Male Fertility · Male Reproductive Surgery
RRM Academy Synopsis
Surgery retrieves sperm in 44% of cycles in Klinefelter syndrome
Surgery found sperm in 44% of attempts in men with Klinefelter syndrome, a 2017 meta-analysis of 37 observational studies found. Age, testis size and hormone levels did not change the retrieval rate. About 4 out of 10 ICSI cycles using that sperm ended in a live birth.
Key Findings
- Across 37 studies and 1248 men with Klinefelter syndrome, sperm retrieval succeeded in 44% of testicular sperm extraction (TESE) cycles (95% CI 39 to 48%).
- Conventional TESE retrieved sperm in 43% of cycles (35 to 50%) and microsurgical TESE in 45% (38 to 52%). Per patient, the retrieval rate was 45% (40 to 51%).
- Studies enrolling men under 20 years and studies of the rest of the sample each found a 43% retrieval rate (P = 0.95).
- In 29 studies, the pooled pregnancy rate after ICSI was 43% per cycle (36 to 50%). The live birth rate was 43% per cycle (34 to 53%).
- Fresh and cryopreserved sperm gave similar live birth rates per ICSI cycle: 39% (23 to 57%) and 29% (17 to 44%), P = 0.38.
Interpretation
The paper pools group averages from 37 observational studies. Twenty were prospective and 17 retrospective, so the pooled rates rest on observational data. The authors had no patient-level data and could not exclude some selection bias from the retrospective studies or the effect of unadjusted confounders. They call for confirmation in larger trials. All but two studies enrolled non-mosaic Klinefelter syndrome. Too few studies reported testosterone treatment, the woman's age or chromosome findings in the children to test them. Higher FSH showed a possible link to lower live birth rates (P = 0.06).
RRM Context
The authors note that most cases of Klinefelter syndrome go undiagnosed. Men often learn of it during a couple's infertility evaluation. A chromosome cause of azoospermia (no sperm in the semen) gets a name only when the man is evaluated. Restorative reproductive medicine evaluates both partners from the start. The pregnancy figures come from ICSI, which bypasses the sperm-production problem and leaves it unresolved.
Abstract
Specific factors underlying successful surgical sperm retrieval rates (SRR) or pregnancy rates (PR) after testicular sperm extraction (TESE) in adult patients with Klinefelter syndrome (KS) have not been completely clarified.
The aim of this review was to meta-analyse the currently available data from subjects with KS regarding SRRs as the primary outcome. In addition, when available, PRs and live birth rates (LBRs) after the ICSI technique were also investigated as secondary outcomes.
An extensive Medline, Embase and Cochrane search was performed. All trials reporting SRR for conventional-TESE (cTESE) or micro-TESE (mTESE) and its specific determinants without any arbitrary restriction were included.
Out of 139 studies, 37 trials were included in the study, enrolling a total of 1248 patients with a mean age of 30.9 ± 5.6 years. The majority of the studies (n = 18) applied mTESE, 13 applied cTESE and in one case testicular sperm aspiration (TESA) was used. Additionally, four studies used a mixed approach and in one study, the method applied for sperm retrieval was not specified. Overall, a SRR per TESE cycle of 44[39;48]% was detected. Similar results were observed when mTESE was compared to cTESE (SRR 43[35;50]% vs 45[38;52]% for cTESE vs micro-TESE, respectively; Q = 0.20, P = 0.65). Meta-regression analysis showed that none of the parameters tested, including age, testis volume and FSH, LH and testosterone (T) levels at enrollment, affected the final SRR. Similarly, no difference was observed when a bilateral procedure was compared to a unilateral approach. No sufficient data were available to evaluate the effect of previous T treatment on SRR. Information on fertility outcome after ICSI was available for 29 studies. Overall a total of 218 biochemical pregnancies after 410 ICSI cycles were observed (PR = 43[36;50]%). Similar results were observed when LBR was analyzed (LBR = 43[34;53]%). Similar to what was observed for SRR, no influence of KS age, mean testis volume, LH, FSH or total T levels on either PR and LBR was observed. No sufficient data were available to test the effect of the women's age or other female fertility problems on PR and LBR. Finally, no difference in PR or LBR was observed when the use of fresh sperm was compared to the utilization of cryopreserved sperm.
The present data suggest that performing TESE/micro-TESE in subjects with KS results in SRRs of close to 50%, and then PRs and LBRs of close to 50%, with the results being independent of any clinical or biochemical parameters tested.