Research Methods · Measurement and Statistics

Reliability of ovulation tests in infertile women

Guermandi E, Vegetti W, Bianchi MM, Uglietti A, Ragni G, Crosignani P

Published January 12, 2001 Obstetrics and Gynecology, 97(1), 92-96
DOI 10.1016/s0029-7844(00)01083-8 PMID 11152915
Read our synopsis

RRM Academy Synopsis

Home urine LH tests preceded ovulation in every ovulatory cycle

Home urine LH tests turned positive before the follicle ruptured in every ovulatory cycle. In a 2001 Italian study, 101 infertile women with regular cycles tried four ovulation methods for one cycle each. Ultrasound was the check. Temperature charts and ultrasound agreed in about 3 out of 4 cases.

Key Findings

  • Ultrasound showed follicle growth and evidence of ovulation in 97 of 101 cycles (96%).
  • The LH surge preceded follicle rupture in all cycles, but the gap varied widely, up to about 72 hours. Three cycles had a positive LH test and no rupture.
  • Basal body temperature (BBT) and ultrasound agreed in 74% of cases. BBT could not be assessed in 11 cycles, and the timing of the BBT nadir varied widely.
  • Midluteal serum progesterone showed ovulatory values in 93 women, and ovulation agreed with ultrasound in 90 women.

Interpretation

This single-center study followed 101 infertile women, aged 24 to 38, for one cycle each. All had regular cycles and normal body weight. Ultrasound was the reference for ovulation. The study excluded women with signs of polycystic ovary syndrome and did not include women with irregular cycles. Four cycles lacked ultrasound evidence of ovulation, a small number for judging how well each test rules ovulation out. The authors report that one midluteal progesterone measurement seemed as effective as repeated ones.

RRM Context

The authors note that ultrasound was critical to telling ovulation from luteinized unruptured follicle syndrome in three cycles with a positive LH test. Temperature and LH tests are indirect signs that predict or suggest ovulation. The authors name pregnancy or a recovered egg as definitive proof of ovulation. Fertility awareness methods and other cycle charting use related indirect signs. This study compared them with ultrasound in infertile women.

Abstract

Objective

To assess the reliability of the most widely used clinical methods for predicting or confirming ovulation.

Methods

We monitored spontaneous cycles in 101 infertile women using basal body temperature (BBT), transvaginal ultrasound, a urinary stick system for LH surge, and three serum progesterone measurements in the midluteal phase. Transvaginal ultrasound monitoring was standard for ovulation detection and sensitivity. We calculated specificity and accuracy of each method compared with that standard.

Results

Follicular development and ultrasound evidence of ovulation were confirmed in 97 of 101 cycles (96%). Urinary LH surge preceded follicular rupture assessed by ultrasonography in all cycles and showed concordance with ultrasound-evidenced ovulation in 98 of 101 cases. The timing of BBT nadir had wide variability, and BBT and ultrasonography agreed in a similar percentage of cases (74%). Midluteal serum progesterone assessments showed ovulatory values in 93 subjects, and ovulation was concordant with ultrasonography in 90 subjects.

Conclusion

Urinary LH was accurate in predicting ovulation with ultrasonography as the standard for detection, but time varied widely. The nadir of BBT predicted ovulation poorly. The BBT chart was less accurate for confirming ovulation, whereas a single serum progesterone assessment in midluteal phase seemed as effective as repeated serum progesterone measures.

Topics

By this author

Related research

Research Methods › Measurement and Statistics › Instrument Development and Validation · Diagnostics › Cycle Biomarkers › Ovulation Detection · Menstrual Cycle › Cycle Biomarkers › Hormonal Markers
PMID 11152915 11152915 DOI 10.1016/s0029-7844(00)01083-8 10.1016/s0029-7844(00)01083-8 Guermandi et al. 2001, Guermandi 2001

Cite this article

Guermandi, E., Vegetti, W., Bianchi, M. M., Uglietti, A., Ragni, G., & Crosignani, P. (2001). Reliability of ovulation tests in infertile women. Obstetrics and gynecology, 97(1), 92-96. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0029-7844(00)01083-8