Ethics and Policy · Reproductive Ethics

Informing offspring of their conception by gamete or embryo donation: an Ethics Committee opinion

Ethics Committee of the American Society for Reproductive Medicine

Committee members: Judith Daar, Jean Benward, Lee Collins, Owen Davis, Joseph Davis, Leslie Francis, Elena Gates, Susan Gitlin, Elizabeth Ginsburg, Sigal Klipstein, Laurence McCullough, Richard Reindollar, Ginny Ryan, Mark Sauer, Sean Tipton, Lynn Westphal

Published April 2018 Fertility and sterility
DOI 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2018.01.001 PMID 29605404

RRM Academy Synopsis

ASRM Ethics Committee supports telling donor-conceived children

A 2018 ASRM Ethics Committee opinion supports telling donor-conceived offspring the fact of their donor conception, with recipient parents making the final choice. The committee also backs permanent storage of donors' medical and genetic history for offspring who ask. The document is a position statement with no new data.

Key Findings

  • The committee holds that disclosure to offspring "may serve the offspring's best interests" and, in its summary, supports telling offspring the fact of donor conception.
  • The committee calls the decision "highly personal" and places the choice with the recipient parents.
  • Programs and banks "should gather, maintain, and permanently store" donor medical and genetic information, and should write policies for inquiries from offspring.
  • Releasing a donor's identity is "permissible" when all parties consent, and the committee says providers can no longer promise donors anonymity.
  • Counseling and informed consent about disclosure are called "essential" for donors and recipients.

Interpretation

The document is an ethics opinion: a committee weighed arguments on both sides and stated positions. The committee says the overall benefits of disclosure remain under study, and that no research names an ideal age for telling a child. The document runs no analysis of its own and measures no outcomes. The committee describes it as reflecting members' views and not the only approved standard of practice. The recommendations address programs, donors and recipient parents in the United States.

RRM Context

RRM works to fix the cause of infertility so couples can conceive their own children. Donor conception sits outside that path. The committee's stress on a child knowing their genetic heritage fits RRM's family-centered principles.

Abstract

This document discusses the ethical implications of informing offspring about their conception using gamete or embryo donation. It replaces the 2013 ASRM Ethics Committee document of the same name (Fertil Steril 2013;100:45-9).

Topics

By this author

Related research

Ethics and Policy › Reproductive Ethics › Third Party Reproduction · Clinical Guidelines and Standards › Guidelines by Issuing Body › United States Professional Societies
Judith Daar, Jean Benward, Lee Collins, Owen Davis, Joseph Davis, Leslie Francis, Elena Gates, Susan Gitlin, Elizabeth Ginsburg, Sigal Klipstein, Laurence McCullough, Richard Reindollar, Ginny Ryan, Mark Sauer, Sean Tipton, Lynn Westphal, 0000-0003-0284-2845
J Daar, J Benward, L Collins, O Davis, Joe Davis, Joey Davis, J Davis, L Francis, E Gates, Sue Gitlin, S Gitlin, Liz Ginsburg, Beth Ginsburg, Betsy Ginsburg, E Ginsburg, S Klipstein, Larry McCullough, L McCullough, Rick Reindollar, Dick Reindollar, Rich Reindollar, R Reindollar, G Ryan, M Sauer, S Tipton, L Westphal
PMID 29605404 29605404 DOI 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2018.01.001 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2018.01.001 Ethics Committee of the American Society for Reproductive Medicine et al. 2018, Ethics Committee of the American Society for Reproductive Medicine 2018