Robotic-assisted laparoscopic tubal anastomosis: Single institution analysis

Ghomi A, Nolan W, Rodgers B

Published September 21, 2020 The International Journal of Medical Robotics and Computer Assisted Surgery
DOI 10.1002/rcs.2155 PMID 32856401

Abstract

Tubal anastomosis has similar pregnancy rates regardless of approach. Historically, robotic anastomosis has been associated with increased cost and operative time. We sought to perform a contemporary study of these metrics. One hundred and nine patients were identified who underwent robotic-assisted laparoscopic tubal anastomosis. Retrospective analysis of medical records was performed. Phone survey was conducted. The mean operative time decreased from 140.7 ± 27.0 min in 2013 to 60.0 ± 9.1 min in 2018, with significant downward trend (p < 0.001). The mean cost was $7153.46 ± $1484.41. The pregnancy rate was 59% (35/59), and tubal patency rate was 81% (42/52). Seventy-two percent of patients under 37 years became pregnant. There is significant improvement in operative time of robotic-assisted tubal anastomosis with surgical experience. Robotic tubal anastomosis outperformed historical metrics of laparoscopy and laparotomy with regard to operative time and cost in this series.

By this author

Related research

Ali Ghomi, William Nolan, Bruce Rodgers
A Ghomi, Bill Nolan, Will Nolan, Billy Nolan, W Nolan, B Rodgers
PMID 32856401 32856401 DOI 10.1002/rcs.2155 10.1002/rcs.2155 Ghomi et al. 2020, Ghomi 2020