Account

Contraception · Family Planning Use and Attitudes

The behavior of Italian family physicians regarding the health problems of women and, in particular, family planning (both contraception and NFP)

Girotto S, Del Zotti F, Baruchello M, Gottardi G, Valente M, Battaggia A, Rosa B, Fedrizzi P, Campanella M, Zumerle M, Bressan F

Published June 1997 Advances in Contraception : the Official Journal of the Society for the Advancement of Contraception, 13(2-3), 283-293
DOI 10.1023/a:1006576626670 PMID 9288347

Abstract

The hospital-centered trend that has dominated medical culture and the management of health care during this entire century has, in the last few years, undergone a reversal in Italy. Conditions in other countries suggest that similar changes have or will become increasingly common. The family physician today manages many of the functions previously handled by hospitals and specialists. In the field of reproductive health, family physicians are responsible not only for diagnosis and treatment, but also for prevention and education. The present study considers this new context with the objective of investigating the knowledge and behavior of Italian family physicians in the field of women's health, with particular regard to family planning (including natural family planning), through (1) a qualitative study (focus groups) of a small group of family physicians and (2) a questionnaire sent to 500 family physicians throughout Italy. The results of the focus group are summarized in the form of obstacles that the family physician finds in providing family planning services and proposals for change. The results indicate that because of their holistic approach, the family physician is an appropriate provider of family planning services although continued use of specialists' services, changes in logistics of the family physicians' practice, increased gender sensitivity, and additional training and information are necessary. The results of the questionnaire (121 responses, 24.2%) indicate that the Italian family physician currently lacks certain important information about family planning and would require logistical support to provide these services but is interested in acquiring information and is an appropriate family planning provider. An additional challenge for encouraging family practitioners to provide natural methods is that they favor a "medical" approach rather than a "behavioral" one in their treatment preferences for several other conditions.

Topics

By this author

Ultrasound · Follicular Monitoring

Sensitivity and specificity of ultrasound indices of ovulation in spontaneous cycles

Ecochard R et al., 2000 European journal of obstetrics, gynecology, and reproductive biology

Evaluation of sensitivity and specificity of 4 ultrasound indices of ovulation. Multicenter collaborative study of 794 abdominal and transvaginal ultrasound scanning of ovaries performed during 271 cycles in 107 normally fertile women. Comparison of sensitivities and specificities of indices using McNemar test. The sensitivity and specificity of the indices were 84 and 89.2, respectively, for disappearance or sudden decrease in follicle size; 38.4 and 79.7 for appearance of ultrasonic echoes in the follicle; 61.6 and 87.1 for irregularity of follicular walls; 71.0 and 88.2 for appearance of free fluid in the cul-de-sac of Douglas. Ultrasonic echoes had a significantly lower sensitivity (P<0.001) and specificity (P<0.01) than other indices.

Related research

Family Planning Use and Attitudes · Attitudes and Acceptability

Natural family planning: physicians' knowledge, attitudes, and practice

Choi J et al., 2010 J Obstet Gynaecol Can

To assess physicians' knowledge, attitudes, and practice with respect to four evidence-based natural family planning (NFP) Standard Days, cervical mucus, basal body temperature, and the lactational amenorrhea method. We undertook a cross-sectional survey of a random sample of family physicians and all gynaecologists in British Columbia (n = 460) who have women of reproductive age in their practice, as well as all affiliated residents (n = 239). Main outcome measures were (1) physicians' attitudes towards NFP and their perceptions of its effectiveness; (2) the relationship between physicians' demographic factors, their personal experience or beliefs, and their attitudes and knowledge; and (3) how these factors affect the counselling physicians offer their patients. The survey response rate was 44%. Only 3% to 6% of physicians had correct knowledge of the effectiveness in perfect use of the NFP methods cited in this study. Fifty percent of physicians who responded mention NFP to their patients as an option for contraception, and 77% of physicians mention NFP as an option to couples trying to conceive. Family physicians and residents were much more likely than gynaecologists or gynaecology residents to mention NFP during counselling. Older physicians were more likely to mention NFP than younger physicians and also had more personal experience with NFP. Most physicians in our study underestimated the effectiveness of NFP methods, and only a small proportion of physicians provide information about NFP during contraceptive counselling. Physicians need better understanding of modern methods of NFP to provide evidence-based contraceptive counselling to selected highly motivated patients who prefer NFP as a contraceptive choice.

Family Planning Use and Attitudes · Attitudes and Acceptability

Interest in natural family planning among female family practice patients

Lemaire JC et al., 1994 Fam Pract Res J

Although modern methods of natural family planning (NFP) are effective both to avoid and to achieve pregnancy, relatively few women use these methods. It is not known whether this is due primarily to lack of interest or to other factors. We therefore explored the level of interest in NFP among female family practice patients. We mailed information about NFP to 400 female patients between ages 21 and 42 and conducted follow-up interviews by telephone. We excluded 162 women for whom we could not obtain accurate addresses or phone numbers, 68 women we could not reach by telephone, 67 women who were not currently at risk of pregnancy, and 15 women for other reasons. Twenty-eight women refused to participate in the study. Sixty women completed telephone interviews. Forty-three percent of respondents (n = 60) were interested in learning more about NFP, 24% said they were likely to use NFP to avoid pregnancy, and 32% were likely to use NFP to achieve pregnancy. Younger women and women who were Christian but not Catholic and not of a major Protestant denomination were more interested in NFP. Some female family practice patients are interested in learning and using NFP.

Family Planning Use and Attitudes · Attitudes and Acceptability

Physicians' knowledge and practices regarding natural family planning

Stanford JB et al., 1999 Obstet Gynecol

To assess physicians' knowledge and practices of modern methods of natural family planning. A questionnaire was mailed to 840 physicians selected randomly from Missouri state licensing records for obstetrics-gynecology, family practice, general practice, and general internal medicine. The response rate was 65%. A total of 375 physicians (69% of respondents) saw women for reproductive issues. About half (46%) of physicians reported that they mentioned natural family planning to at least some women when discussing family planning issues. Observing vaginal discharge of cervical mucus was discussed by 40% of physicians in the context of avoiding pregnancy and by 36% of physicians in the context of helping a couple achieve pregnancy. Twenty-two percent of physicians estimated the best possible effectiveness of natural family planning to avoid pregnancy to be greater than 90%, and 35% estimated the actual effectiveness to avoid pregnancy to be greater than 70%. (The threshold rates of 90% best possible effectiveness and 70% actual effectiveness were chosen to be somewhat less than those reported in medical literature.) Physicians who gave higher estimates of effectiveness of natural family planning and physicians who were aware of an instructor in their community were more likely to provide women with relevant information about natural family planning. Most physicians, especially those unaware of availability of instructors in their areas, underestimate the effectiveness of natural family planning and do not give information about modern methods to women.

Family Planning Use and Attitudes · Attitudes and Acceptability

Physician and Nurses’ Knowledge and Use of Natural Family Planning

Fehring RJ, 1995 Linacre Q

Perinatal health professionals are in key positions to either promote or dissuade the use of Natural Family Planning (NFP). The purpose of this article is to describe a survey conducted with perinatal physicians and nurses on their knowledge and professional use of NFP. Four hundred and fifty physicians and nurses (150 MDs and 300 RNs) were sent a questionnaire on the use of and knowledge of NFP. One hundred sixty-six (or 37%) returned the completed questionnaires. Fifty-two percent of the nurses who returned the questionnaires and 48% of the physicians indicated they were taught about NFP in basic (generic) medical or nursing school. The average lecture time spent on the subject in either nursing or medical school was less than one hour. The majority learned about NFP through self-education or on-the-job training. Only four (1 RN and 3 MDs) are certified to teach NFP. Fifty-three percent of the nurses and 44% of physicians would not advise the use of NFP to avoid pregnancy. The most frequent reasons given for not promoting the use of NFP to either avoid or achieve pregnancy were that it is not effective, not natural, too difficult to learn, better methods are available, and it only works for highly motivated educated women.

Contraception › Family Planning Use and Attitudes › Attitudes and Acceptability
F Del Zotti
PMID 9288347 9288347 DOI 10.1023/a:1006576626670 10.1023/a:1006576626670 Girotto et al. 1997, Girotto 1997

Cite this article

Girotto, S., Del Zotti, F., Baruchello, M., Gottardi, G., Valente, M., Battaggia, A., Rosa, B. S. D., Fedrizzi, P., Campanella, M., Zumerle, M., & Bressan, F. (1997). The behavior of Italian family physicians regarding the health problems of women and, in particular, family planning (both contraception and NFP). Advances in contraception : the official journal of the Society for the Advancement of Contraception, 13(2-3), 283-293. https://doi.org/10.1023/a:1006576626670

Learn

Resources

Tools

Help

Candid Platinum Transparency 2026

RRM Academy is a 501(c)(3) nonprofit providing free and low-cost education in restorative reproductive medicine for patients and healthcare professionals.

This site is an educational resource and does not provide medical advice. Inclusion of a study does not imply endorsement of its findings. Always consult a qualified healthcare provider for diagnosis and treatment.

© 2026 RRM Academy · All Rights Reserved

Restorative Reproductive Medicine Foundation · 3401 Hartzdale Dr, Ste 103B PMB 3518, Camp Hill, PA 17011 · EIN: 93-4594315
Sitemap AI Instructions Developers Terms of Use Medical Disclaimer Privacy Policy