Lack of standardization in analytic methods for assigning infertility data is attributed to inadequate classification of fertility problems, and a lack of consistent methodology in evaluating outcome of infertility therapy. A classification scheme ideally should consider types of fertility problems as well as clinical assessment of its severity. Until an adequate classification system is developed, researchers are encouraged to describe fully the nature of infertility problem examined, and present results for homogenous groups of patients. The life-table method of analysis is a useful technique for assessing infertility statistics. The starting point of this method should depend on the group examined and may be either the date of 1st visit to the clinic or the date that therapy is instituted. Approximate date of conception should be the endpoint. A mathematical model of infertility predicated on the assumption that there is a constant monthly probability of conception of fecundability can be used to derive equations with potential for clinical application.
PMID 456633 456633 DOI 10.1016/s0015-0282(16)44120-8 10.1016/s0015-0282(16)44120-8 Cramer et al. 1979, Cramer 1979
Cite this article
Cramer, D. W., Walker, A. M., & Schiff, I. (1979). Statistical methods in evaluating the outcome of infertility therapy. Fertility and Sterility, 32(1), 80-86. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0015-0282(16)44120-8
Cramer DW, Walker AM, Schiff I. Statistical methods in evaluating the outcome of infertility therapy. Fertil Steril. 1979;32(1):80-86. doi:10.1016/s0015-0282(16)44120-8
Cramer, D. W., et al. "Statistical methods in evaluating the outcome of infertility therapy." Fertility and sterility, vol. 32, no. 1, 1979, pp. 80-86.
Keywords
Actuarial Analysis, Evaluation Studies As Topic, Female, Humans, Infertility/therapy, Male, Models, Biological, Pregnancy, Statistics As Topic, Data Analysis, Demographic Analysis, Infertility, Life Table Method, Mathematical Model, Reproduction, Research Methodology, Surveys
Related articles
Measurement and Statistics · Instrument Development and Validation
To standardize the recording of surgical phenotypic information on endometriosis and related sample collections obtained at laparoscopy, allowing large-scale collaborative research into the condition.
An international collaboration involving 34 clinical/academic centers and three industry collaborators from 16 countries.
Two workshops were conducted in 2013, bringing together 54 clinical, academic, and industry leaders in endometriosis research and management worldwide. PATIENT(S): None. INTERVENTION(S): A postsurgical scoring sheet containing general and gynecological patient and procedural information, extent of disease, the location and type of endometriotic lesion, and any other findings was developed during several rounds of review. Comments and any systematic surgical data collection tools used in the reviewers' centers were incorporated. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): The development of a standard recommended (SSF) and minimum required (MSF) form to collect data on the surgical phenotype of endometriosis. RESULT(S): SSF and MSF include detailed descriptions of lesions, modes of procedures and sample collection, comorbidities, and potential residual disease at the end of surgery, along with previously published instruments such as the revised American Society for Reproductive Medicine and Endometriosis Fertility Index classification tools for comparison and validation. CONCLUSION(S): This is the first multicenter, international collaboration between academic centers and industry addressing standardization of phenotypic data collection for a specific disease. The Endometriosis Phenome and Biobanking Harmonisation Project SSF and MSF are essential tools to increase our understanding of the pathogenesis of endometriosis by allowing large-scale collaborative research into the condition.
Measurement and Statistics · Instrument Development and Validation
To develop a clinical tool that predicts pregnancy rates (PRs) in patients with surgically documented endometriosis who attempt non-IVF conception.
Prospective data collection on 579 patients and comprehensive statistical analysis to derive a new staging system--the endometriosis fertility index (EFI)--from data rather than a priori assumptions, followed by testing the EFI prospectively on 222 additional patients for correlation of predicted and actual outcomes.
Private reproductive endocrinology practice.
PATIENT(S): A total of 801 consecutively diagnosed and treated infertile patients with endometriosis.
INTERVENTION(S): Surgical diagnosis and treatment followed by non-IVF fertility management.
MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): The EFI and life table PRs.
RESULT(S): A statistically significant variable used to create the EFI was the least function score (i.e., the sum of those scores determined intraoperatively after surgical intervention that describe the function of the tube, fimbria, and ovary on both sides). Sensitivity analysis showed that the EFI varies little, even with variation in the assignment of functional scores, and predicted PRs.
CONCLUSION(S): The EFI is a simple, robust, and validated clinical tool that predicts PRs after endometriosis surgical staging. Its use provides reassurance to those patients with good prognoses and avoids wasted time and treatment for those with poor prognoses.
To develop a new method for estimating the effectiveness of emergency contraception (EC) by using information about previous menstrual cycle length, accounting for the variation in the day of ovulation within the menstrual cycle, and comparing the validity of the new and previous methods. METHOD(S): Secondary analysis of a data set with a biological marker of ovulation and its distribution in the cycle. Based on a sample of cycles with known length and a known biological marker of ovulation, we simulated trials of predetermined EC effectiveness and then calculated estimates of EC effectiveness based on old and new methods. RESULT(S): Under some conditions, all methods produced biased estimates of effectiveness with simulated trials, especially when the actual effectiveness was low. The systematic bias was minimized with the new method. The new method was robust with regard to the distribution of the day of intercourse in women presenting for EC. CONCLUSION(S): Future studies of EC effectiveness should consider both the uncertainty in predicting the day of ovulation and previous cycle length. Our estimates of daily fecundity should be replicated with other data sets.
Diagnostic Criteria and Classification · Staging and Classification Systems