To review, evaluate, and synthesize current published reports assessing the value of abdominal myomectomy in infertile women and those desiring to preserve fertility potential.
DATA IDENTIFICATION: Major studies dealing with myomectomy were identified through Medline Searches.
STUDY SELECTION: Those papers reporting the results of myomectomy, factors influencing them, and potential future innovations were obtained.
Results
More than half of women not previously pregnant and undergoing myomectomy to preserve childbearing capacity for treatment of recurrent pregnancy wastage or previous infertility conceive. The long duration of infertility before surgery, absence of other factors to explain their not conceiving, and short time interval subsequent to surgery in which conception occurs suggests myomectomy has value in treatment of patients with leiomyomata and otherwise unexplained infertility. The operation carries acceptable risk. Approximately 25% of women undergoing myomectomy have recurrent leiomyomata, but most recurrences are sufficiently delayed to allow adequate opportunity for conception.
Conclusions
Abdominal myomectomy is an appropriate alternative to hysterectomy for most women who wish to preserve childbearing potential or enhance it. For the future, myomectomy by endoscopic techniques may hold similar potential.
PMID 1623990 1623990 DOI 10.1016/s0015-0282(16)55128-0 10.1016/s0015-0282(16)55128-0 Verkauf et al. 1992, Verkauf 1992
Cite this article
Verkauf, B. S. (1992). Myomectomy for fertility enhancement and preservation. Fertility and sterility, 58(1), 1-15. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0015-0282(16)55128-0
Verkauf BS. Myomectomy for fertility enhancement and preservation. Fertil Steril. 1992;58(1):1-15. doi:10.1016/s0015-0282(16)55128-0
Verkauf, Barry S. "Myomectomy for fertility enhancement and preservation." Fertility and sterility, vol. 58, no. 1, 1992, pp. 1-15.
Bulletti FM et al., 2025·Clin Med�Insights�Reprod�Health·
Open Access
Infertility affects around 17.5% of reproductive-aged individuals worldwide, posing significant personal and public health challenges. Although Medically Assisted Reproduction and Assisted Reproductive Technology (ART; e.g., in vitro fertilization) have advanced outcomes, many couples fail to conceive due to unaddressed pelvic, uterine, or systemic factors. We aim to (1) define the current usage of Restorative Reproduction Medicine (RRM) in clinical practice, (2) compare RRM outcomes with conventional ART, and (3) propose an integrated model of RRM plus ART for optimal fertility care.
A systematic review following PRISMA guidelines was conducted (INPLASY registration no. INPLASY2024110069). Data sources and We searched PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science (January 1995–October 2024), combining terms such as “restorative reproductive medicine,” “intrauterine adhesions,” “myomas,” “polyps,” “hydrosalpinx,” “endometritis,” “BMI,” “thyroid dysfunction,” “microbiome,” and “assisted reproductive technology.” Inclusion criteria: studies on uterine/systemic factors affecting infertility, focusing on surgical/pharmacological RRM interventions and ART limitations. Exclusion criteria: male-only infertility, case reports, narrative reviews, non-English publications. Quality assessment employed the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale and the Cochrane Risk of Bias Tool. We also briefly noted potential publication bias due to language and study-type restrictions. From >25,000 initial titles, 3 sequential screenings yielded 145 key articles addressing uterine (septum, myomas, polyps, adhesions) and systemic (body mass index (BMI) extremes, thyroid dysfunction, microbiome imbalance) factors. Surgical corrections (e.g., hysteroscopic removal of polyps/myomas, salpingectomy for hydrosalpinx) significantly improved natural conception and ART success (⩾20%–40% increase in clinical pregnancy). Chronic endometritis treatment, endometrial microbiome modulation, and BMI/thyroid optimization further improved pregnancy rates by 15%–20%. Comparisons of RRM versus ART alone indicated that RRM often lowers overall cost and may reduce miscarriage, while ART offers immediate embryo transfer. Combining RRM to correct pathologies prior to ART can boost implantation and live birth rates (⩾40%–70% improvement in some studies). Restorative Reproductive Medicine comprehensively addresses pelvic and systemic abnormalities, thereby enhancing fertility outcomes and complementing ART. A proposed integrated model—RRM diagnostics/interventions followed by ART if needed—maximizes success, reduces time/cost, and emphasizes holistic reproductive health. Further multicenter trials are warranted to standardize protocols and fully realize RRM’s potential in modern fertility care.
Beneficial and detrimental effect of surgical adenomyomectomy is still controversial in infertile women with severely diffuse adenomyosis. The primary objective of this study was to assess whether a novel method of fertility-preserving adenomyomectomy could improve pregnancy rates. The secondary objective was to evaluate whether it could improve dysmenorrhea and menorrhagia symptoms in infertile patients with severe adenomyosis. A prospective clinical trial was conducted between December 2007 and September 2016. Fifty women with infertility due to adenomyosis were enrolled in this study after clinical assessments by infertility experts. A novel method of fertility-preserving adenomyomectomy was performed on 45 of 50 patients. The procedure included T- or transverse H-incision of the uterine serosa followed by preparation of the serosal flap, excision of the adenomyotic tissue using argon laser under ultrasonographic monitoring, and a novel technique of suturing between the residual myometrium and serosal flap. All patients obtained dysmenorrhea relief 6 months postoperatively (NRS 7.28 vs 1.56, P<.001). The amount of menstrual blood decreased significantly (140.44 vs 66.33 mL, P<.05). Of the 33 patients who attempted pregnancy postoperatively, 18 (54.5%) conceived either by natural means, in vitro fertilization and embryo transfer (IVF-ET), or thawing embryo transfer. Miscarriage occurred in 8 patients, while 10 (30.3%) had viable pregnancies. This novel method of adenomyomectomy resulted in improved pregnancy rates, as well as relief of dysmenorrhea and menorrhagia. This operation is effective in preserving fertility potential in infertile women with diffuse adenomyosis.
Hilgers TW, 2004·The Medical and Surgical Practice of NaProTECHNOLOGY·
Uterine fibroids contribute to abnormal uterine bleeding, dysmenorrhea, recurrent pregnancy loss, and implantation failure, making myomectomy a central NaProTECHNOLOGY surgical intervention for women seeking conception. PEARS myomectomy technique prioritizes uterine preservation, meticulous layered closure of the myometrial defect, and hemostasis strategies that minimize adhesion formation and support subsequent pregnancy.
Oliveira MAP et al., 2018·Archives of gynecology and obstetrics
Adenomyosis is defined as the presence of endometrial glands and stroma within the myometrium. The true prevalence is unknown and has been reported to range from 1 to 70%. It has a significantly negative impact on women's quality of life, causing abnormal uterine bleeding, dysmenorrhea, and chronic pelvic pain. The definitive treatment for adenomyosis is hysterectomy, although it does not contemplate patients who wish to preserve their fertility. The aim of this paper is to discuss the latest evidence on the surgical techniques for the treatment of adenomyosis published in medical-scientific databases. A comprehensive literature search for articles published from 1996 to 2017 related to surgery for adenomyosis was made in Pubmed, Medline, the Cochrane Library, and Google Scholar, in English, by the following MeSH terms: adenomyosis, surgery, pathogenesis, dysmenorrhea and infertility. There is extensive evidence on several surgical approaches for the improvement of adenomyosis-related symptoms; however, there is no robust evidence that they are effective for infertility. The management of adenomyosis is quite complex and controversial. Complications after extensive uterine reconstruction, such as uterine rupture, should be considered and discussed with the patient. There are still limited data to support surgery effectiveness, especially for infertility, and further well-designed studies are required.