Progesterone for women with threatened miscarriage (STOP trial): a placebo-controlled randomized clinical trial

McLindon LA, James G, Beckmann MM, Bertolone J, Mahomed K, Vane M, Baker T, Gleed M, Grey S, Tettamanzi L, Mol BWJ, Li W

Human Reproduction, 2023
DOI 10.1093/humrep/dead029 PMID 36806843 PMC PMC10069850

RRM Academy Synopsis

Vaginal progesterone did not raise live births in early bleeding

In a Brisbane trial of 278 pregnant women with early bleeding, half assigned to a dummy pessary, vaginal progesterone did not raise the chance of a live birth. About 82 out of 100 women on progesterone and 84 out of 100 on placebo gave birth to a living baby.

Key Findings

  • Live births: 112 of 136 women on progesterone (82.4%) and 112 of 133 on placebo (84.2%); relative risk 0.98, confidence interval 0.88–1.09.
  • Women with at least one previous miscarriage: 54 of 67 (80.6%) on progesterone and 65 of 77 (84.4%) on placebo; relative risk 0.95, confidence interval 0.82–1.11.
  • Miscarriage: 20 of 136 (14.7%) on progesterone and 21 of 133 (15.8%) on placebo; relative risk 0.93, confidence interval 0.53–1.64.
  • Preterm birth: 17 of 132 (12.9%) and 12 of 129 (9.3%); relative risk 1.38, confidence interval 0.69–2.78. Median birth weight: 3310 g and 3300 g.
  • Four losses occurred between 20 and 23 weeks of pregnancy, all in the progesterone group (4/136 versus 0/133).

Interpretation

The STOP trial was a single-center, double-blinded, placebo-controlled randomized trial at the Mater Mothers' Hospitals in Brisbane. The trial enrolled women with bleeding, a live singleton intrauterine pregnancy and under 10 weeks of gestation. They received progesterone or placebo pessaries from randomization until 12 weeks of gestation. The data monitoring committee stopped the trial at a planned interim analysis for futility, after 278 of 386 planned women. The authors note that a single site and a 21% participation rate may limit generalizability. A larger UK trial suggested a stronger effect with more previous miscarriages. That trial continued progesterone to 16 weeks, a longer course than STOP's 12 weeks. The Brisbane subgroups showed no such pattern.

RRM Context

The authors call for dedicated trials in women with previous miscarriage. They cite a 2021 Cochrane update that set aside 13 of 20 eligible studies after trustworthiness screening. The update found that progestogens likely change live birth little in recurrent miscarriage. Restorative reproductive medicine evaluates each woman's own history and cycle.

Abstract

In women with threatened miscarriage, does progesterone supplementation until the completion of the first trimester of pregnancy increase the probability of live birth? In women with threatened miscarriage, 400 mg vaginal progesterone nightly, from onset of bleeding until 12 weeks, did not increase live birth rates. Limited evidence has indicated that vaginal micronized progesterone may make little or no difference to the live birth rate when compared with placebo in women with threatened miscarriage. Subgroup analysis of one recent randomized trial reported that in women with bleeding and at least one previous miscarriage, progesterone might be of benefit. We performed a randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled trial between February 2012 and April 2019. Eligible pregnant women under 10 weeks gestation, experiencing a threatened miscarriage as apparent from vaginal bleeding were randomized into two groups in a 1:1 ratio: the intervention group received 400 mg progesterone as vaginal pessaries, the control group received placebo vaginal pessaries, both until 12 weeks gestation. The primary endpoint was live birth. We planned to randomize 386 women (193 per group). The study was stopped at a planned interim analysis for futility after randomization of 278 women. This trial was conducted at the Mater Mothers' Hospital, a tertiary centre for maternity care in South Brisbane, Queensland, Australia. We randomized 139 women to the intervention group and 139 women to the placebo group. Primary outcome data were available for 136 women in the intervention group and 133 women in the placebo group. The live birth rates were 82.4% (112/136) and 84.2% (112/133) in the intervention group and placebo group, respectively (risk ratio (RR) 0.98, 95% CI 0.88 to 1.09; risk difference -0.02, 95% CI -0.11 to 0.07; P = 0.683). Among women with at least one previous miscarriage, live birth rates were 80.6% (54/67) and 84.4% (65/77) (RR 0.95, 95% CI 0.82-1.11; P = 0.550). No significant effect was seen from progesterone in women with two (RR 1.28, 95% CI 0.96-1.72; P = 0.096) or more (RR 0.79, 95% CI 0.53-1.19; P = 0.267) previous miscarriages. Preterm birth rates were 12.9% and 9.3%, respectively (RR 1.38; 95% CI 0.69 to 2.78; P = 0.361). Median birth weight was 3310 vs 3300 g (P = 0.992). There were also no other significant differences in obstetric and perinatal outcomes. Our study was single centre and did not reach the planned sample size because it was stopped prematurely at an interim analysis. We did not find evidence supporting the treatment effect of vaginal progesterone in women with threatened miscarriage. Progesterone in this setting should not be routinely used for threatened miscarriage. The treatment effect in women with threatened miscarriage after previous miscarriages warrants further research. Mothers' and babies Golden Casket Clinical Fellowship (L.A.M.). Progesterone and placebo pessaries were provided by Perrigo Australia.B.W.J.M. reports grants from NHMRC, personal fees from ObsEva, personal fees from Merck KGaA, personal fees from Guerbet, personal fees from iGenomix, outside the submitted work. ACTRN12611000405910. 19 April 2011. 06 February 2012.

By this author

Related research

Lucas A McLindon, Gabriel James, Michael M Beckmann, Julia Bertolone, Kassam Mahomed, Monica Vane, Teresa Baker, Monique Gleed, Sandra Grey, Linda Tettamanzi, Ben Willem J Mol, Wentao Li
L McLindon, G James, Mike Beckmann, M Beckmann, J Bertolone, K Mahomed, M Vane, T Baker, M Gleed, S Grey, L Tettamanzi, Benjamin Mol, B Mol, W Li
PMID 36806843 36806843 DOI 10.1093/humrep/dead029 10.1093/humrep/dead029 McLindon et al. 2023, McLindon 2023