Assisted Reproduction Safety and Risks

Medically Assisted Reproduction and Risk of Cancer Among Offspring

Rios P, Herlemont P, Fauque P, Lacour B, Jouannet P, Weill A, Zureik M, Clavel J, Dray-Spira R

Published May 2024 JAMA network open
DOI 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.9429 PMID 38696167 PMC PMC11066701

RRM Academy Synopsis

Acute lymphoblastic leukemia was higher after frozen embryo transfer

Children born after frozen embryo transfer had a higher risk of acute lymphoblastic leukemia than naturally conceived children, a French national cohort of 8 526 306 children found. For all cancers together, risk in each treatment group did not differ from natural conception. Leukemia risk was also higher after fresh embryo transfer among births from 2010 to 2015.

Study at a glance, observational cohort of 8 526 306 children: Leukemia was higher after frozen embryo transfer
Study at a glance, observational cohort of 8 526 306 children: Leukemia was higher after frozen embryo transfer. Source: Rios P et al., 2024, PMID 38696167.

Key Findings

  • After frozen embryo transfer, acute lymphoblastic leukemia was higher: 20 cases; adjusted risk difference 23.2 per million person-years (95% CI 1.5 to 57.0); hazard ratio [HR] 1.61 (95% CI 1.04 to 2.50).
  • In 2010 to 2015 births, leukemia was significantly higher after fresh embryo transfer (45 cases; HR 1.42, 95% CI 1.06 to 1.92) but not after frozen (HR 1.27, 0.70 to 2.29).
  • For any cancer, HRs against natural conception were 1.12 (95% CI 0.96 to 1.31) after fresh embryo transfer, 1.02 (0.78 to 1.32) after frozen and 1.09 (0.86 to 1.38) after artificial insemination.
  • Of 8 526 306 children born in France, 133 965 followed fresh embryo transfer, 66 165 followed frozen embryo transfer and 60 106 followed artificial insemination.

Interpretation

The study is an observational cohort drawn from French national health insurance and hospital records. It reports associations and cannot show that embryo transfer causes leukemia. Case counts are small, such as 20 after frozen embryo transfer, and the authors did not adjust for multiple comparisons. They could not separate treatment effects from the parents' underlying conditions. Median follow-up was 4.4 years after frozen embryo transfer and 6.7 years for naturally conceived children. Post hoc tests comparing treatment types were not significant (P = .07 and P = .06).

RRM Context

Embryo transfer goes around the reason a couple has not conceived. The authors note that the conditions behind infertility could not be separated from treatment effects. Restorative reproductive medicine evaluates both partners to find and treat the cause of infertility.

Abstract

Cancer is a leading cause of death among children worldwide. Treatments used for medically assisted reproduction (MAR) are suspected risk factors because of their potential for epigenetic disturbance and associated congenital malformations. To assess the risk of cancer, overall and by cancer type, among children born after MAR compared with children conceived naturally. For this cohort study, the French National Mother-Child Register (EPI-MERES) was searched for all live births that occurred in France between January 1, 2010, and December 31, 2021 (and followed up until June 30, 2022). The EPI-MERES was built from comprehensive data of the French National Health Data System. Data analysis was performed from December 1, 2021, to June 30, 2023. Use of assisted reproduction technologies (ART), such as fresh embryo transfer (ET) or frozen ET (FET), and artificial insemination (AI). The risk of cancer was compared, overall and by cancer type, among children born after fresh ET, FET, or AI and children conceived naturally, using Cox proportional hazards regression models adjusted for maternal and child characteristics at birth. This study included 8 526 306 children with a mean (SD) age of 6.4 (3.4) years; 51.2% were boys, 96.4% were singletons, 12.1% were small for gestational age at birth, and 3.1% had a congenital malformation. There were 260 236 children (3.1%) born after MAR, including 133 965 (1.6%) after fresh ET, 66 165 (0.8%) after FET, and 60 106 (0.7%) after AI. A total of 9256 case patients with cancer were identified over a median follow-up of 6.7 (IQR, 3.7-9.6) years; 165, 57, and 70 were born after fresh ET, FET, and AI, respectively. The overall risk of cancer did not differ between children conceived naturally and those born after fresh ET (hazard ratio [HR], 1.12 [95% CI, 0.96 to 1.31]), FET (HR, 1.02 [95% CI, 0.78 to 1.32]), or AI (HR, 1.09 [95% CI, 0.86 to 1.38]). However, the risk of acute lymphoblastic leukemia was higher among children born after FET (20 case patients; HR 1.61 [95% CI, 1.04 to 2.50]; risk difference [RD], 23.2 [95% CI, 1.5 to 57.0] per million person-years) compared with children conceived naturally. Moreover, among children born between 2010 and 2015, the risk of leukemia was higher among children born after fresh ET (45 case patients; HR, 1.42 [95% CI, 1.06 to 1.92]; adjusted RD, 19.7 [95% CI, 2.8 to 43.2] per million person-years). The findings of this cohort study suggest that children born after FET or fresh ET had an increased risk of leukemia compared with children conceived naturally. This risk, although resulting in a limited number of cases, needs to be monitored in view of the continuous increase in the use of ART.

Topics

By this author

Related research

Assisted Reproduction › Safety and Risks › Long Term Child Outcomes
Paula Rios, Philippe Herlemont, Patricia Fauque, Brigitte Lacour, Pierre Jouannet, Alain Weill, Mahmoud Zureik, Jacqueline Clavel, Rosemary Dray-Spira
P Rios, P Herlemont, Pat Fauque, Trish Fauque, P Fauque, B Lacour, P Jouannet, A Weill, M Zureik, J Clavel, R Dray-Spira
PMID 38696167 38696167 DOI 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.9429 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.9429 Rios et al. 2024, Rios 2024