Journal of the American Medical Association, 141(16), 1123, 1949
Abstract
A discussion of infertility would be incomplete without a comment on the changing concepts of the definition. For statistical purposes it may be necessary to retain the criterion of a three year barren marriage. However, for the most satisfactory therapeutic results it appears that investigations for infertility must be instituted before these three, possibly most valuable, years have been wasted. The validity of shortening the period is substantiated by work of Diddle1 and Guttmacher,2 who independently obtained a figure of six months as the average time for a normal couple to achieve pregnancy. Relative infertility may be considered to exist any time after a six month interval. As late marriages and prolonged use of contraceptives are an integral part of our present society (especially in the private practice group) the foregoing fact is extremely important. Patients who marry after the age of 28 are contending, after a three
Topics
historical infertility management 1940s, definition of infertility barren marriage duration, relative infertility six month interval conception, Jones GE infertility management, shortening infertility evaluation period early investigation, delayed marriage age and fertility outcomes, prolonged contraceptive use and subsequent infertility, Guttmacher average time to conception normal couple, therapeutic results early infertility treatment, infertility diagnosis criteria history
PMID 15394678 15394678 DOI 10.1001/jama.1949.02910160013004 10.1001/jama.1949.02910160013004 Jones et al. 1949, Jones 1949
Cite this article
Jones, G. E. S. (1949). Some newer aspects of the management of infertility. Journal of the American Medical Association, 141(16), 1123. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.1949.02910160013004
Jones GES. Some newer aspects of the management of infertility. J Am Med Assoc. 1949;141(16):1123. doi:10.1001/jama.1949.02910160013004
Jones, G. E. S. "Some newer aspects of the management of infertility." Journal of the American Medical Association, vol. 141, no. 16, 1949, pp. 1123.
Keywords
Disease Management, Humans, Infertility, STERILITY
Related articles
clinical-guidelines/diagnostic-criteria-and-classification/terminology-and-definitions research-methods/framing-and-discourse-analysis/institutional-default-analysisethics-and-policy/policy-and-regulation/professional-standards
Definition of Infertility and Indications for Fertility Evaluation: Consensus Document
Minjeur M et al., 2026 · Journal of Restorative Reproductive Medicine
Infertility is a clinical condition that is recognized by the symptom of an inability to conceive through sexual intercourse or to sustain a pregnancy, with that symptom indicating underlying male and/or female pathology. This definition of infertility was developed through a structured, consensus-informed process involving broad stakeholder engagement. Initially, multiple definitions currently used by various medical professional organizations were reviewed, and a definition document was drafted and submitted to the Board of Directors of the International Institute for Restorative Reproductive Medicine (IIRRM). All IIRRM members were invited to provide feedback on the draft. Approximately 2,500 individuals and 44 organizations from 92 countries were then invited to review the proposed document, representing clinical, scientific, patient, policy, and advocacy perspectives. Submitted comments were reviewed thematically, with suggested revisions evaluated for clarity, clinical relevance, inclusiveness, and consistency with contemporary restorative reproductive medicine. Following this review, 3 substantive changes, 18 minor changes, and 15 citation corrections were incorporated into the final draft which resulted in a revised definition intended to better reflect the medical, social, and practical realities of modern infertility evaluation and care. Final approval by the IIRRM Board of Directors was unanimous.
infertility/evaluation/diagnostic-workup clinical-guidelines/guideline-appraisal/adoption-and-practice-variationassisted-reproduction/procedures/ivf-protocols
Real World Fertility Evaluation & Care Prior to In Vitro Fertilization: Care Gaps That Could be Addressed by Restorative Reproductive Medicine: A Retrospective 5-Million Patient Claims Based Care-Gap Analysis
Parnell T et al., 2026 · Journal of Restorative Reproductive Medicine
To evaluate adherence to published American Society for Reproductive Medicine (ASRM) and American Urological Association (AUA) infertility evaluation and treatment recommendations among commercially insured infertility patients who subsequently underwent in vitro fertilization (IVF), and to assess whether observed care gaps support the need for a restorative reproductive medical framework. A retrospective claims-based analysis was performed using MarketScan® Commercial Claims and Encounter Data between January 1, 2021, and December 31, 2024. Approximately five million commercially insured members were evaluated. Patients with infertility-related diagnoses who subsequently underwent IVF were identified. Claims were analyzed for evidence of selected diagnostic testing, medical treatment, or surgical interventions recommended by ASRM or AUA/ASRM guidance for specific infertility-related diagnoses before IVF initiation. Cumulative adherence rates were assessed up to nine months following initial infertility diagnosis and compared with the timing of initiating IVF. IVF initiation started early and consistently preceded completion of most recommended evaluations and treatments. By 3 months, the proportion of patients with IVF initiation ranged from 28% to 39% across different infertility-related diagnoses, while adherence to most recommended interventions remained low. Overall, by 9 months, IVF utilization had reached 70–85%, while many recommended evaluations and treatments remained below 40% adherence, with several interventions remaining below 15%. Observed care gaps (percentage of patients receiving IVF prior to other evaluation or treatment recommendations) ranged from approximately 13% to 78% for most recommended evaluations and treatments, with several measures demonstrating gaps over 50% of patients. These findings suggest substantial divergence between published infertility-care recommendations and observed practice patterns. From the perspective of restorative reproductive medicine (RRM), the gaps are clinically important because many recommended steps are directed toward identifying, correcting, restoring, or preserving reproductive function and anatomy before offering or initiating IVF treatment. Limitations to these data include lack of individualized patient medical data, preferences, or circumstances, and not capturing any treatment that was not reimbursed by commercial insurance (i.e., any cash payment for services). In addition, the recommendations assessed have variable levels of underlying evidence, and likely vary in the level of their acceptance among practicing clinicians. Many commercially insured infertility patients progressed to IVF without documented evidence of diagnostic evaluation or therapeutic interventions recommended in ASRM and AUA/ASRM guidance. These findings raise important questions regarding the implementation of adequate evaluation before IVF and the extent to which patients receive meaningful opportunities for diagnosis-directed treatment of potentially reversible causes of infertility. The findings further suggest an important role for RRM as a quality-of-care framework focused on comprehensive evaluation, correction of underlying dysfunction, preservation of reproductive anatomy and physiology, and optimization of patient-centered fertility care, prior to considering IVF.
clinical-guidelines/diagnostic-criteria-and-classification/terminology-and-definitions ethics-and-policy/advocacy-and-public-understanding/public-awarenessresearch-methods/framing-and-discourse-analysis/framing-devices
Open Access
Polyendocrine metabolic ovarian syndrome, the new name for polycystic ovary syndrome: a multistep global consensus process
Teede HJ et al., 2026 · Lancet (London, England)
Polyendocrine metabolic ovarian syndrome (PMOS), previously named polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS), affects one in eight women. However, the term PCOS is inaccurate, implying pathological ovarian cysts, obscuring diverse endocrine and metabolic features, and contributing to delayed diagnosis, fragmented care, and stigma, while curtailing research and policy framing. Building on an international mandate for change, we outline an unprecedented, rigorous, multistep global consensus process for the name change. Funding and governance were established with engagement of 56 leading academic, clinical, and patient organisations. Using iterative global surveys (with responses from 14 360 people with PCOS and multidisciplinary health professionals from all world regions), modified Delphi methods, nominal group technique workshops, and marketing and implementation analyses, we identified principles prioritising scientific accuracy, clarity, stigma avoidance, cultural appropriateness, and implementation feasibility. An accurate new name was prioritised over retaining the PCOS acronym or a generic name. Implementation approaches prioritised evolution rather than transformation. Preferred terms were polyendocrine, metabolic, and ovarian, reflecting the condition's multisystem pathophysiology, and polyendocrine metabolic ovarian syndrome was the consensus new name. Accuracy was improved by omitting cysts and by capturing endocrine, metabolic, and ovarian dysfunction. A co-designed global implementation strategy, including a transition period, education, and alignment with health systems and disease classification, is under way.
infertility/evaluation/diagnostic-workup restorative-reproductive-medicine/naprotechnology/program-outcomes
Open Access
Natural procreative technology (NaProTechnology) for infertility: take-home baby rate and clinical outcomes in a 5-year single-center cohort of 1,310 couples
Sánchez-Méndez JI et al., 2025 · Front Reprod Health
Assisted reproductive technologies (ART) are widely used to address infertility; however, they are costly, associated with medical risks, and often yield suboptimal clinical outcomes. Natural Procreative Technology, also known as NaProTechnology (NPT), provides a systematic and integrative approach to infertility by thoroughly identifying and treating underlying medical conditions to restore the couple's natural fertility potential. Despite its promise, real-world data on NPT effectiveness remain limited. The objective of this study is to evaluate the take-home baby rate in a large population of infertile couples treated with NPT and to synthesize findings from previously published studies. A retrospective cohort study was conducted involving 1,310 infertile couples treated at a specialized fertility clinic in Spain over a 5-year period. Participants presented with primary or secondary infertility or recurrent pregnancy loss. Clinical data, diagnoses, and outcomes were analyzed, including surgical interventions and treatment duration. The mean age of women and men was 35.0 (SD 4.4) and 36.9 (SD 5.3) years, respectively. Primary infertility was the most common subtype (73.5%), the median infertility duration was 24 months, and prior ART attempts were recorded in 27.5% of couples. Mean number of diagnoses per couple was 2.5 (SD 1.3). The crude take-home baby rate was 35.3% (N = 463). Independent predictors of successful take-home baby included female age, recurrent pregnancy loss as the reason for consultation, duration of infertility, and the presence of endometriosis, hormonal dysfunction, male factor, and endometrial disorders as diagnoses. Considering a median duration of NPT of 10.9 months (range 8.1-17.0), the adjusted cumulative take-home baby rate was 62.1%. Rates varied significantly by female age, with higher success observed in younger women: 83.7% at 18-30 years, 53.3% at 36-40 years, and 24.4% over 40 years. A sensitivity analysis was performed to assess the impact of dropout assumptions on cumulative pregnancy rates. Nearly one-third of patients underwent surgery, most commonly hysteroscopy and/or laparoscopy. In this cohort, NPT was associated with a notably high take-home baby rate in an infertile population with unfavorable prognostic factors, including advanced maternal age, prolonged duration of infertility, or previous failed attempts at conventional ART procedures.