Selective salpingography and transvaginal catheter dilatation were performed in 157 women with infertility to diagnose, localize, and classify obstructive diseases of the fallopian tubes and to correct obstruction of the proximal (uterine-end) tube. In 61 (39%) of the patients, the selective salpingograms showed patent tubes despite the fact that two previous hysterosalpingograms showed obstruction of the proximal (uterine-end) tube. Transvaginal catheter dilatation successfully recanalized the proximal portion of the tubes in 79 (82%) of 96 patients with obstructed tubes. In 18 of 25 with successful transvaginal catheter dilatation and 6-month follow-up salpingography, the tubes remained patent. Coexisting disease of the distal (ovarian-end) tubes was diagnosed in 29 (18%) of the patients. Pregnancy was achieved in 11 of the 157 patients (six in whom obstructions were corrected by transvaginal catheter dilatation and five in whom selective salpingograms showed patent tubes). There were no complications due to the procedure. The excellent diagnostic and therapeutic yield, lack of complications, and low cost justify the use of these percutaneous techniques to investigate female infertility and to treat obstruction of the uterine end of the fallopian tube.
PMID 2107667 2107667 DOI 10.2214/ajr.154.4.2107667 10.2214/ajr.154.4.2107667 Lang et al. 1990, Lang 1990
Cite this article
Lang, E. K., Dunaway, H. E., & Roniger, W. E. (1990). Selective osteal salpingography and transvaginal catheter dilatation in the diagnosis and treatment of fallopian tube obstruction. AJR. American journal of roentgenology, 154(4), 735-740. https://doi.org/10.2214/ajr.154.4.2107667
Lang EK, Dunaway HE, Roniger WE. Selective osteal salpingography and transvaginal catheter dilatation in the diagnosis and treatment of fallopian tube obstruction. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1990;154(4):735-740. doi:10.2214/ajr.154.4.2107667
Lang, E. K., et al. "Selective osteal salpingography and transvaginal catheter dilatation in the diagnosis and treatment of fallopian tube obstruction." AJR. American journal of roentgenology, vol. 154, no. 4, 1990, pp. 735-740.
To investigate the role of transcervical tubal catheterization in diagnosis and treatment of proximal tubal obstruction associated with salpingitis isthmica nodosa. Retrospective case study. University hospital and outpatient radiology practice. Fifty-two women with proximal tubal obstruction associated with salpingitis isthmica nodosa. Selective salpingography and catheter recanalization using fluoroscopic guidance. The number of tubes visualized to the fimbria as a percentage of the tubes with proximal tubal obstruction on the initial hysterosalpingogram was determined as a measure of diagnostic efficacy. To evaluate the treatment potential of catheter recanalization, the patients were grouped according to tubal status at the conclusion of the procedure and subsequent pregnancies were evaluated. Forty-seven of 65 tubes (72%) with proximal tubal obstruction were recanalized successfully. Among the 19 women who were able to conceive only via a recanalized salpingitis isthmica nodosa tube, there were 6 live births (32%) and two tubal pregnancies (10%). Selective salpingography allows complete tubal diagnosis in almost three fourths of patients with proximal tubal obstruction and salpingitis isthmica nodosa. The radiographic diagnosis of salpingitis isthmica nodosa may be pressure dependent. Intrauterine pregnancies occur via recanalized salpingitis isthmica nodosa tubes, therefore catheter recanalization may be attempted before tubal microsurgery or IVF in patients with proximal tubal obstruction and associated salpingitis isthmica nodosa.
To characterize ampullary endosalpingeal findings in women with occlusive or nonocclusive salpingitis isthmica nodosa. Prospective case study. Obstetrics and Gynecology Department of a University Hospital. Twenty women (38 tubes) with occlusive or nonocclusive salpingitis isthmica nodosa were studied. Salpingoscopy was performed during diagnostic laparoscopy in 20 women (38 tubes) with hysterosalpingographic evidence of salpingitis isthmica nodosa. Salpingoscopic findings were recorded and the patients were managed accordingly. Of the 38 tubes 10 appeared radiographically and laparoscopically normal. Two tubes were occluded distally. Of the 26 tubes with occlusive or nonocclusive salpingitis isthmica nodosa, 5 (19.2%) showed varying degrees of endosalpingeal abnormality. Patients with abnormal salpingoscopy were regarded as having bipolar tubal disease and were referred for assisted conception. The remaining patients were scheduled for microsurgical tubal reconstruction. One in five patients with proximal tubal disease may have ampullary endosalpingeal damage of varying degrees. However, the significance of this finding in relation to subsequent management strategies and fertility outcome is yet to be characterized.
To evaluate further the safety and efficacy of selective ostial salpingography combined with transcervical wire recanalization for the diagnosis and treatment of proximal tubal obstruction. Prospective study. Division of Reproductive Endocrinology and Department of Radiology at Harbor-University of California Los Angeles (UCLA) Medical Center, a tertiary care academic institution. Twenty-eight infertile patients diagnosed with proximal tubal obstruction by hysterosalpingogram (HSG) or by chromopertubation at laparoscopy (total of 46 obstructed tubes). After antibiotic prophylaxis and IV analgesia a conventional HSG was performed. If proximal tubal obstruction was confirmed, selective salpingography was done under fluoroscopic guidance. If proximal tubal obstruction was still present, wire recanalization using a new prototype cannula was then performed. If recanalization was successful, contrast media was injected to confirm tubal patency. Proximal tubal patency, complete tubal patency, pregnancies. Eleven of 46 tubes (23.9%) were patent by HSG. Ostial salpingography of the remaining 35 tubes revealed 6 patent tubes (13%). Nine of the 29 obstructed tubes (31%) had successful wire recanalization, and 8 of these were patent distally. There were 4 intrauterine pregnancies (IUPs) and 1 ectopic pregnancy after recanalization and 2 IUPs after ostial salpingography. Selective salpingography should be considered at the time of an HSG showing proximal tubal obstruction. If indicated, wire recanalization can also be attempted. Selective ostial salpingography combined with wire recanalization is a safe and effective procedure for the diagnosis and treatment of PTO.
Obstruction of the uterine (proximal) end of the fallopian tube is noted on up to 20% of hysterosalpingograms and has a variety of underlying causes. Definitive diagnosis and treatment in the past have required laparoscopy or laparotomy with tubal resection. Selective salpingography and fallopian tube recanalization with fluoroscopically guided catheters has emerged as an improved method both for diagnosis and treatment in these patients. Technical success rates for overcoming the obstruction and visualizing distal tubal anatomy range from 76% to 95%. Pregnancy rates after the procedure vary depending on the patient populations studied; however, early results indicate a greater than 50% intrauterine pregnancy rate by 1 year. The rate of ectopic pregnancy is approximately 10% and that of early tubal reocclusion is less than 30%. Selective salpingography and fallopian tube recanalization is recommended as the first intervention in patients with obstruction of the proximal fallopian tube.