Fertility Awareness · Effectiveness
Abstract
L’auto-osservazione e il follow-up grafico del ciclo mestruale in caso di presunta sterilita, aiutano a diagnosticare e trattare certe alterazioni ginecologiche, al fine di attuare il rapporto sessuale finalizzato ad ottimizzare concepimento. Attraverso queste procedure naturali (naprotecnologia), prive di aspetti negativi da un punto di vista etico, possiamo ottenere tassi di natalita che sono paragonabili, o addirittura superiori, a quelle ottenute con trattamenti invasivi. ---------- Self-observation and the graphic follow-up of the menstrual cycle in cases of supposed infertility, help to diagnose and treat certain gynaecological alterations in order to carry out the sexual intercourse focused on optimising conception. Through these natural procedures (Naprotechnology), with no ethical drawbacks, we can obtain birth rates that are comparable, or even higher, to those obtained with invasive treatments.
Topics
Related research
Effectiveness · Fertile Window Estimation
Experiencia preliminar en el uso del registro de fertilidad en una cohorte de pacientes de infertilidad en un servicio de ginecología y obstetricia
Arraztoa JA et al., 2015 · Med UPB
to study the results in patients undergoing infertility treatment with a focus on restorative medicine (NaProTechnology) at a department of obstetrics and gynecology. Methodology: retrospective cohort study conducted by the gynecology and obstetrics department at Universidad de los Andes (Santiago, Chile) in infertility patients from a suburban area of Santiago de Chile, who received treatment between 2006 and 2014. All couples received instructions on how to recognize their fertility period according to a local teaching model based on the Creighton Model FertilityCare System. They also received medical treatment to induce ovulation and/or widen their fertile period, or surgical treatment. The main outcome was the number of pregnancies. 131 patients received instructions. The mean age was 33.6 years. Seventyeight patients (59.5%) consulted due to primary infertility; 53 (40.5%) due to secondary infertility. The duration of group infertility was 4.1 years. The mean use of the method was 12.6 months (median, 9 months). The infertility causes identified included anovulation (50.4%), tubo-peritoneal factors (18.3%), endometriosis (14.5%), uterine factors (9.2%), cervical factors (8.4%) and masculine factors (19.1%). There were 33 pregnancies (25.2 global). The crude proportion of pregnancies at 24 months was 22.9% and the proportion adjusted by the life table at 24 months was 40 per 100 couples. the focus on restorative medicine is effective to achieve pregnancy but it requires a long-term longitudinal treatment. Early discontinuation of fertility charting affects the efficacy of this focus. More research is warranted to optimize medical treatment.
Methods · Sympto-Thermal Method
Natural methods of family planning
Flynn AM, 1984 · Clin Obstet Gynaecol
Reliable indicators to detect the fertile and infertile phases in the menstrual cycle are now available, largely due to the intensive scientific research into fertility over the past decade. This means that couples who follow the rules of the different NFP methodologies have a highly effective means of birth control, without the introduction of hormones, chemicals or devices into the body. New scientific techniques can be expected within the next couple of years which will simplify the detection of the fertile phase and hopefully help to elucidate the grey area of the early fertile days, where most of the unplanned pregnancies occur. Fertility awareness by both partners is an important positive contribution to the whole sexual relationship and emphasizes that NFP is an educational delivery system rather than a technological one. The modification of sexual behaviour and the motivation of both partners for the successful use of NFP may initially present a problem to some couples. On the other hand, many partners find the discipline enhances their sexual relationship and dialogue. Whatever the motivation, today more and more couples are happier to be in autonomous control of their bodies and their fertility.
Restorative Care and Assisted Reproduction · Outcome Comparisons
Assisted reproductive techniques and NaProTechnology
Dowbór-Dzwonka A et al., 2012 · Zdr Publ · Free to read
Infertility is a significant and constantly increasing individual and social problem. It is estimated that at present it affects approx. 15 to 20 percent of couples. Inability to conceive a child elicits a range of unfavourable implications in the scope of emotional experiences, in the partner’s relationship and in a broader social perspective. Making a decision on undergoing diagnostics and infertility treatment is a difficult and often postponed moment for many couples. This is an expression of the escape model of dealing with a situation that threatens with a fall of self-esteem. However, if a couple reacts in a task-oriented way and participates in the diagnostic and therapeutic procedure, new doubts appear connected with the medical, psychological, social and ethical sphere. Infertility treatment sometimes prompts fear connected with the stripping of intimacy, loss of control over one’s body, possible complications and unsuccessful therapy. This article is an analysis of the medical and the other aspects of struggling with infertility with reference to two extremely different methods of solving this NaProTechnology as a process of assisting natural procreation and assisted reproductive techniques with a special consideration of in vitro fertilization.
Reproductive Ethics · Conscience Protections
NaProTECHNOLOGY and Conscientious OB/GYN Medicine
Jemelka BE et al., 2013 · Virtual Mentor
In the last 50 years, a surge of reproductive technology has revolutionized the practice of obstetrics and gynecology. First, effective hormonal contraceptives were made available to the public in the 1960s and, since their debut, have been used to treat almost every gynecologic abnormality [1]. Second, in the past 30 years, infertility has largely been managed using assisted reproductive technologies (ART), primarily intrauterine insemination (IUI) with recourse to in vitro fertilization (IVF) when insemination fails [2]. As a result, the modus operandi in mainstream gynecology has been to suppress, or to bypass, the woman’s fertility cycle. Physicians and patients who (1) conscientiously object to the therapeutic use of hormonal contraceptives on the grounds that it subjects patients to ineffective treatment of symptoms rather than treating their underlying disease and (2) morally oppose the ART approach to infertility on the grounds that it jettisons a loving act of marital intercourse, the one context worthy of the conception of a new human being, are now able to pursue an alternative approach that accords with their consciences. NaProTECHNOLOGY (an acronym for natural procreative technology) is a woman’s health science that encompasses a unique medical and surgical application of gynecology. The foundation of NPT is the Creighton Model FertilityCare System (CrMS), see Figure 1, the only prospective and standardized means of monitoring the various patterns of a woman’s menstrual and fertility cycle for the natural regulation of fertility. For example, because it views infertility as a symptom rather than a disease, NPT seeks to diagnose and treat the underlying causes of infertility so that the couple can more successfully conceive within their own acts of intercourse, especially during peak-day-focused intercourse. NPT infertility protocols depend on patient-specific charting data. Some observations during the fertility cycle—dry, limited, or continuous mucus; short or variable post-peak phase; premenstrual spotting or tail-end brown bleeding—are external signs of possible underlying disease processes. A medical interpretation of these abnormal CrMS observations leads to a targeted biochemical and hormonal evaluation, which in turn identifies target organ dysfunctions: decreased production of estrogenic cervical mucus, intermenstrual bleeding or spotting, short or variable luteal phases, and suboptimal levels of the ovarian hormones (estrogen or progesterone). Common treatments for these pathologies include induction or stimulation of ovulation, medications to enhance cervical mucus, and hormonal support in the luteal phase. When these NPT medical approaches to infertility were used in a study of 1,239 infertile couples, they resulted in a live birth rate similar to that of cohort ART treatments [3]. In many cases, medical applications of NPT are sufficient to treat infertility successfully; in other cases, surgical intervention is also required. Surgical NPT is a specialized form of gynecologic surgery the primary aim of which is to reconstruct the uterus, fallopian tubes, and ovaries. The ovarian wedge resection (surgical removal of a portion of an enlarged ovary to restore its normal size), for example, is effective in healing polycystic ovaries (contributing to the long-term treatment of some of the endocrine and menstrual cycle abnormalities associated with polycystic ovaries). It also brings the patient a 70 percent chance of pregnancy i.e., it is twice as effective as clomiphene [4]. A significant benefit of surgical NaProTECHNOLOGY is “near adhesion-free” surgery. One of the biggest pitfalls of surgery, of course, is the formation of postoperative adhesions, which can decrease tubal motility (adversely affecting fertility) and cause small bowel obstructions (that frequently require emergency reoperation) [5]. To prevent these complications, NPT surgical techniques pay meticulous attention to detail, take a systematic approach, and use Gore-Tex adhesion barriers [6]. Published Gore-Tex protocols reveal a statistically significant decrease in subsequent adhesion scores on second-look laparoscopy [7]. For some reason, the use of Gore-Tex has been overlooked in even the most recent adhesion prevention reviews [8]. One even laments that adhesion prevention is a “surprisingly neglected aspect of the treatment of endometriosis,” but the reviewers make no mention of the use of Gore-Tex as an adhesion barrier. Other techniques of surgical NPT include laser vaporization and pelvic excision and repair surgery (PEARS) of peritoneal or ovarian endometriosis. PEARS is a form of plastic reconstructive surgery of the pelvis with the primary intent of removing diseased tissue within the pelvic organs and repairing organs in a way that does not form pelvic adhesions. PEARS can entail robot-assisted laparoscopy or laparotomy, minimizing postoperative adhesions and optimizing the patient’s chances for pregnancy. The effectiveness of treating infertility with medical and surgical NPT is comparable to that of ART interventions. The cumulative live birth rate in patients receiving IVF is between 45-55% [10]. In a study population of 1,045 patients treated with NPT infertility protocols, more than 60 percent became pregnant within 24 months and nearly 70 percent within 36 months [11]. The overall �per-woman� NPT pregnancy rate is higher than that of ART due, in part, to the high rate of dropout or discontinuation in patients who undergo IVF treatment [12]. In addition, a meta-analysis comparing conventional surgery and IVF for treatment of endometriosis-related infertility found that the per-woman pregnancy rates with surgery were 55.3 percent while those with IVF were 9.9 percent [13]. However, while it is true patients treated with NPT have significantly lower overall fecundability (a 3.13 percent chance of conceiving within a given period) than those treated with IVF (13.3 percent), it is also true that the number of women who ultimately achieve a pregnancy with NPT is higher than the number who get pregnant using ART [14]. Thus, although achieving a live birth with NPT may take longer, it has a greater chance of occurring than with IVF. For those interested in training in NPT, the Pope Paul VI Institute and Creighton University School of Medicine offer educational programs for those in primary care or ob/gyn (including fourth-year medical students) to train in the medical applications of NaProTECHNOLOGY [15]. They also offer a 1-year fellowship in the surgical applications of NPT for ob/gyns who have completed their residencies [16].
Fertility Awareness › Effectiveness › Comparative Effectiveness · Restorative Reproductive Medicine › NaProTechnology › Protocols and Framework · Menstrual Cycle › Cycle Biomarkers › Cervical Mucus
DOI 10.4081/mem.2013.84 10.4081/mem.2013.84 Otte et al. 2013, Otte 2013
Cite this article
Otte, A. (2013). La conoscenza dei cicli sessuali femminili attraverso l’auto-osservazione per il trattamento della sterilità umana. Medicina e Morale. https://doi.org/10.4081/mem.2013.84
Otte A. La conoscenza dei cicli sessuali femminili attraverso l’auto-osservazione per il trattamento della sterilità umana. Medicina e Morale. 2013. doi:10.4081/mem.2013.84
Otte, A. "La conoscenza dei cicli sessuali femminili attraverso l’auto-osservazione per il trattamento della sterilità umana." Medicina e Morale, 2013.