The flourishing of the individual human person, the health of human society, and the ecological well being of planet earth are inextricably connected with the issues of human population, sexuality, and reproduction. Many academic disciplines have strong interests in these issues, approaching them from different perspectives and with different emphases. However, these areas of study are also infused with controversy and strong ideological positions arising from cultural, religious, political, and social traditions that sometimes clash with each other. To address these issues, two things are needed: (1) data that address questions from different underlying assumptions; (2) open and respectful discussion among scientists, clinicians, and policy makers who have different backgrounds, narrative frameworks, and conceptual perspectives (1). The new Section on Population, Reproductive and Sexual Health, Frontiers in Public Health will contribute constructively to these critical needs.
population reproductive health data, sexual health policy evidence, reproductive health ideological conflict, interdisciplinary reproductive research, population studies sexual health, evidence-based reproductive policy, reproductive rights data needs, sexual health academic disciplines, population health reproduction intersection, reproductive health data gaps
PMID 27014671 27014671 DOI 10.3389/fpubh.2016.00027 10.3389/fpubh.2016.00027 Stanford et al. 2016, Stanford 2016
Cite this article
Stanford, J. B. (2016). Population, Reproductive, and Sexual Health: Data Are Essential Where Disciplines Meet and Ideologies Conflict. Frontiers in public health, 4, 27. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2016.00027
Stanford JB. Population, Reproductive, and Sexual Health: Data Are Essential Where Disciplines Meet and Ideologies Conflict. Front Public Health. 2016;4:27. doi:10.3389/fpubh.2016.00027
Stanford, J. B. "Population, Reproductive, and Sexual Health: Data Are Essential Where Disciplines Meet and Ideologies Conflict." Frontiers in public health, vol. 4, 2016, pp. 27.
Keywords
Adolescent Pregnancy, Oppositional Collaboration, Population Dynamics, Reproductive Health, Sexual Health
Related articles
Measurement and Statistics · Instrument Development and Validation
Global fertility rates are declining. In China, the total fertility rate dropped sharply from 5.59 in 1971 to 1.15 in 2021. Chinese university students often lack adequate fertility awareness, yet no validated instrument exists to assess this construct in this population, despite its recognized importance for informed reproductive decision-making. The Fertility Awareness Scale for University Students (FASUS) was developed through literature search, semi-structured interviews, and two rounds of Delphi expert consultation. Psychometric properties were tested using exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis, Cronbach's α, split-half reliability, and test-retest reliability. A cross-sectional survey of 750 students examined fertility awareness levels and influencing factors via univariate analysis and multiple linear regression. The final FASUS Scale consisted of 22 items across three dimensions: fertility-related knowledge, reproductive health attitudes, and reproductive health skills, with a cumulative variance contribution rate of 67.952%. The scale demonstrated strong reliability (Cronbach's α = 0.97, split-half reliability = 0.885, test-retest reliability = 0.981). A survey of 750 students revealed an average fertility awareness score of 78.01 ± 16.44, indicating a low to moderate level. Key influencing factors included gender, ethnicity, education level, only-child status, and prior fertility knowledge education. This study utilized a self-developed scale to assess fertility awareness among Chinese university students. The results showed that the fertility awareness level of Chinese university students was generally low. We suggest that health care institutions implement targeted intervention measures to improve reproductive health outcomes.
Lahimer M et al., 2023·Front Public Health·
Open Access
The deleterious effects of chemical or non-chemical endocrine disruptors (EDs) on male fertility potential is well documented but still not fully elucidated. For example, the detection of industrial chemicals' metabolites in seminal plasma and follicular fluid can affect efficiency of the gametogenesis, the maturation and competency of gametes and has guided scientists to hypothesize that endocrine disrupting chemicals (EDCs) may disrupt hormonal homoeostasis by leading to a wide range of hormonal control impairments. The effects of EDCs exposure on reproductive health are highly dependent on factors including the type of EDCs, the duration of exposure, individual susceptibility, and the presence of other co-factors. Research and scientists continue to study these complex interactions. The aim of this review is to summarize the literature to better understand the potential reproductive health risks of EDCs in France.
Infertility has been confirmed as a significant medical and social problem. Heavy metal exposure refers to a risk factor for infertility, which is capable of damaging the reproductive system of males and females. However, heavy metal exposure and female infertility have rarely been investigated. The aim of this study was to analyze the association between heavy metal exposure and female infertility. A cross-sectional study using data from three cycles of the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES, 2013-2018) was performed. Female infertility was evaluated by positive responses to question rhq074 in the questionnaire. Cadmium (Cd), lead (Pb), mercury (Hg), and arsenic (As) levels in blood or urine were examined by inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry. The correlation between heavy metal and female infertility was analyzed through weighted logistic regression. A total of 838 American women aged 20-44 years were covered in the study. Among all participants, 112 (13.37%) women were subjected to infertility. Urinary Cd and urinary As levels were significantly higher in infertile women than in control women (P < 0.05, P < 0.05). Urinary As showed a positive correlation with the prevalence of female infertility, and the risk of infertility rose with the increase of urinary As levels (P for trend = 0.045). Urinary Cd was associated with female infertility in some weighted logistic regression (Crude, Q2: OR = 3.99, 95% CI 1.82, 8.74, Q3: OR = 2.90, 95% CI 1.42, 5.92. Model 1, Q2: OR = 3.68, 95% CI 1.64, 8.27, Q3: OR = 2.33, 95% CI 1.13, 4.48. Model 2, Q2: OR = 4.11, 95% CI 1.63, 10.07, Q3: OR = 2.44, 95% CI 1.07, 5.53. Model 3, Q2: OR = 3.77, 95% CI 1.52, 9.35). Moreover, blood Pb (OR = 1.52, 95% CI 1.07, 2.16), urinary Pb (OR = 1.68, 95% CI 1.11, 2.55), and urinary As (OR = 1.02, 95% CI 1.00, 1.03) were positively correlated with the risk of infertility in women aged 35-44 years. The blood Pb (OR = 1.67, 95% CI 1.16, 2.40, 2.49) and urinary Pb (OR = 1.54, 95% CI 1.00, 2.38) in women with BMI ≥25 were positively correlated with the risk of infertility. Urinary As was significantly associated with female infertility, and the risk of infertility increased with higher urinary As levels. To some extent, urinary Cd was correlated with infertility. Blood/urine Pb was related to infertility in advanced age and overweight/obese women. The results of this study need to be further validated in future prospective studies.
Alvarez-Mon MA et al., 2021·Front Public Health·
Open Access
Media outlets influence social attitudes toward health habits. The analysis of tweets has become a tool for health researchers. The objective of this study was to investigate the distribution of tweets about women's health and the interest generated among Twitter users. We investigated tweets posted by 25 major U.S. media outlets about pre-menopausal and post-menopausal women's health between January 2009 and December 2019 as well as the retweets generated. In addition, we measured the sentiment analysis of these tweets as well as their potential dissemination. A total of 376 tweets were analyzed. Pre-menopausal women's health accounted for most of the tweets (75.3%). Contraception was the main focus of the tweets, while a very limited number were related to infertility (1.4%). With regard to medical content, the effectiveness of contraceptive methods was the most frequent topic (46.2%). However, tweets related to side effects achieved the highest retweet-to-tweet ratio (70.3). The analysis of sentiments showed negative perceptions on tubal ligation. The U.S. media outlets analyzed are more interested in pre-menopausal than in post-menopausal women health and focused their content on contraception, while Twitter users showed greater interest in side effects.