Das, S., Nardo, L. G., & Seif, M. W. (2007). Proximal tubal disease: the place for tubal cannulation. Reproductive BioMedicine Online. https://doi.org/10.1016/s1472-6483(10)60362-8
Das S, Nardo LG, Seif MW. Proximal tubal disease: the place for tubal cannulation. Reproductive BioMedicine Online. 2007. doi:10.1016/s1472-6483(10)60362-8
Das, S., et al. "Proximal tubal disease: the place for tubal cannulation." Reproductive BioMedicine Online, 2007.
For EndNote, Zotero or Mendeley:
License
No open license is recorded for this paper. Reuse terms are set by the publisher.
Author affiliations
1 institution
Institute of Post Graduate Medical Education and Research00ysvbp68
Linked to ROR, the Research Organization Registry
Abstract
Tubal disease is the cause of subfertility in approximately 30% of women, and 10-25% of these are due to proximal tubal obstruction. False-positive diagnosis of proximal tubal obstruction can be as high as 50%. A decrease in expertise in tubal microsurgery has resulted largely from the use of IVF as the treatment option for most causes of infertility and more specifically for tubal factor infertility. Selective salpingography and tubal cannulation have a unique role in the management of tubal infertility and should be offered to selected candidates prior to IVF. Tubal cannulation can be used effectively to restore patency in a proportion of cases of proximal tubal obstruction thus avoiding the need for expensive assisted reproductive techniques. This review examines the evidence supporting the effectiveness of tubal cannulation and aims to enhance awareness of the procedure as an option for the management of female subfertility secondary to isolated proximal tubal obstruction.
Gelbaya TA et al., 2014·Obstetrical & gynecological survey
The diagnosis of unexplained infertility can be made only after excluding common causes of infertility using standard fertility investigations,which include semen analysis, assessment of ovulation, and tubal patency test. These tests have been selected as they have definitive correlation with pregnancy. It is estimated that a standard fertility evaluation will fail to identify an abnormality in approximately 15% to 30% of infertile couples. The reported incidence of such unexplained infertility varies according to the age and selection criteria in the study population. We conducted a review of the literature via MEDLINE. Articles were limited to English-language, human studies published between 1950 and 2013. Since first coined more than 50 years ago, the term unexplained infertility has been a subject of debate. Although additional investigations are reported to explain or define other causes of infertility, these have high false-positive results and therefore cannot be recommended for routine clinical practice. Couples with unexplained infertility might be reassured that even after 12 months of unsuccessful attempts, 50% will conceive in the following 12 months and another 12% in the year after.
Das S et al., 2012·Asian Pac J Cancer Prev·Free to read
Breast cancer is one of the most common cancers of women in India with high fatality rate. Over a 1 year study period 105 consecutive biopsy or fine needle aspiration cytology confirmed breast cancer patients were interviewed by direct questionnaire method regarding risk factors attending Surgery and Radiotherapy OPD of Medical College Kolkata, West Bengal while taking other 105 patients attending Surgery Department for some other disease as controls. The data were compiled in MS Excel 2007 and analyzed by Epi info 3.5.1 software. Among the cases, rural residence, illiteracy and low socio-economic status was significantly higher than controls. Late onset of menarche, late onset of menopause, ever OCP usage, breast feeding for 1-2 years and age of 1st childbirth between 20-30 years were found to be significant protective factors. People should be made aware regarding the modifiable risk factors to prevent breast cancer.
Delaying conception has increased the demand on assisted reproduction. Currently, more than 1% of children are conceived through assisted reproductive technologies (ART) worldwide and this number is likely to continue increasing. Like any other medical intervention ART is associated with both short-term and long-term complications. The major short-term complications include ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS) and multiple pregnancies. OHSS is difficult to predict, but meticulous preventive strategies and protocols are being developed that may limit it. Most of the morbidities in children born after ART are related to multiple pregnancies. New laboratory methodologies may allow the transfer of fewer embryos to maintain satisfactory live birth rates while reducing the risk of multiple pregnancies. In vitro fertilization may be associated with a slight increased risk for birth defects. Analysis of possible risks from these techniques is confounded by factors of underlying parental subfertility, fertility treatments and multiple births. The long-term sequelae remain largely undetermined. All outcomes of ART, including pregnancy rates and adverse complications, need to be compared with standard non-ART when deciding the appropriate course of treatment. The importance of counselling should never be ignored in any treatment decision.
What is the chance of clinical pregnancy when fallopian tube catheterization is used for proximal tubal obstruction? The pooled clinical pregnancy rate of tubal catheterization after proximal tubal obstruction is 27% (95% CI 25-30%). Restoring fallopian tube patency by performing tubal catheterization has fallen out of favour since the increased availability of IVF. Our study is the first systematic review and meta-analysis to investigate reproductive outcomes following tubal catheterization for proximal tubal obstruction. STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, We undertook a systematic review and meta-analysis of 27 observational studies consisting of 1720 patients undergoing tubal catheterization for proximal tubal obstruction, who attempted to conceive naturally after the procedure. PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, Systematic literature searches were performed in MEDLINE, EMBASE and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials. A total of 2195 titles and abstracts were reviewed. Only studies that reported outcomes when tubal catheterization was performed with no other tubal surgery were included. Twenty-seven cohort studies matched the inclusion criteria for the meta-analysis. MAIN The meta-analysis showed a pooled clinical pregnancy rate of 27% (95% CI 25-30%) after the use of tubal catheterization for unilateral or bilateral proximal tubal obstruction (27 studies, 1556 patients). In women with bilateral obstruction (14 studies, 617 patients), the clinical pregnancy rate was 27% (95% CI 23-32%). Our meta-analysis demonstrated that the pooled cumulative clinical pregnancy rates were 22.3% (95% CI 17.8-27.8%) at 6 months, 25.8% (95% CI 21.1-31.5%) at 9 months, 26.4% (95% CI 23.0-30.2%) at 12 months, 26.0% (95% CI 22.8-29.7%) at 18 months, 27.0% (95% CI 24.0-30.5%) at 24 months, 27.9% (95% CI 24.9-31.3%) at 36 months and 28.5% (95% CI 25.5-31.8%) at 48 months. The pooled live birth rate (14 studies, 551 patients) was 22% (95% CI 18-26%). The pooled ectopic pregnancy rate (27 studies, 1556 patients) was 4% (95% CI 3-5%). The included studies scored satisfactorily on the Newcastle-Ottawa quality assessment scale. LIMITATIONS, The pooled clinical pregnancy rate after tubal catheterization was found to be almost comparable to that after IVF. However, included studies were small, non-comparative series with significant clinical heterogeneity in population characteristics, follow-up and surgical equipment, technique and experience. These findings suggest fallopian tube catheterization as an alternative strategy to IVF in patients presenting with proximal tubal obstruction. Further research should focus on comparing different surgical techniques of fallopian tube catheterization with IVF and provide cumulative reproductive outcomes over long-term follow-up. STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTEREST(S): No funding was required and the authors have no competing interests to declare. N/A.
Shen H et al., 2020·J Int Med Res·Free full text on PubMed Central
To examine potential risk factors associated with the success rate following fallopian tube recanalization (FTR) in infertile women with obstruction of the proximal fallopian tube. We retrospectively studied patients who underwent FTR for tubal obstructive infertility between January 2016 and December 2018 at the Third Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University. FTR was performed using a catheter and guidewire system to clear tubal obstruction. Predictive factors potentially associated with the success rate were assessed by logistic regression. A total of 762 patients were included. Multivariable analysis showed that age (odds ratio [OR] = 2.38, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.24-4.58), infertility type (OR = 2.82, 95% CI: 1.36-6.21), history of ectopic pregnancy (OR = 7.87, 95% CI: 4.05-15.81), history of abdominal surgery (OR = 4.30, 95% CI: 2.22-8.60), history of artificial abortion curettage (OR = 4.08, 95% CI: 2.12-8.03), and duration of infertility (OR = 2.03, 95% CI: 1.06-3.85) were independently associated with postoperative tubal patency. Our findings suggest that risk factors, such as age ≥35 years, secondary infertility, duration of infertility ≥5 years, and histories of ectopic pregnancy, abdominal surgery, and artificial abortion curettage, affect the success rate of FTR. These factors may also predict surgical success in treating tubal obstructive infertility.
To review the physiology, pathology, and treatment of proximal tubal disease. Relevant reports on the pathophysiology of proximal tubal disease were reviewed. All studies in English of microsurgery and macrosurgery, and of radiographic and hysteroscopic cannulation in women with proximal tubal blockage were identified through MEDLINE searches. All studies of therapy for proximal blockage that included pregnancy rates were considered. Series of sterilization reversals, series of unilateral or combined procedures, and series in which the location of tubal blockage was not given were excluded from the data analyses. Raw data were assessed for homogeneity, then standardized and pooled. Total and ongoing pregnancy rates after microsurgery and macrosurgery, as well as radiographic and hysteroscopic transcervical cannulation, were compared by the chi2 test. Relative risks for total and ongoing pregnancies were calculated for all treatment methods. RESULT(S): This meta-analysis suggests that, overall, microsurgical anastomosis results in higher total and ongoing pregnancy rates than macrosurgery or radiographic tubal cannulation. However, pregnancy rates in selected series of transcervical tubal cannulation are similar to those reported for microsurgery. CONCLUSION(S): Ongoing intrauterine pregnancy rates near 50% can be achieved in patients with proximal blockage of the fallopian tube. Selective salpingography and transcervical cannulation under fluoroscopic guidance are effective at establishing patency in appropriately selected patients and are less invasive and costly than the surgical alternatives.
Guidelines by Clinical Area · Fertility and Infertility Guidelines
Practice Committee of the American Society for Reproductive Medicine, 2015·Fertil Steril
This document reviews surgical options for achieving patency in obstructed fallopian tubes and the factors that must be considered when deciding between surgical repair and IVF. This document replaces the document of the same name, last published in 2012 (Fertil Steril 2012;97:539–45).
Infertility › Tubal Factor › Proximal Tubal Obstruction · Reproductive Surgery › Tubal Surgery › Tubal Cannulation
Soumen Das
S Das
PMID 17908398 17908398 DOI 10.1016/s1472-6483(10)60362-8 10.1016/s1472-6483(10)60362-8 Das et al. 2007, Das 2007
Cite this article
Das, S., Nardo, L. G., & Seif, M. W. (2007). Proximal tubal disease: the place for tubal cannulation. Reproductive BioMedicine Online. https://doi.org/10.1016/s1472-6483(10)60362-8
Das S, Nardo LG, Seif MW. Proximal tubal disease: the place for tubal cannulation. Reproductive BioMedicine Online. 2007. doi:10.1016/s1472-6483(10)60362-8
Das, S., et al. "Proximal tubal disease: the place for tubal cannulation." Reproductive BioMedicine Online, 2007.
00ysvbp68