The effect of interobserver variation in dating endometrial histology on the diagnosis of luteal phase defects

Ovarian reserve parameters and IVF outcomes in 510 women with poor ovarian response (POR) treated with intraovarian injection of autologous platelet rich plasma (PRP)

Cakiroglu Y et al., 2022 · Aging (Albany NY) · Free full text on PubMed Central

The aim of the current study was to characterize ovarian reserve parameters and IVF outcomes in women with a history of poor ovarian response (POR) treated with intraovarian injection of autologous platelet rich plasma (PRP). Reproductive age women (N=510; age range 30-45yo) diagnosed with POR based on Poseidon criteria were included in the study. PRP treatment resulted in higher AFC, higher serum AMH, lower serum FSH, and a higher number of mature oocytes and cleavage and blastocyst stage embryos. After PRP injection, 22 women (4.3%) conceived spontaneously, 14 (2.7%) were lost to follow up, and 474 (92.9%) attempted IVF. Among women who attempted IVF, 312 (65.8%) generated embryos and underwent embryo transfer, 83 (17.5%) achieved a pregnancy, and 54 (11.4%) achieved sustained implantation/live birth (SI/LB). In total, of the 510 women with POR and mean age of 40.3, PRP resulted in improvement of ovarian reserve parameters, a pregnancy rate of 20.5% and SI/LB rate of 12.9%. Our findings suggest that PRP treatment may be considered in women with POR. For wider clinical application, its clinical efficacy will need to be demonstrated in prospective randomized clinical trials.

Evaluation of the impact of intraobserver variability on endometrial dating and the diagnosis of luteal phase defects

Scott RT et al., 1993 · Fertil Steril

To determine the magnitude of intraobserver variation in dating endometrial biopsies and its impact on clinical management. Blinded histopathologic interpretation of endometrial biopsy specimens 1 year apart by five pathologists. Large military tertiary care center. Endometrial biopsy specimens from 51 patients undergoing evaluation for potential luteal phase defects. None. Calculation of the magnitude of the individual and overall intraobserver variation in endometrial dating for the five pathologists and estimation of its potential impact on clinical management. The intraobserver variation was 0.69 +/- 0.05 days (means +/- SE). There was no significant difference in the magnitude of the variation for 1-day or 2-day dating ranges. The theoretical probability of altering clinical management by having the same pathologist redate a given specimen ranged from 15% to 28%. Histologic dating of endometrial biopsies is subject to a small but highly clinically significant intraobserver variability that may have a major impact on clinical management.

Predictive value: symptoms of preterm labor

Strickland DM, 1991 · Am J Obstet Gynecol · Free to read

How precise is histologic dating of endometrium using the standard dating criteria?

Li TC et al., 1989 · Fertil Steril

Sixty-three endometrial biopsies were dated histologically by using the standard criteria on two separate occasions by the same observer. Overall, it was found that exact agreement occurred in 15 (24%), but disagreement of more than 2 days occurred in 6 (10%). The proportion of exact agreement in the first half of the luteal phase (32%) was found to be significantly higher (P less than 0.05) than that in the second half of the luteal phase (9%). In a separate part of the study, 27 women had two endometrial biopsies, each performed in a separate cycle. The within-subject between-cycle variation of the results of endometrial dating (exact agreement: 4%, disagreement of more than 2 days: 41%) was found to be significantly different from intraobserver variation (P less than 0.01 for both). The amount of intraobserver variation suggests that the traditional dating criteria are not precise enough to quantify corpus luteum function in the second half of the luteal phase, whereas the amount of within-subject between-cycle variation implies that the result of endometrial dating in one cycle cannot be used reliably to predict that of another cycle.

Endometrial biopsy in the evaluation of infertility

Wentz AC, 1980 · Fertil Steril

One hundred and forty-nine patients presenting with infertility underwent two hundred and ten endometrial biopsies as part of a routine infertility evaluation. The initial biopsy was out of phase in 44 (29.5%), confirmed by subsequent biopsy to yield a total of 28 (19%) patients with luteal phase inadequacy. Of 44 patients taking clomiphene citrate, 13 (29.5%) had out-of-phase biopsies. Although hyperprolactinemia, recurrent miscarriages, extremes of reproductive life, and clomiphene citrate administration have been associated with an increased incidence of the defect, in this series a predisposing cause could not be detected in approximately one-half of the patients. The routinely obtained endometrial biopsy provides a safe, reproducible, and adequate means of providing histologic evidence for normal endometrial development for subsequent implantation.

Error in histologic dating of secretory endometrium: variance component analysis

Gibson M et al., 1991 · Fertil Steril

To characterize the extent and sources of imprecision in histologic dating of the endometrial biopsy. Duplicate endometrial biopsies from 25 women were dated by five evaluators on two separate occasions to evaluate the overall precision of the measure. Using variance component analysis, estimates of intrauterine, intraevaluator, and interevaluator variability were determined. Samples were obtained during outpatient fertility testing. Evaluators were colleagues at the same institution. PATIENTS, Women presenting with infertility undergoing routine evaluation. None. Variability in histologic dating of the endometrium. Inconsistencies between evaluators accounted for 65% of the observed variability, whereas 27% was because of inconsistencies in duplicate readings by the same evaluator. Regional differences in the uterus accounted for only 8% of the total variability. The overall error from these sources have the potential to result in a substantial false-positive rate for diagnosis of luteal phase defect.

Clinical investigation of the menstrual cycle. III. Clinical, endometrial, and endocrine aspects of luteal defect

Gautray JP et al., 1981 · Fertil Steril

This study was intended to correlate different clinical and biologic parameters to better define luteal insufficiency (LI) and to contribute to a better understanding of its origin. Endometrial patterns were used as the basis for classification of clinical cases. Of 328 outpatients with menstrual disorders and/or infertility, 88 were considered to have LI. Their cycles were compared with 79 normal cycles. Two different principal endometrial patterns of LI are described: pure LI, when the endometrium is more than 2 days out of phase; and LI with persistent estrogenic influence, when the histologic estrogenic stigmata are excessive during the luteal phase. Basal body temperature charts demonstrated menstrual cycle disturbances: either ovulation delay or a slow increase in temperature (longer than 2 days). Plasma steroid concentrations also demonstrated a perturbation of the entire menstrual cycle: progesterone levels were statistically significantly lower in LI than in normal cycles and this defect was worse when the estrogenic influence was persistent; the preovulatory estradiol peak was disturbed in all circumstances, as was the concentration of endometrial steroid receptors. These simultaneous abnormalities strongly suggest a central origin of LI.