario Pugliese, Gaetano Gulino
F Pierconti, M Martini, L Larocca, E Sacco, D Pugliese, G Gulino
PMID 31440206 31440206 DOI 10.3389/fendo.2019.00512 10.3389/fendo.2019.00512 Pierconti et al. 2019, Pierconti 2019